Performance Comparisson Activity Recognition using Logistic Regression and Support Vector Machine

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Agus Eko Minarno ◽  
Wahyu Andhyka Kusuma ◽  
Hardianto Wibowo
Keyword(s):  
Support Vector Machine ◽  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Activity Recognition ◽  
Support Vector

scholarly journals Hybrid Integration Approach of Entropy with Logistic Regression and Support Vector Machine for Landslide Susceptibility Modeling

Entropy ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (11) ◽  
pp. 884 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tingyu Zhang ◽  
Ling Han ◽  
Wei Chen ◽  
Himan Shahabi
Keyword(s):  
Support Vector Machine ◽  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Landslide Susceptibility ◽  
Shaanxi Province ◽  
Slope Aspect ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Operating Characteristics ◽  
Study Region ◽  
Susceptibility Maps ◽  
Landslide Susceptibility Maps

The main purpose of the present study is to apply three classification models, namely, the index of entropy (IOE) model, the logistic regression (LR) model, and the support vector machine (SVM) model by radial basis function (RBF), to produce landslide susceptibility maps for the Fugu County of Shaanxi Province, China. Firstly, landslide locations were extracted from field investigation and aerial photographs, and a total of 194 landslide polygons were transformed into points to produce a landslide inventory map. Secondly, the landslide points were randomly split into two groups (70/30) for training and validation purposes, respectively. Then, 10 landslide explanatory variables, such as slope aspect, slope angle, altitude, lithology, mean annual precipitation, distance to roads, distance to rivers, distance to faults, land use, and normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), were selected and the potential multicollinearity problems between these factors were detected by the Pearson Correlation Coefficient (PCC), the variance inflation factor (VIF), and tolerance (TOL). Subsequently, the landslide susceptibility maps for the study region were obtained using the IOE model, the LR–IOE, and the SVM–IOE model. Finally, the performance of these three models was verified and compared using the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve. The success rate results showed that the LR–IOE model has the highest accuracy (90.11%), followed by the IOE model (87.43%) and the SVM–IOE model (86.53%). Similarly, the AUC values also showed that the prediction accuracy expresses a similar result, with the LR–IOE model having the highest accuracy (81.84%), followed by the IOE model (76.86%) and the SVM–IOE model (76.61%). Thus, the landslide susceptibility map (LSM) for the study region can provide an effective reference for the Fugu County government to properly address land planning and mitigate landslide risk.

scholarly journals HARTH: A Human Activity Recognition Dataset for Machine Learning

Sensors ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (23) ◽  
pp. 7853
Author(s):  
Aleksej Logacjov ◽  
Kerstin Bach ◽  
Atle Kongsvold ◽  
Hilde Bremseth Bårdstu ◽  
Paul Jarle Mork
Keyword(s):  
Neural Network ◽  
Machine Learning ◽  
Support Vector Machine ◽  
Convolutional Neural Network ◽  
Activity Recognition ◽  
Human Activity ◽  
Short Term Memory ◽  
Human Activity Recognition ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Free Living

Existing accelerometer-based human activity recognition (HAR) benchmark datasets that were recorded during free living suffer from non-fixed sensor placement, the usage of only one sensor, and unreliable annotations. We make two contributions in this work. First, we present the publicly available Human Activity Recognition Trondheim dataset (HARTH). Twenty-two participants were recorded for 90 to 120 min during their regular working hours using two three-axial accelerometers, attached to the thigh and lower back, and a chest-mounted camera. Experts annotated the data independently using the camera’s video signal and achieved high inter-rater agreement (Fleiss’ Kappa =0.96). They labeled twelve activities. The second contribution of this paper is the training of seven different baseline machine learning models for HAR on our dataset. We used a support vector machine, k-nearest neighbor, random forest, extreme gradient boost, convolutional neural network, bidirectional long short-term memory, and convolutional neural network with multi-resolution blocks. The support vector machine achieved the best results with an F1-score of 0.81 (standard deviation: ±0.18), recall of 0.85±0.13, and precision of 0.79±0.22 in a leave-one-subject-out cross-validation. Our highly professional recordings and annotations provide a promising benchmark dataset for researchers to develop innovative machine learning approaches for precise HAR in free living.

scholarly journals Identification of Bio-Markers for Breast Cancer Detection through Data Mining Methods

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2S3) ◽  
pp. 763-769
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Support Vector Machine ◽  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Feature Selection ◽  
Discriminant Analysis ◽  
Classification Tree ◽  
Partial Least Square ◽  
Diagnostic Methods ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Breast Cancer Dataset

Worldwide, breast cancer is the leading type of cancer in women accounting for 25% of all cases. Survival rates in the developed countries are comparatively higher with that of developing countries. This had led to the importance of computer aided diagnostic methods for early detection of breast cancer disease. This eventually reduces the death rate. This paper intents the scope of the biomarker that can be used to predict the breast cancer from the anthropometric data. This experimental study aims at computing and comparing various classification models (Binary Logistic Regression, Ball Vector Machine (BVM), C4.5, Partial Least Square (PLS) for Classification, Classification Tree, Cost sensitive Classification Tree, Cost sensitive Decision Tree, Support Vector Machine for Classification, Core Vector Machine, ID3, K-Nearest Neighbor, Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), Log-Reg TRIRLS, Multi Layer Perceptron (MLP), Multinomial Logistic Regression (MLR), Naïve Bayes (NB), PLS for Discriminant Analysis, PLS for LDA, Random Tree (RT), Support Vector Machine SVM) for the UCI Coimbra breast cancer dataset. The feature selection algorithms (Backward Logit, Fisher Filtering, Forward Logit, ReleifF, Step disc) are worked out to find out the minimum attributes that can achieve a better accuracy. To ascertain the accuracy results, the Jack-knife cross validation method for the algorithms is conducted and validated. The Core vector machine classification algorithm outperforms the other nineteen algorithms with an accuracy of 82.76%, sensitivity of 76.92% and specificity of 87.50% for the selected three attributes, Age, Glucose and Resistin using ReleifF feature selection algorithm.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document