scholarly journals Multiform Logical Time & Space for Specification of Automated Driving Assistance Systems: Work-in-Progress

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qian Liu ◽  
Robert de Simone ◽  
Xiaohong Chen ◽  
Jing Liu
Keyword(s):  
Automated Driving ◽  
Work In Progress ◽  
Logical Time ◽  
Time Space ◽  
Driving Assistance ◽  
Assistance Systems

Trust in Technology as a Safety Aspect in Highly Automated Driving

i-com ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Philipp Wintersberger ◽  
Andreas Riener
Keyword(s):  
Safety Issue ◽  
Interaction Model ◽  
Emotional States ◽  
Critical Systems ◽  
Automated Driving ◽  
Moral Decisions ◽  
Driving Assistance ◽  
Assistance Systems ◽  
Trust In Technology ◽  
Highly Automated Driving

AbstractTrust in technology is an important factor to be considered for safety-critical systems. Of particular interest today is the transport domain, as more and more complex information and assistance systems find their way into vehicles. Research in driving automation / automated driving systems is in the focus of many research institutes worldwide. On the operational side, active safety systems employed to save lives are frequently used by non-professional drivers that neither know system boundaries nor the underlying functional principle. This is a serious safety issue, as systems are activated under false circumstances and with wrong expectations. At least some of the recent incidents with advanced driving assistance systems (ADAS) or automated driving systems (ADS; SAE J3016) could have been prevented with a full understanding of the driver about system functionality and limitations (instead of overreliance). Drivers have to be trained to accept and use these systems in a way, that subjective trust matches objective trustworthiness (cf. “appropriate trust”) to prevent disuse and / or misuse. In this article, we present an interaction model for trust calibration that issues personalized messages in real time. On the showcase of automated driving we report the results of two user studies related to trust in ADS and driving ethics. In the first experiment (N = 48), mental and emotional states of front-seat passengers were compared to get deeper insight into the dispositional trust of potential users of automated vehicles. Using quantitative and qualitative methods, we found that subjects accept and trust ADSs almost similarly as male / female drivers. In another study (N = 40), moral decisions of drivers were investigated in a systematic way. Our results indicate that the willingness of drivers to risk even severe accidents increases with the number and age of pedestrians that would otherwise be sacrificed. Based on our initial findings, we further discuss related aspects of trust in driving automation. Effective shared vehicle control and expected advantages of fully / highly automated driving (SAE levels 3 or higher) can only be achieved when trust issues are demonstrated and resolved.

scholarly journals Drivers’ Intentions to Use Different Functionalities of Conditionally Automated Cars: A Survey Study of 18,631 Drivers from 17 Countries

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (22) ◽  
pp. 12054
Author(s):  
Tyron Louw ◽  
Ruth Madigan ◽  
Yee Mun Lee ◽  
Sina Nordhoff ◽  
Esko Lehtonen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Online Survey ◽  
Previous Experience ◽  
Survey Study ◽  
Intention To Use ◽  
Automated Driving ◽  
Death Rates ◽  
Traffic Jams ◽  
Operational Design ◽  
Driving Assistance ◽  
Assistance Systems

A number of studies have investigated the acceptance of conditionally automated cars (CACs). However, in the future, CACs will comprise of several separate Automated Driving Functions (ADFs), which will allow the vehicle to operate in different Operational Design Domains (ODDs). Driving in different environments places differing demands on drivers. Yet, little research has focused on drivers’ intention to use different functions, and how this may vary by their age, gender, country of residence, and previous experience with Advanced Driving Assistance Systems (ADAS). Data from an online survey of 18,631 car drivers from 17 countries (8 European) was used in this study to investigate intention to use an ADF in one of four different ODDs: Motorways, Traffic Jams, Urban Roads, and Parking. Intention to use was high across all ADFs, but significantly higher for Parking than all others. Overall, intention to use was highest amongst respondents who were younger (<39), male, and had previous experience with ADAS. However, these trends varied widely across countries, and for the different ADFs. Respondents from countries with the lowest Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and highest road death rates had the highest intention to use all ADFs, while the opposite was found for countries with high GDP and low road death rates. These results suggest that development and deployment strategies for CACs may need to be tailored to different markets, to ensure uptake and safe use.

scholarly journals Do drivers change their manual car-following behaviour after automated car-following?

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tyron Louw ◽  
Rafael Goncalves ◽  
Guilhermina Torrao ◽  
Vishnu Radhakrishnan ◽  
Wei Lyu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Driving Simulator ◽  
Cruise Control ◽  
Automated Driving ◽  
Behavioural Adaptation ◽  
Car Following ◽  
Time Headway ◽  
Driving Behaviour ◽  
Driving Assistance ◽  
Change In Mean ◽  
Lead Vehicle

There is evidence that drivers’ behaviour adapts after using different advanced driving assistance systems. For instance, drivers’ headway during car-following reduces after using adaptive cruise control. However, little is known about whether, and how, drivers’ behaviour will change if they experience automated car-following, and how this is affected by engagement in non-driving related tasks (NDRT). The aim of this driving simulator study, conducted as part of the H2020 L3Pilot project, was to address this topic. We also investigated the effect of the presence of a lead vehicle during the resumption of control, on subsequent manual driving behaviour. Thirty-two participants were divided into two experimental groups. During automated car-following, one group was engaged in an NDRT (SAE Level 3), while the other group was free to look around the road environment (SAE Level 2). Both groups were exposed to Long (1.5 s) and Short (.5 s) Time Headway (THW) conditions during automated car-following, and resumed control both with and without a lead vehicle. All post-automation manual drives were compared to a Baseline Manual Drive, which was recorded at the start of the experiment. Drivers in both groups significantly reduced their time headway in all post-automation drives, compared to a Baseline Manual Drive. There was a greater reduction in THW after drivers resumed control in the presence of a lead vehicle, and also after they had experienced a shorter THW during automated car following. However, whether drivers were in L2 or L3 did not appear to influence the change in mean THW. Subjective feedback suggests that drivers appeared not to be aware of the changes to their driving behaviour, but preferred longer THWs in automation. Our results suggest that automated driving systems should adopt longer THWs in car-following situations, since drivers’ behavioural adaptation may lead to adoption of unsafe headways after resumption of control.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document