Modelling of Ionization Current in a Flame based on Hammerstein Models

Author(s):  
Julian Tacke ◽  
Robert Dehnert ◽  
Sabine Lerch ◽  
Bernd Tibken
2016 ◽  
Vol 136 (5) ◽  
pp. 625-632
Author(s):  
Yoshihiro Matsui ◽  
Hideki Ayano ◽  
Shiro Masuda ◽  
Kazushi Nakano

1987 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 228-233
Author(s):  
Saburou KUWANO ◽  
Masahiro SUGIYAMA ◽  
Yoshio SHIBUYA ◽  
Terunori OOTAKE ◽  
Takeo OKI

1997 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lars Eriksson ◽  
Lars Nielsen ◽  
Mikael Glavenius

A continuous record of the ionization current produced by cosmic rays in an ionization chamber shows, if the recording apparatus is sufficiently sensitive, occasional relatively large momentary currents superposed on the normal fluctuations. These large momentary currents are generally called “bursts”. They were first discovered by Hoffmann. It has often been assumed that the bursts are of the same nature as the showers which are observed either in the Wilson chamber or by means of three or more coincidence counters; but so far no conclusive evidence, particularly for the larger bursts, has been reported in support of this assumption.


2021 ◽  
pp. 146808742110399
Author(s):  
Veniero Giglio ◽  
Livia Della Ragione ◽  
Alessandro di Gaeta ◽  
Natale Rispoli

Ionization current measured at the spark plug during combustion in spark ignition engines has often been proposed to determine the crank-angle at combustion pressure peak, namely the peak pressure angle, for the purpose of regulating spark timing to attain maximum brake torque (MBT). The proposal is based on the assumption that agreement exists between peak pressure angle and the angular position of the ionization current second peak, although no one has ever proved it by an appropriate statistical analysis. The aim of this work, for the first time and by rigorous statistical methods, is to prove the agreement between Peak Pressure Angle and Ionization Current Second Peak Angle (ICSPA), without which a MBT control via ICSPA would be ineffective. Our experimental database consisted of about 9000 pairs of Peak Pressure Angle and Ionization Current Second Peak Angle values corresponding to 90 different operating conditions of a spark ignition engine. A two-sample comparison was first carried out between mean values of Peak Pressure Angle and Ionization Current Second Peak Angle, which showed a statistically significant difference between them. Then Bland-Altman analysis (Lancet, 1986), widely known and used for checking agreement between two different measurement methods, was conducted. It demonstrated that under almost all the experimental operating conditions, there was no agreement between the Ionization Current Second Peak Angle and the Peak Pressure Angle.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document