Research on Zinc Layer Thickness Prediction Based on LSTM Neural Network

Author(s):  
Zhao Lu ◽  
Yimin Liu ◽  
Shi Zhong
2016 ◽  
Vol 94 (4) ◽  
pp. 204-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Maher ◽  
A. A. D. Sarhan ◽  
H. Marashi ◽  
M. M. Barzani ◽  
M. Hamdi

Processes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 925
Author(s):  
Daniel-Constantin Anghel ◽  
Daniela Monica Iordache ◽  
Alin Daniel Rizea ◽  
Nicolae-Doru Stanescu

Nowadays, FDM technology permits obtaining functional prototypes or even end parts. The process parameters, such as layer thickness, building orientation, fill density, type of support, etc., have great influence on the quality, functionality and behavior of the obtained parts during their lifetime. In this paper, we present a study concerning the possibilities of obtaining certain values for clearance in revolute joints of non-assembly mechanisms manufactured by FDM 3D Printing. To ensure the functioning of the assembly, one must know the relationship between the imposed and measured clearances by taking into account the significant input data. One way is to use the automat learning method with an artificial neuronal network (ANN). The data necessary for the training, testing, and validation of ANN were experimentally obtained, using a complete L 27 Taguchi experimental plan. A total of 27 samples were printed with different values of the following parameters: the infill density, the imposed clearance between the shaft and the hole, and the layer thickness. ANN architecture corresponds to the Hecht–Kolmogorov theorem. Genetic algorithms (GA) were used for the optimization of the output. The Neural Network Toolbox from MATLAB was used for training the network and a hybrid tool genetic algorithm artificial neural network (GA-ANN) was used to minimize the value of the absolute relative clearance (arc). The minimum value of the absolute relative clearance established by GA-ANN was 0.0385788. This value was validated experimentally, with a relative difference of 4%. We also introduced a rational function to approximate the correlation between the input and output parameters. This function fulfills some frontier conditions resulted from practice. In addition, the function may be used to establish the designed clearance in order to obtain an imposed one.


Author(s):  
Karin Kandananond

Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) or Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) or three-dimension (3D) printing are rapid prototyping processes for workpieces. There are many factors which have a significant effect on surface quality, including bed temperature, printing speed, and layer thickness. This empirical study was conducted to determine the relationship between the above-mentioned factors and average surface roughness (Ra). Workpieces of cylindrical shape were fabricated by an FFF system with a Polylactic acid (PLA) filament. The surface roughness was measured at five different positions on the bottom and top surface. A response surface (Box-Behnken) method was utilised to design the experiment and statistically predict the response. The total number of treatments was sixteen, while five measurements (Ra1, Ra2, Ra3, Ra4 and Ra5) were carried out for each treatment. The settings of each factor were as follows: bed temperature (80, 85, and 90 °C), printing speed (40, 80 and 120 mm/s), and layer thickness (0.10, 0.25 and 0.40 mm). The prediction equation of surface roughness was then derived from the analysis. The same set of data was also used as the inputs for a machine learning method, an artificial neural network (ANN), to construct the prediction equation of surface roughness. Rectified linear unit (ReLU) was utilised as the activation function of ANN. Two training algorithms (resilient backpropagation with weight backtracking and globally convergent resilient backpropagation) were applied to train multi-layer perceptrons. Moreover, the different number of neurons in each hidden layer was also studied and compared. Another interesting aspect of this study is that the ANN was based on a limited number of training samples. Finally, the prediction errors of each method were compared, to benchmark the prediction performance of the two methods: Box-Behnken and ANN.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document