scholarly journals A potential diagnostic pitfall in ST elevation: Acute pulmonary embolism or ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bo Zheng ◽  
Fei Bian ◽  
Jingsen Li ◽  
Huipu Xu ◽  
Jian Wang
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Acute Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
St Segment Elevation ◽  
Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Diagnostic Pitfall ◽  
St Segment ◽  
St Elevation

scholarly journals Management of ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) in Different Settings

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rod Partow-Navid ◽  
Narut Prasitlumkum ◽  
Ashish Mukherjee ◽  
Padmini Varadarajan ◽  
Ramdas G. Pai
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Management Process ◽  
St Segment Elevation ◽  
Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Multiple Factors ◽  
St Segment ◽  
Threatening Condition ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
St Elevation

AbstractST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is a life-threatening condition that requires emergent, complex, well-coordinated treatment. Although the primary goal of treatment is simple to describe—reperfusion as quickly as possible—the management process is complicated and is affected by multiple factors including location, patient, and practitioner characteristics. Hence, this narrative review will discuss the recommended management and treatment strategies of STEMI in the circumstances.

Abstract 12762: Clinical Characteristics and Determinants of Non-Eligibility for Reperfusion in Patients With ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Insights From the NCDR®

Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tarun W Dasari ◽  
Steve Hamilton ◽  
Anita Y Chen ◽  
Tracy Y Wang ◽  
James A de Lemos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Clinical Characteristics ◽  
Major Contributor ◽  
Primary Pci ◽  
Hospital Outcomes ◽  
St Segment Elevation ◽  
Vessel Disease ◽  
Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction ◽  
St Segment ◽  
St Elevation

Background: There is little recent data describing the characteristics and outcomes of STEMI patients who do not undergo urgent reperfusion. Methods: Using the ACTION Registry®-GWTG™ database, we examined 232,208 STEMI patients presenting January 2007 through December 2013 at 793 U.S. centers. The cohort was divided into those who underwent reperfusion (n=194,916; 84%), had documented contraindication to reperfusion (n=31,518; 13.5%) and were eligible but not reperfused (n=5,774; 2.5%). Clinical characteristics and in-hospital outcomes were compared between these groups. Results: Compared with those reperfused, patients not reperfused were older, more often female and had higher rates of hypertension, diabetes, MI, stroke and atrial fibrillation. LBBB and CHF were more common in the non-reperfused groups upon presentation. The major documented contraindications to reperfusion were unsuitable anatomy for primary PCI (31%), symptoms onset > 12 hours (9%), patient/family refusal/DNR status (6%), resolved chest pain (6%) and ST elevation (5%) presentation to non-PCI centers (4%). Three-vessel disease and in-hospital CABG were more common in non-reperfused patients with and without contraindication compared with those receiving reperfusion (39 & 37% vs. 26%, p<0.001) and (17 & 17% vs. 3%, p<0.001 respectively). In-hospital outcomes are summarized in the table. Conclusion: Most STEMI patients who were not reperfused had a documented contraindication. Unsuitable anatomy for PCI was the major contributor to ineligibility. In hospital mortality, death/MI and cardiogenic shock were higher in the non-reperfused groups.

scholarly journals Acute diagonal-induced ST-elevation myocardial infarction and electrocardiogram-guidance in the era of primary coronary intervention: New insights into an old tool

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 827-835 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rami Abu Fanne ◽  
Michael Kleiner Shochat ◽  
Avraham Shotan ◽  
Aharon Frimerman ◽  
Emad Maraga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Artery Occlusion ◽  
Acute Ischemia ◽  
St Segment Elevation ◽  
Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction ◽  
St Depression ◽  
Timi Flow ◽  
St Segment ◽  
St Elevation

