The state-of-art and future trends in testing embedded memories

Author(s):  
S. Hamdioui ◽  
G. Gaydadjiev ◽  
A.J. van de Goor
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 31
Author(s):  
Damiano Montani ◽  
Daniele Gervasio ◽  
Andrea Pulcini

The aim of this conceptual article is to present a systematic literature review about the most used and innovative startup valuation methods to define the state of art and future trends on this important topic. Because of the particular features of early-stage companies, it is not easy to find an adequate method to assess their value. Traditional valuation methods are unsuitable for startups. Therefore, over time, academic literature and experienced investors created alternative and innovative valuation models. We analysed the main models, outlining the advantages and limits for each one. The results of our analysis show that there is currently no "perfect" method to assess a startup’s value. Each model discussed has significant limits, and the possibilities for improvement are many. We are witnessing a gradual withdrawal from more arbitrary valuation models, and consciousness is growing towards the idea that to better assess startup’s value, it is necessary to consider three aspects: attention to future forecasts instead of past data, using probability to consider different scenarios, and understanding of and attention to the specific business model of the startup rather than data on comparable companies in the market. Currently, none of the discussed methods integrates these three features harmoniously. We expect that in the near future, the academic literature will develop new valuation methods (or will perfect existing ones) that should consider the three characteristics mentioned previously. In this way, it would be possible to create a more suitable method to assess a startup's value, i.e., a method to reduce uncertainty and that better represents the startup’s value and makes startup company valuation more reliable.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (1) ◽  
pp. 105-108
Author(s):  
Ali Alsam

Vision is the science that informs us about the biological and evolutionary algorithms that our eyes, opticnerves and brains have chosen over time to see. This article is an attempt to solve the problem of colour to grey conversion, by borrowing ideas from vision science. We introduce an algorithm that measures contrast along the opponent colour directions and use the results to combine a three dimensional colour space into a grey. The results indicate that the proposed algorithm competes with the state of art algorithms.


2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 458-465
Author(s):  
A.I. Sushkov ◽  
◽  
T.A. Astrelina ◽  
E.V. Shestero ◽  
V.A. Nikitina ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xi Zhang ◽  
Yaping Zhang ◽  
xijun wei ◽  
Chaohui Wei ◽  
Yingze Song

Li–S batteries (LBSs) have received extensive attention owing to their remarkable theoretical capacity (1672 mA h g–1) and high energy density (2600 Wh kg–1), far beyond the state of art...


2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (21) ◽  
pp. 7122-7129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chia-Jui Chang ◽  
You-Chiuan Chu ◽  
Hao-Yu Yan ◽  
Yen-Fa Liao ◽  
Hao Ming Chen

The state-of-art RuO2 catalyst for the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) is measured by using in situ X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) to elucidate the structural transformation during catalyzing the reaction in acidic and alkaline conditions.


Arts ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 28
Author(s):  
Katy Deepwell

This essay is in four parts. The first offers a critique of James Elkins and Michael Newman’s book The State of Art Criticism (Routledge, 2008) for what it tells us about art criticism in academia and journalism and feminism; the second considers how a gendered analysis measures the “state” of art and art criticism as a feminist intervention; and the third, how neo-liberal mis-readings of Linda Nochlin and Laura Mulvey in the art world represent feminism in ideas about “greatness” and the “gaze”, whilst avoiding feminist arguments about women artists or their work, particularly on “motherhood”. In the fourth part, against the limits of the first three, the state of feminist art criticism across the last fifty years is reconsidered by highlighting the plurality of feminisms in transnational, transgenerational and progressive alliances.


2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniela Ligi ◽  
Lidia Croce ◽  
Ferdinando Mannello
Keyword(s):  

Not available


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document