Impact of Capacity Calculation Methods on Grid Operation Studies: Flow Based versus Net Transfer Capacity

Author(s):  
Marius Siemonsmeier ◽  
Kevin Pacco ◽  
Lukas Weber ◽  
Albert Moser
Author(s):  
Bernd-Robert Ho¨hn ◽  
Peter Oster ◽  
Gregor Steinberger

In experimental analyzes the pitting load capacity of case carburized spur and helical gears is determined in back-to-back test rigs. The research program with one type of spur and 8 types of helical gears includes tests for the determination of influences of varying load distribution, overlap ratio and transmission ratio. The test results are presented and evaluated on the basis of the pitting load capacity calculation methods of ISO 6336-2/DIN 3990, part 2. A new DIN/ISO compatible calculation method for pitting load capacity is presented. This new calculation method comprehends helical gears more adequate than ISO 6336-2 / DIN 3990, part 2 and has the possibility to consider tooth flank modifications. The new calculation method is applied on test results and gears of a calculation study. It shows better accordance with the experimental test results than the present ISO 6336-2 / DIN 3990, part 2.


Jurnal CIVILA ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Reno Dwi Santoso ◽  
Dwi Kartikasari

In general, foundation is defined as the underground building that continues the load from the weight of the building itself and fromthe external load that works at the buildi ng to the ground around it. Carrying capacity analysis of pile is needed to get the planning of foundation that meetsthe requirements. There are many calculation methods used to analyze the carrying capacity of the pile, but it needs to consider which method is more fulfilling from the data in the field, for that, it needs  carrying  capacity  analysis  of  several  methods  based  on  field  data  using  sondir  data  and compared to one another to obtain more realistic results. Capacity analysis method of pile on the construction of Dams Motion in Sembayat Gresik uses static and dynamic methods. In the dynamic method, it use several methods, those are Hiley equation, Wika Method, ENR method, Eytelwein Method, Navy-Mc.Kay Method, and Michigan State Highway of Commission  Method. While in the static  method,  it  uses  Luciano  Dacourt  Method.  From  the  analysis  of  the  static  pile  carrying capacity obtained the result that pile carrying capacity calculation of Luciano Dacourt Method is smaller,  pull Q permitted  15.25 tons and maximum press Q  permitted    41.55 tons compared with the calculation method by using kalendering result of Eytelwein Method. In Eytelwein Method, the minimum pile carrying capacity is 61.566 tons of calculations in GW 1.


2011 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 76-84
Author(s):  
Saulius Pilkavičius

This article investigates two chosen calculation methods of compressed reinforced concrete elements strengthened using reinforced concrete jackets. Shortly describe carrying capacity calculation algorithms of these calculation methods. Present elements basic equations and dependences of carrying capacity. For calculation methods of carrying capacity comparison and adjustment executed carrying capacity experimental studies of compressed fiber reinforcement concrete elements strengthened using reinforcement concrete jackets. Were compared theoretical calculations of carrying capacity results with experimental carrying capacity results. Shortly describe advantages and disadvantages of analyzed calculation methods and experimental research. By the comparison of calculation methods conclusions and experimental studies conclusions, produces improved calculation method of carrying capacity.


2014 ◽  
Vol 578-579 ◽  
pp. 1366-1369
Author(s):  
Xiao Pan Yang ◽  
Yong Yao ◽  
Yun Peng Chu ◽  
Tao Yang

In recent years, the carbon fiber reinforced plastics (CFRP) has been widely used in field of structural reinforcement. To investigate the effect of different amount of CFRP strengthening pre-stressed concrete hollow-core slabs and the capacity calculation methods, test data of six slabs reinforced with CFRP at different amount were compared to obtain a available calculation formula of flexural capacity. The results showed that the bearing capacity and ductility of these specimens are significantly improved strengthened with CFRP; the proposed method of calculation is safe, simple, practical and relatively high accuracy, the calculation results coincide well with experimental results, and it has a certain reference value for the calculation of the followed studies and practical projects.


2015 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 83-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bogumił Wrana

Abstract The article is a review of the current problems of the foundation pile capacity calculations. The article considers the main principles of pile capacity calculations presented in Eurocode 7 and other methods with adequate explanations. Two main methods are presented: α – method used to calculate the short-term load capacity of piles in cohesive soils and β – method used to calculate the long-term load capacity of piles in both cohesive and cohesionless soils. Moreover, methods based on cone CPTu result are presented as well as the pile capacity problem based on static tests.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document