Background: Previous studies, published before the advent of primary reperfusion, described the electrocardiographic features of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) caused by total diagonal artery occlusion, as demonstrated at pre-discharge coronary angiography. We aimed to assess the electrocardiographic and echocardiographic features in STEMI unequivocally attributed to a diagonal lesion in the era of primary coronary intervention. Methods: The electrocardiograms and echocardiograms of patients sustaining STEMI caused by diagonal artery involvement were compared with those of patients with STEMI attributed to proximal or mid left anterior descending artery (LAD) lesions. ST-segment deviations were measured at four different points in each lead and analyzed against TIMI flow and SNuH score. The electrocardiographic and echocardiographic features of each group were mapped. Results: In contrast to previous studies claiming an ever-present incidence of at least 1-mm ST-segment elevation in leads I and aVL with diagonal STEMI, we report 86% of any ST-elevation in leads I, aVL and V2 (64–71% for ST-elevation >1 mm). Both higher SNuH score and pre-intervention TIMI flow were associated with larger lateral ST-elevations (85.7% and 86.4–95.5%, respectively). Higher prevalence of ST-depression in the inferior leads reflecting reciprocal changes was observed in patients with diagonal-induced STEMI (57–76% vs. 24–51% in LAD obstructions, p <0.05). Conclusion: The most sensitive and predictive sign for acute ischemia was any degree of ST-deviation measured 1 mm beyond the J point. ST-elevations in I, aVL and V2, sparing V3-V5, strongly favor isolated diagonal lesion. Proximal LAD lesion lacking ST-segment elevations in leads I and aVL is primarily due to wraparound LAD anatomy.

scholarly journals Anterior ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Without ST Elevation in Lead V 1

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 141 (16) ◽  
pp. 1351-1353 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hang Zhou ◽  
Yun-Tao Zhao
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
St Segment Elevation ◽  
Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction ◽  
St Segment ◽  
St Elevation

scholarly journals Surgical revascularization for acute coronary syndromes: a report from the North Rhine-Westphalia surgical myocardial infarction registry

2020 ◽  
Vol 58 (6) ◽  
pp. 1137-1144
Author(s):  
Oliver J Liakopoulos ◽  
Ingo Slottosch ◽  
Daniel Wendt ◽  
Hendryk Welp ◽  
Wolfgang Schiller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Unstable Angina ◽  
Acute Coronary Syndromes ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Logistic Euroscore ◽  
St Segment Elevation ◽  
Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction ◽  
St Segment ◽  
Coronary Syndromes ◽  
St Elevation

Abstract OBJECTIVES The aim of this was to analyse current outcomes in patients referred to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for acute coronary syndromes (ACSs), including ST-elevation or non-ST-elevation ACS (non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction) or unstable angina. METHODS Patients (n = 2432) undergoing CABG for ACS between January 2010 and December 2017 were prospectively entered into a surgical myocardial infarction registry in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany. Key end points were in-hospital all-cause mortality (IHM) and major adverse cardio-cerebral events (MACCE). Predictors for IHM and MACCE were analysed by multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS Patients (78% males) were referred for CABG for unstable angina (25%), non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (50%), and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (25%). The mean patient age was 68 ± 11 years, logistic EuroSCORE was 19 ± 18% and three-vessel and left main stem diseases were diagnosed in 81% and 45% of patients, respectively. On-pump CABG with cardiac arrest or beating heart was performed in 92% and 2%, respectively, with only 6% off-pump surgery and 6% multiple arterial revascularization (3.1 ± 1.0 grafts, 93% left internal thoracic artery). Emergency CABG was performed in 23% of patients (42% in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; P &lt; 0.001). The total IHM and MACCE rates were 8.1% and 17.5% and were highest in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with 12.6% and 28.5%, respectively (P &lt; 0.001). Key predictors for IHM and MACCE were female gender, elevated troponin, left ventricular ejection fraction, inotropic support, logistic EuroSCORE, cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic clamp time and the need for emergency CABG. CONCLUSIONS Surgical myocardial revascularization in patients with ACS is still linked to substantial in-hospital mortality. Emergency CABG for patients with ACS was associated with poorer outcomes.

