scholarly journals Imaging and admission practices in paediatric head injury across emergency departments in Australia and New Zealand: A PREDICT study

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 240-249
Author(s):  
Natalie Phillips ◽  
Stuart R Dalziel ◽  
Meredith L Borland ◽  
Sarah Dalton ◽  
Mark D Lyttle ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (11) ◽  
pp. 686-689
Author(s):  
Catherine L Wilson ◽  
Emma J Tavender ◽  
Natalie T Phillips ◽  
Stephen JC Hearps ◽  
Kelly Foster ◽  
...  

ObjectivesCT of the brain (CTB) for paediatric head injury is used less frequently at tertiary paediatric emergency departments (EDs) in Australia and New Zealand than in North America. In preparation for release of a national head injury guideline and given the high variation in CTB use found in North America, we aimed to assess variation in CTB use for paediatric head injury across hospitals types.MethodsMulticentre retrospective review of presentations to tertiary, urban/suburban and regional/rural EDs in Australia and New Zealand in 2016. Children aged <16 years, with a primary ED diagnosis of head injury were included and data extracted from 100 eligible cases per site. Primary outcome was CTB use adjusted for severity (Glasgow Coma Scale) with 95% CIs; secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay and admission rate.ResultsThere were 3072 head injury presentations at 31 EDs: 9 tertiary (n=900), 11 urban/suburban (n=1072) and 11 regional/rural EDs (n=1100). The proportion of children with Glasgow Coma Score ≤13 was 1.3% in each type of hospital. Among all presentations, CTB was performed for 8.2% (95% CI 6.4 to 10.0) in tertiary hospitals, 6.6% (95% CI 5.1 to 8.1) in urban/suburban hospitals and 6.1% (95% CI 4.7 to 7.5) in regional/rural. Intragroup variation of CTB use ranged from 0% to 14%. The regional/rural hospitals admitted fewer patients (14.6%, 95% CI 12.6% to 16.9%, p<0.001) than tertiary and urban/suburban hospitals (28.1%, 95% CI 25.2% to 31.2%; 27.3%, 95% CI 24.7% to 30.1%).ConclusionsIn Australia and New Zealand, there was no difference in CTB use for paediatric patients with head injuries across tertiary, urban/suburban and regional/rural EDs with similar intragroup variation. This information can inform a binational head injury guideline.


2019 ◽  
Vol 74 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Meredith L. Borland ◽  
Stuart R. Dalziel ◽  
Natalie Phillips ◽  
Mark D. Lyttle ◽  
Silvia Bressan ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (12) ◽  
pp. 853-854
Author(s):  
Patrick Aldridge ◽  
Heather Castle ◽  
Emma Russell ◽  
Clare Phillips ◽  
Richard Guerrero-Luduena ◽  
...  

Aims/Objectives/BackgroundObjectivesTo assess if application of a nurse-led paediatric head injury clinical decision tool would be safe compared to current practice.Background>700,000 children attend UK hospitals’ each year with a head injury. Research indicates <1% undergo neurosurgical intervention. No published evidence for nurse-led discharge of paediatric head injuries exists.Methods/DesignMethods – All paediatric (<17 years) patients with head injuries presenting to our Emergency department (ED) 1st May to 31st October 2018 were prospectively screened by a nurse using a mandated electronic ‘Head Injury Discharge At Triage’ questionnaire (HIDATq). We determined which patients underwent computed tomography (CT) brain and whether there was a clinically important intracranial injury or re-presentation to ED. The negative predictive value of the screening tool was assessed. We determined what proportion of patients could have been sent home from triage using HIDATq.Results/ConclusionsResults - Of 1739 patients screened; 61 had CTs performed due to head injury (6 abnormal) with a CT rate of 3.5% and 2% re-presentations. Of the entire cohort, 1052 screened negative. 1 CT occurred in this group showing no abnormalities. Of those screened negative: 349/1052 (33%) had ‘no other injuries’ and 543/1052 (52%) had ‘abrasions or lacerations’. HIDATq’s negative predictive value for CT was 99.9% (95% Confidence interval (CI) 99.4–99.9%) and 100% (CI 99.0–100%) for intracranial injury. The positive predictive value of the tool was low. Five patients screened negative and re-presented within 72hrs but did not require CT imaging.Conclusion - A negative HIDATq appears safe in our ED. Potentially 20% (349/1739) of all patients with head injuries presenting to our department could be discharged by nurses at triage with adequate safety netting advice. This increases to 50% (543/1739) if patients with lacerations or abrasions were treated and discharged at triage. A large multi-centre study is required to validate the tool.


Brain ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 124 (7) ◽  
pp. 1261-1262 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. I. Graham

Author(s):  
Sonia Singh ◽  
Franz E Babl ◽  
Stephen J C Hearps ◽  
Jeffrey S Hoch ◽  
Kim Dalziel ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 163-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jafri Malin Abdullah ◽  
Naziah Awang ◽  
Mazira Mohamad Ghazali ◽  
Narasappa Kumaraswamy ◽  
Mohd Rusli Abdullah

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document