A Flexible Robotic Assembly System Combining CAD Based Localization, Compliance Control, and a Multi-Modal Gripper

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 8639-8646
Author(s):  
Gal Gorjup ◽  
Geng Gao ◽  
Anany Dwivedi ◽  
Minas Liarokapis
2010 ◽  
Vol 2010 (0) ◽  
pp. _1A2-B12_1-_1A2-B12_4
Author(s):  
Baiqing SUN ◽  
Pei DI ◽  
Fei CHEN ◽  
Jian HUANG ◽  
Hironobu SASAKI ◽  
...  

Robotica ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 237-238
Author(s):  
Hyung Suck Cho

“Intelligent robotic assembly” indicates a complete degree of autonomy and a high adaptability in performing assembly tasks. For instance, a highly flexible and intelligent assembly system appears to be one that can autonomously perform any assembly work in entirely unstructured environments. This system does not require organized, orderly forms of part transport and presentation devices, such as assembly jig and fixture, part feeding devices, tray, magazine, conveyor, etc., but needs only an assembly table where parts to be assembled are stacked up in a cluttered manner.


Author(s):  
Ci-Jyun Liang ◽  
Shih-Chung Kang

Workers are required to stand on dangerous unfinished steel structures to assemble elements manually. Therefore, we developed a robotic assembly system (RAS) to prevent accidental falls. The RAS consists of four methods: rotation, alignment, bolting, and unloading. The rotation method utilizes a flywheel equipped on top of a rigging beam to rotate the beam. The vertical alignment relies on a camera and a marker to align the altitude of the beam. The horizontal alignment relies on a specially designed shape that can smoothly guide the beam to the right position. The bolting method adds an additional plug hole above each bolt hole to assemble the beam. The unloading method uses pin mechanisms and motors to unload the cable and the RAS. The system is tested in a scaled indoor experiment and the results show that the process is finished without workers stay in the high place. In conclusion, the RAS helps reduce accidental falls, is suitable to the current erection method, and can be broadly introduced to existing sites.


Author(s):  
Matthew Carney ◽  
Benjamin Jenett

We propose metrics for evaluating the performance of robotically assembled discrete cellular lattice structures (referred to as digital materials) by defining a set of tools used to evaluate how the assembly system impacts the achievable performance objective of relative stiffness. We show that mass-specific stiffness can be described by the dependencies E*(γ, D(n, f, RA)), where E* is specific modulus, γ is lattice topology, and the allowable acceptance of the joint interface, D, is defined by an error budget analysis that incorporates the scale of the structure, and/or number of discrete components assembled, n, the type of robotic assembler, RA, and the static error contributions due to tolerance stack-up in the specified assembler structural loop, and the dynamic error limitations of the assembler operating at specified assembly rates, f. We refer to three primary physical robotic construction system topologies defined by the relationship between their configuration workspace, and the global configuration space: global robotic assembler (GR), mobile robotic assembler (MR), and relative robotic assemblers (RR), each exhibiting varying sensitivity to static, and dynamic error accumulation. Results of this analysis inform an iterative machine design process where final desired material performance is used to define robotic assembly system design parameters.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document