Realizing a high measure of confidence for defect level analysis of random testing [VLSI]

1995 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 446-450 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen-Ben Jone ◽  
Paresh Gondalia ◽  
A. Gutjahr
VLSI Design ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 457-474
Author(s):  
W. B. Jone ◽  
D. C. Huang ◽  
S. C. Chang ◽  
S. R. Das

Pseudorandom testing has been widely used in built-in self-testing of VLSI circuits. Although the defect level estimation for pseudorandom testing has been performed using sequential statical analysis, no closed form can be accomplished as complex combinatorial enumerations are involved. In this work, a Markov model is employed to describe the pseudorandom test behaviors. For the first time, a closed form of the defect level equation is derived by solving the differential equation extracted from the Markov model. The defect level equation clearly describes the relationships among defect level, fabrication yield, the number of all input combinations, circuit detectability (in terms of the worst single stuck-at fault), and pseudorandom test length. The Markov model is then extended to consider all single stuck-at faults, instead of only the worst single stuck-at fault. Results demonstrate that the defect level analysis for pseudorandom testing by only dealing with the worst single stuck-at fault is not adequate (In fact, the worst single stuck-at fault analysis is just a special case). A closed form of the defect level equation is successfully derived to incorporate all single stuck-at faults into consideration. Although our discussions are primarily based on the single struck-at fault model, it is not difficult to extend the results to other fault types.


Carbon ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seung-Mo Kim ◽  
Ho-In Lee ◽  
Yongsu Lee ◽  
So-Young Kim ◽  
Tae Jin Yoo ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 72-81
Author(s):  
Christina M. Rudin-Brown ◽  
Eve Mitsopoulos-Rubens ◽  
Michael G. Lenné

Random testing for alcohol and other drugs (AODs) in individuals who perform safety-sensitive activities as part of their aviation role was introduced in Australia in April 2009. One year later, an online survey (N = 2,226) was conducted to investigate attitudes, behaviors, and knowledge regarding random testing and to gauge perceptions regarding its effectiveness. Private, recreational, and student pilots were less likely than industry personnel to report being aware of the requirement (86.5% versus 97.1%), to have undergone testing (76.5% versus 96.1%), and to know of others who had undergone testing (39.9% versus 84.3%), and they had more positive attitudes toward random testing than industry personnel. However, logistic regression analyses indicated that random testing is more effective at deterring AOD use among industry personnel.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document