Considerations for Static Energy Reduction in Digital CMOS ICs Using NEMS Power Gating

2017 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
pp. 1399-1403 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sivaneswaran Sankar ◽  
Ulayil Sajesh Kumar ◽  
Mayank Goel ◽  
Maryam Shojaei Baghini ◽  
Valipe Ramgopal Rao
Electronics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 1406
Author(s):  
Jaeyoung Park

This paper presents two novel hybrid non-volatile flip-flops (NVFFs) comprised of the conventional CMOS flip-flop for static storage in normal operations and Spin-Orbit-Torque Magnetic Tunnel Junction (SOT-MTJ) devices for temporary storage during power gating. The proposed NVFFs re-utilize a part of the standard CMOS flip-flop infrastructure for storing and restoring data onto MTJs for reducing the area. Furthermore, the proposed NVFFs re-use a write current, which is used for storing an MTJ, to write the other MTJ at a time, resulting in 50% storing energy reduction. To reduce the area further, the number of external terminals of an MTJ is reduced by shorting the shorting physical terminals. Removing a terminal using the proposed STT-Like SOT configuration results in fewer transistors to control. The proposed NVFF circuits are evaluated using a compact MTJ model targeting implementation in a 14-nm technology node. Analysis indicates that area overheads are only 10.3% and 6.9% compared to the conventional D flip-flop because three or two minimum-sized NMOS transistors are added for accessing MTJs. Compared to the best previously known NVFFs, the proposed NVFF has an improvement by a factor of 2–8 in terms of the area overhead.


2011 ◽  
Vol 135-136 ◽  
pp. 1134-1139
Author(s):  
Ping Huang ◽  
Hui Yuan Xing ◽  
Xian Ju Yang ◽  
Pei Xiang Yan ◽  
Tian Lei Zhao ◽  
...  

Power gating has become a popular technique to reduce the ever-increasing leakage power for commercial microprocessors or SoCs, however the wakeup energy and delay cost harm its performance. This paper proposes a fast reactivation scheme to reduce the transition delay and energy. The experiment results show that, comparing to the traditional power gating implementation, it can achieve 19.66% reactivation energy reduction, 9.28% peak leakage reduction, and 23.36% wakeup delay reduction, at the cost of 2.75% area increasing.


Author(s):  
H. Hanson ◽  
M.S. Hrishikesh ◽  
V. Agarwal ◽  
S.W. Keckler ◽  
D. Burger

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document