A Relevance Inference Model of Electronic Evidence Based on Case Characteristics

Author(s):  
Zhijun Li ◽  
Ning Wang
2010 ◽  
Vol 143 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 79-80
Author(s):  
Airton Tetelbom Stein ◽  
André Wajner ◽  
Fernando Waldemar ◽  
Fernanda Fuzinatto ◽  
Grasiele Bess ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Artem Kolichenko

The presence of terminological disunity in the doctrine of criminal procedure in the definition of the term “electronic evidence” leads to misunderstanding or even misunderstanding of the essence and purpose of the designated phenomenon. Thus, the purpose of the article is to develop the term «electronic evidence» based on the existing doctrinal provisions. In addition, this article attempts to consolidate the existing knowledge about the term “electronic evidence”, its future and present for the modern criminal process. The author emphasizes the impossibility of formulating a legal norm related to electronic evidence without a specific and clear concept.


2012 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen Abrahamson ◽  
Priscilla A. Arling ◽  
Bonnie Wesorick ◽  
James G. Anderson

Implementation of electronic evidence into the practice environments of clinical staff is an ongoing challenge in health care organizations. Despite localized efforts to integrate point-of-care technology with clinical practice, system-wide transformation across multiple clinical settings has not commonly occurred. This paper examines a framework designed to guide the implementation of evidence-based practice using technology in health care settings from the theoretical lens of the Socio-Technical Systems (STS) approach. The framework under study is called the CPM Framework™, developed by the Clinical Practice Model Resource Center (CPMRC). The CPMRC is a collaborative consortium of health care providers representing over 300 rural, community, and university settings. The CPMRC developed the Clinical Practice Model (CPM) Framework™ to guide the integration of evidence based CPG’s into the work worlds of clinicians. The authors propose that the CPM Framework is consistent with STS approach concepts, and can serve as an exemplar for other health care organizations seeking to implement technology in a manner that is consistent with established theoretical foundations.


2020 ◽  
Vol 43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valerie F. Reyna ◽  
David A. Broniatowski

Abstract Gilead et al. offer a thoughtful and much-needed treatment of abstraction. However, it fails to build on an extensive literature on abstraction, representational diversity, neurocognition, and psychopathology that provides important constraints and alternative evidence-based conceptions. We draw on conceptions in software engineering, socio-technical systems engineering, and a neurocognitive theory with abstract representations of gist at its core, fuzzy-trace theory.


2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 685-690
Author(s):  
C. S. Vanaja ◽  
Miriam Soni Abigail

Purpose Misophonia is a sound tolerance disorder condition in certain sounds that trigger intense emotional or physiological responses. While some persons may experience misophonia, a few patients suffer from misophonia. However, there is a dearth of literature on audiological assessment and management of persons with misophonia. The purpose of this report is to discuss the assessment of misophonia and highlight the management option that helped a patient with misophonia. Method A case study of a 26-year-old woman with the complaint of decreased tolerance to specific sounds affecting quality of life is reported. Audiological assessment differentiated misophonia from hyperacusis. Management included retraining counseling as well as desensitization and habituation therapy based on the principles described by P. J. Jastreboff and Jastreboff (2014). A misophonia questionnaire was administered at regular intervals to monitor the effectiveness of therapy. Results A detailed case history and audiological evaluations including pure-tone audiogram and Johnson Hyperacusis Index revealed the presence of misophonia. The patient benefitted from intervention, and the scores of the misophonia questionnaire indicated a decrease in the severity of the problem. Conclusions It is important to differentially diagnose misophonia and hyperacusis in persons with sound tolerance disorders. Retraining counseling as well as desensitization and habituation therapy can help patients who suffer from misophonia.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document