Prioritizing Clinical Information System Project Risk Factors: A Delphi Study

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guy Pare ◽  
Claude Sicotte ◽  
Mirou Jaana ◽  
David Girouard
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Information System ◽  
Delphi Study ◽  
Clinical Information System ◽  
Clinical Information ◽  
Project Risk ◽  
System Project

Prioritizing the Risk Factors Influencing the Success of Clinical Information System Projects

2008 ◽  
Vol 47 (03) ◽  
pp. 251-259 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Sicotte ◽  
M. Jaana ◽  
D. Girouard ◽  
G. Paré
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Information System ◽  
Information Systems ◽  
Information Technologies ◽  
Clinical Information System ◽  
Clinical Information ◽  
Clinical Work ◽  
Perceived Usefulness ◽  
Clinical Information Systems ◽  
Factors Influencing

Summary Objective: The aim of this study is to gain a better understanding of the risk factors influencing the success of clinical information system projects. Methods: This study addresses this issue by first reviewing the extant literature on information technology project risks, and second conducting a Delphi survey among 21 experts highly involved in clinical information system projects in Québec, Canada, a region where government have invested heavily in health information technologies in recent years. Results: Twenty-three risk factors were identified. The absence of a project champion was the factor that experts felt most deserves their attention. Lack of commitment from upper management was ranked second. Our panel of experts also confirmed the importance of a variable that has been extensively studied in information systems, namely, perceived usefulness that ranked third. Respondents ranked project ambiguity fourth. The fifth-ranked risk was associated with poor alignment between the clinical information systems’ characteristics and the organization of clinical work. The large majority of risk factors associated with the technology itself were considered less important. This finding supports the idea that technology-associated factors rarely figure among the main reasons for a project failure. Conclusions: In addition to providing a comprehensive list of risk factors and their relative importance, the study presents a major contribution by unifying the literature on information systems and medical infor - matics. Our checklist provides a basis for further research that may help practitioners identify the effective countermeasures for mitigating risks associated with the implementation of clinical information systems.

A Computer-based Clinical Information System

1987 ◽  
Vol 26 (04) ◽  
pp. 189-194
Author(s):  
S. S. El-Gamal
Keyword(s):  
Information System ◽  
Hospital Information System ◽  
Clinical Information System ◽  
Research Work ◽  
Clinical Information ◽  
Hospital Staff ◽  
Vital Role ◽  
Daily Routine ◽  
Specialized Hospital ◽  
Computer Based

SummaryModern information technology offers new opportunities for the storage and manipulation of hospital information. A computer-based hospital information system, dedicated to urology and nephrology, was designed and developed in our center. It involves in principle the employment of a program that allows the analysis of non-restricted, non-codified texts for the retrieval and processing of clinical data and its operation by non-computer-specialized hospital staff.This Hospital Information System now plays a vital role in the efficient provision of a good quality service and is used in daily routine and research work in this hospital. This paper describes this specialized Hospital Information System.

scholarly journals Implementing an Integrated Large-Scale Clinical Information System for ISSSTE’s Hospital Network in Mexico

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 444-453
Author(s):  
Arturo Cervantes Trejo ◽  
Sophie Domenge Treuille ◽  
Isaac Castañeda Alcántara
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Information System ◽  
Health Care Services ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Clinical Information System ◽  
Clinical Information ◽  
Public Hospitals ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Cost Reductions

AbstractThe Institute for Security and Social Services for State Workers (ISSSTE) is a large public provider of health care services that serve around 13.2 million Mexican government workers and their families. To attain process efficiencies, cost reductions, and improvement of the quality of diagnostic and imaging services, ISSSTE was set out in 2019 to create a digital filmless medical image and report management system. A large-scale clinical information system (CIS), including radiology information system (RIS), picture archiving and communication system (PACS), and clinical data warehouse (CDW) components, was implemented at ISSSTE’s network of forty secondary- and tertiary-level public hospitals, applying global HL-7 and Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) standards. In just 5 months, 40 hospitals had their endoscopy, radiology, and pathology services functionally interconnected within a national CIS and RIS/PACS on secure private local area networks (LANs) and a secure national wide area network (WAN). More than 2 million yearly studies and reports are now in digital form in a CDW, securely stored and always available. Benefits include increased productivity, reduced turnaround times, reduced need for duplicate exams, and reduced costs. Functional IT solutions allow ISSSTE hospitals to leave behind the use of radiographic film and printed medical reports with important cost reductions, as well as social and environmental impacts, leading to direct improvement in the quality of health care services rendered.

scholarly journals Development of safety and usability guideline for clinical information system

Medicine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 100 (13) ◽  
pp. e25276
Author(s):  
Yura Lee ◽  
Sangwoo Bahn ◽  
Gee Won Shin ◽  
Min-Young Jung ◽  
Taezoon Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Information System ◽  
Clinical Information System ◽  
Clinical Information

Tools in a clinical information system supporting clinical trials at a Swiss University Hospital

2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 673-680 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Weisskopf ◽  
Guido Bucklar ◽  
Jürg Blaser
Keyword(s):  
Information System ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Clinical Research ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
Clinical Information System ◽  
Clinical Information ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Trial Registry ◽  
Trial Participants ◽  
Year 2013

Background: Issues concerning inadequate source data of clinical trials rank second in the most common findings by regulatory authorities. The increasing use of electronic clinical information systems by healthcare providers offers an opportunity to facilitate and improve the conduct of clinical trials and the source documentation. We report on a number of tools implemented into the clinical information system of a university hospital to support clinical research. Methods: In 2011/2012, a set of tools was developed in the clinical information system of the University Hospital Zurich to support clinical research, including (1) a trial registry for documenting metadata on the clinical trials conducted at the hospital, (2) a patient–trial–assignment–tool to tag patients in the electronic medical charts as participants of specific trials, (3) medical record templates for the documentation of study visits and trial-related procedures, (4) online queries on trials and trial participants, (5) access to the electronic medical records for clinical monitors, (6) an alerting tool to notify of hospital admissions of trial participants, (7) queries to identify potentially eligible patients in the planning phase as trial feasibility checks and during the trial as recruitment support, and (8) order sets to facilitate the complete and accurate performance of study visit procedures. Results: The number of approximately 100 new registrations per year in the voluntary trial registry in the clinical information system now matches the numbers of the existing mandatory trial registry of the hospital. Likewise, the yearly numbers of patients tagged as trial participants as well as the use of the standardized trial record templates increased to 2408 documented trial enrolments and 190 reports generated/month in the year 2013. Accounts for 32 clinical monitors have been established in the first 2 years monitoring a total of 49 trials in 16 clinical departments. A total of 15 months after adding the optional feature of hospital admission alerts of trial participants, 107 running trials have activated this option, including 48 out of 97 studies (49.5%) registered in the year 2013, generating approximately 85 alerts per month. Conclusions: The popularity of the presented tools in the clinical information system illustrates their potential to facilitate the conduct of clinical trials. The tools also allow for enhanced transparency on trials conducted at the hospital. Future studies on monitoring and inspection findings will have to evaluate their impact on quality and safety.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document