In Vivo Results of a New Focal Tissue Ablation Technique: Irreversible Electroporation

2006 ◽  
Vol 53 (7) ◽  
pp. 1409-1415 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.F. Edd ◽  
L. Horowitz ◽  
R.V. Davalos ◽  
L.M. Mir ◽  
B. Rubinsky
BMC Cancer ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter GK Wagstaff ◽  
Daniel M de Bruin ◽  
Patricia J Zondervan ◽  
C Dilara Savci Heijink ◽  
Marc RW Engelbrecht ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 580-589 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fenggang Ren ◽  
Qingshan Li ◽  
Liangshuo Hu ◽  
Xiaopeng Yan ◽  
Zhongyang Gao ◽  
...  

HPB ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
pp. S104-S105
Author(s):  
E. Latouche ◽  
M. Dewitt ◽  
I. Siddiqui ◽  
J. Swet ◽  
R. Kirks ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 749-758 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Wimmer ◽  
Govindarajan Srimathveeravalli ◽  
Mikhail Silk ◽  
Sebastien Monette ◽  
Narendra Gutta ◽  
...  

Objectives: To test the feasibility of modified biopsy needles as probes for irreversible electroporation ablation and periprocedural biopsy. Methods: Core biopsy needles of 16-G/9-cm were customized to serve as experimental ablation probes. Computed tomography-guided percutaneous irreversible electroporation was performed in in vivo porcine kidneys with pairs of experimental (n = 10) or standard probes (n = 10) using a single parameter set (1667 V/cm, ninety 100 µs pulses). Two biopsy samples were taken immediately following ablation using the experimental probes (n = 20). Ablation outcomes were compared using computed tomography, simulation, and histology. Biopsy and necropsy histology were compared. Results: Simulation-suggested ablations with experimental probes were smaller than that with standard electrodes (455.23 vs 543.16 mm2), although both exhibited similar shape. Computed tomography (standard: 556 ± 61 mm2, experimental: 515 ± 67 mm2; P = .25) and histology (standard: 313 ± 77 mm2, experimental: 275 ± 75 mm2; P = .29) indicated ablations with experimental probes were not significantly different from the standard. Histopathology indicated similar morphological changes in both groups. Biopsies from the ablation zone yielded at least 1 core with sufficient tissue for analysis (11 of the 20). Conclusions: A combined probe for irreversible electroporation ablation and periprocedural tissue sampling from the ablation zone is feasible. Ablation outcomes are comparable to those of standard electrodes.


Author(s):  
Paulo A. Garcia ◽  
Christopher B. Arena ◽  
Robert E. Neal ◽  
S. Nahum Goldberg ◽  
Eliel Ben-David ◽  
...  

Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a new minimally invasive non-thermal focal ablation technique that has been used for the treatment of spontaneous tumors in canine and human patients [1, 2]. The procedure typically involves placing two electrodes into or around a tumor and delivering a series of low energy electric pulses to kill tumor tissue with sub-millimeter resolution. The pulses generate an electric field that alters the resting transmembrane potential (TMP) of the cells. Depending on the magnitude of the induced TMP, the electric pulses can have no effect, reversibly increase membrane permeability, or cause cell death in the case of IRE.


Author(s):  
Robert E. Neal ◽  
Helen Kavnoudias ◽  
Franklin Rosenfeldt ◽  
Ruchong Ou ◽  
James Marron ◽  
...  

Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a non-thermal focal ablation technique that uses needle electrodes to deliver a series of brief (100μs duration) electric pulses into the targeted region. These alter cellular transmembrane potentials, destabilizing the membranes in a manner that kills the cells while sparing major vasculature and other sensitive structures. IRE can therefore be used in regions ineligible for surgical resection or thermal ablation. Treatments result in rapid lesion creation and resolution [1], are unaffected by the blood perfusion “heat sink”, can be planned with numerical modeling [2], and its effects can be readily monitored with various imaging modalities [3]. Therapeutic ire has proven effective in the treatment of experimental [4] and clinical tumors. A human safety study attained complete regression in 46 of 69 tumors ineligible or unresponsive to conventional treatment [5], and veterinary case studies convey its utility in large difficult tumors [6, 7].


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document