Methane potential of food waste from Engineering Faculty Cafeteria in Universitas Indonesia

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Budiasti Wulansari ◽  
Gabriel Andari Kristanto
Keyword(s):  
Food Waste ◽  
Engineering Faculty ◽  
Methane Potential

scholarly journals Batch Anaerobic Co-Digestion and Biochemical Methane Potential Analysis of Goat Manure and Food Waste

Energies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (7) ◽  
pp. 1952
Author(s):  
Ayobami Orangun ◽  
Harjinder Kaur ◽  
Raghava R. Kommalapati
Keyword(s):  
Food Waste ◽  
Gompertz Model ◽  
Water Displacement ◽  
Biochemical Methane Potential ◽  
Greenhouse Gasses ◽  
Nonlinear Regression Models ◽  
The Us ◽  
Methane Potential ◽  
Goat Manure ◽  
Modified Gompertz Model

The improper management of goat manure from concentrated goat feeding operations and food waste leads to the emission of greenhouse gasses and water pollution in the US. The wastes were collected from the International Goat Research Center and a dining facility at Prairie View A&M University. The biochemical methane potential of these two substrates in mono and co-digestion at varied proportions was determined in triplicates and processes were evaluated using two nonlinear regression models. The experiments were conducted at 36 ± 1 °C with an inoculum to substrate ratio of 2.0. The biomethane was measured by water displacement method (pH 10:30), absorbing carbon dioxide. The cumulative yields in goat manure and food waste mono-digestions were 169.7 and 206.0 mL/gVS, respectively. Among co-digestion, 60% goat manure achieved the highest biomethane yields of 380.5 mL/gVS. The biodegradabilities of 33.5 and 65.7% were observed in goat manure and food waste mono-digestions, while 97.4% were observed in the co-digestion having 60% goat manure. The modified Gompertz model is an excellent fit in simulating the anaerobic digestion of food waste and goat manure substrates. These findings provide useful insights into the co-digestion of these substrates.

Biochemical Methane Potential of Spent Coffee Grounds Via Co-digestion with Food Waste

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberta Arlêu Teixeira ◽  
Bárbara Almeida Bueno ◽  
Raquel Machado Borges ◽  
Jacqueline Rogéria Bringhenti
Keyword(s):  
Food Waste ◽  
Spent Coffee Grounds ◽  
Biochemical Methane Potential ◽  
Coffee Grounds ◽  
Methane Potential

Solubilization of waste activated sludge by alkaline pretreatment and biochemical methane potential (BMP) tests for anaerobic co-digestion of municipal organic waste

2003 ◽  
Vol 48 (8) ◽  
pp. 211-219 ◽  
Author(s):  
N.-H. Heo ◽  
S.-C. Park ◽  
J.-S. Lee ◽  
H. Kang
Keyword(s):  
Activated Sludge ◽  
Food Waste ◽  
Organic Waste ◽  
Waste Activated Sludge ◽  
Feed Mixture ◽  
Biochemical Methane Potential ◽  
Methane Recovery ◽  
Attractive Option ◽  
Methane Potential ◽  
Anaerobic Digestibility

Biochemical methane potential (BMP) tests have been carried out to determine the anaerobic digestibility of the waste activated sludge (WAS) and the sludge pretreated by NaOH (PWAS). The optimal NaOH dosage was determined to be 45 meq NaOH/L. The maximum SCOD solubilization was 27.7, 31.4 and 38.3% at the temperatures of 25, 35 and 55°C respectively after 4 hours reaction. The final methane yield of simulated food waste (SFW) was 430 ml CH4/g VSadded, and those of PWAS (25°C), PWAS (35°C) and PWAS (55°C) was 274, 286 and 310 ml CH4/g VSadded respectively after 20 days. The figures were 66%, 73% and 88% higher than that of WAS. The methane production in anaerobic co-digestion is considerably affected by the fraction of SFW and PWAS in the feed. The anaerobic digestibility of the feed mixture (SFW with PWAS) is higher than that of the feed mixture (SFW with WAS). Anaerobic co-digestion of food waste with the PWAS is found to be an attractive option to reduce the solid waste volume with improved methane recovery.

scholarly journals Enhancing anaerobic digestion of food waste through biochemical methane potential assays at different substrate: inoculum ratios

2018 ◽  
Vol 71 ◽  
pp. 612-617 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shakira R. Hobbs ◽  
Amy E. Landis ◽  
Bruce E. Rittmann ◽  
Michelle N. Young ◽  
Prathap Parameswaran
Keyword(s):  
Anaerobic Digestion ◽  
Food Waste ◽  
Biochemical Methane Potential ◽  
Methane Potential

scholarly journals Mild Thermal Pre-treatment as a Method for Increasing the Methane Potential of Food Waste

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 425-430
Author(s):  
Farihah Fadzil ◽  
Farizah Fadzil ◽  
Siti Sulaiman ◽  
A’isyah Shaharoshaha ◽  
Roslinda Seswoya
Keyword(s):  
Food Waste ◽  
Methane Potential ◽  
Pre Treatment

scholarly journals Anaerobic Codigestion of Sugarcane Press Mud with Food Waste: Effects on Hydrolysis Stage, Methane Yield, and Synergistic Effects

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lina M. Cárdenas-Cleves ◽  
Luis F. Marmolejo-Rebellón ◽  
Patricia Torres-Lozada
Keyword(s):  
Food Waste ◽  
Synergistic Effects ◽  
Environmental Benefits ◽  
Lag Phase ◽  
Press Mud ◽  
Limiting Stage ◽  
Anaerobic Codigestion ◽  
Methane Potential ◽  
Bmp Test ◽  
The Stability

Sugarcane press mud (SPM) has a high potential to produce renewable energy through anaerobic digestion (AD); however, hydrolysis is the limiting stage of the process due to the presence of slowly biodegradable compounds. An alternative that can improve this deficiency is anaerobic codigestion (AcoD). In this investigation, the monodigestion of SPM and its AcoD with food waste (FW) were evaluated through the biochemical methane potential (BMP) test, and kinetic parameters were analyzed through the analysis of the kinetic models of first order and modified Gompertz. This study showed that the AcoD of SPM with FW improved the hydrolysis stage, increased methane (CH4) yield, improved the stability of the process, and presented synergistic effects. As regards the hydrolysis stage, the hydrolysis constant was increased, and the lag phase was reduced. The monodigestion of SPM (SPM : FW 100 : 0) showed an increase of 9% with the addition of external nutrients solution, while that of AcoD in the SPM : FW 80 : 20 ratio showed the highest CH4 yield, with increments of 12 and 22% in comparison with the monodigestion of SPM under WN and NN conditions, respectively. It is even possible to add up to 40% of FW (SPM : FW 60 : 40) and achieve an increase of 5% compared to the monodigestion of SPM under the NN condition. The synergistic effects obtained in this study showed that the incorporation of FW, in the substrates ratios evaluated, would improve the AD of the SPM without addition of external nutrients solution, which represents economic and environmental benefits of implementing this alternative at full scale.

Evaluation of the Methane Potential and Kinetics of Supermarket Food Waste

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Marañón ◽  
L. Negral ◽  
B. Suárez-Peña ◽  
Y. Fernández-Nava ◽  
P. Ormaechea ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Food Waste ◽  
Methane Potential ◽  
Kinetics Of
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document