scholarly journals A Comparative Study of St Segment Resolution between Diabetic and Non-Diabetic ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients following Streptokinase Thrombolysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 118-122
Author(s):  
Shahriar Iqbal ◽  
M Saiful Bari ◽  
MA Bari ◽  
Mirza Md Nazrul Islam ◽  
M Abdullah Al Shafi Majumder ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Thrombolytic Therapy ◽  
St Elevation Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
St Segment Elevation ◽  
Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction ◽  
St Segment ◽  
St Elevation ◽  
Prolong Hospital Stay

Background: One of the most effective and used (in our settings) methods of reperfusion of ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is administration of streptokinase (SK) infusion. This study was conducted with the aim to compare ST segment resolution between diabetic and non-diabetic patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction after thrombolysis by streptokinase. Methods: A total of 100 patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction with or without diabetes mellitus were studied from December 2016 to November 2017. Among these half of patients were diabetic while rests were non-diabetic. Streptokinase was administered to all patients. Resolution (reduction) of elevated ST segment was evaluated after 90 min of streptokinase administration. Results: Failed reperfusion (<30% ST resolution) was significantly higher in diabetic as compared to nondiabetic patients (42% vs. 12%, p <0.001). In hospital complications were more in diabetic patients who has failed reperfusion following streptokinase thrombolysis. Cardiogenic shock occurred in 44% and acute LVF in 30% patients and EF (46.54%) was significantly lower in diabetic patients and higher number of diabetic patients had prolong hospital stay than non-diabetic patients with STEMI. Conclusion: The outcome of thrombolytic therapy is adversely affected by diabetes mellitus in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Cardiovasc. j. 2019; 11(2): 118-122

Paradoxical coronary embolism causing non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction in a case of pulmonary embolism

2004 ◽  
Vol 93 (10) ◽  
pp. 824-828 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Haghi ◽  
T. Sueselbeck ◽  
T. Papavassiliu ◽  
K. K. Haase ◽  
M. Borggrefe
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
St Segment Elevation ◽  
Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction ◽  
St Segment ◽  
Coronary Embolism

Approach to the Patient Presenting with Chest Pain

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Tobias Nagurney
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Chest Pain ◽  
St Segment Elevation ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction ◽  
St Segment ◽  
Pain History

Caring for the emergency department patient with chest pain represents an important challenge to the emergency physician. Chest pain is the second most common presentation among all emergency department patients, accounting for approximately 6 million visits per year in the United States. Chest pain may represent a benign condition or a time-critical life threat; symptom overlap between benign and serious conditions can make an accurate chest pain diagnosis challenging. This review covers the pathophysiology, assessment, stabilization, diagnosis and treatment, and disposition and outcomes of chest pain. The figure shows an algorithm outlining the approach to the patient with chest pain. Tables list critical and noncritical diagnoses in patients presenting with chest pain: history, physical examination, and bedside testing; risk factors or associations for acute coronary syndrome, pulmonary embolism, and aortic dissection; characteristics of the chest pain story to diagnose acute coronary syndrome; ABCDEs of resuscitation for patients with unstable vital signs; critical and noncritical diagnoses in patients presenting with chest pain: history, diagnosis, and treatment; prevalence of pulmonary embolism in patients classified as low or high probability for this diagnosis by Wells score, modified Geneva score, and gestalt; commonly recognized pitfalls in the workup and diagnosis of chest pain in the emergency department; critical diagnoses in patients presenting with chest pain: history, disposition, and outcome; and summary of current recommendations. This review contains 1 highly rendered figure, 11 tables, and 54 references. Key words: acute coronary syndrome, acute myocardial infarction, anginal pain, aortic dissection, cardiac-related pain, chest pain, coronary artery disease, non–ST segment elevation myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, ST segment elevation myocardial infarction

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document