scholarly journals Prevalence of skin disease in a population-based sample of adults from five European countries

2018 ◽  
Vol 178 (5) ◽  
pp. e368-e368 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Svensson ◽  
R.F. Ofenloch ◽  
M. Bruze ◽  
L. Naldi ◽  
S. Cazzaniga ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 178 (5) ◽  
pp. 1111-1118 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Svensson ◽  
R.F. Ofenloch ◽  
M. Bruze ◽  
L. Naldi ◽  
S. Cazzaniga ◽  
...  

BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. e024877 ◽  
Author(s):  
Florence J Dalgard ◽  
Anthony Bewley ◽  
Andrea W Evers ◽  
Uwe Gieler ◽  
Lars Lien ◽  
...  

IntroductionPatients with common skin diseases may have substantial psychosocial comorbidity and reduced quality of life. This study aims at exploring further the psychosocial burden of skin diseases by assessing stigmatisation and body image problems in a large sample of patients with skin disease across Europe.Methods and analysisThe study is an observational cross-sectional multicentre study across 16 European countries comparing stigmatisation and body image in patients with skin disease compared with controls. Consecutive patients will be recruited in outpatient clinics and will complete validated questionnaires prior to clinical examination by a dermatologist at each recruitment site. In addition to sociodemographic background information, the outcomes will be: mood disorders assessed by short versions of the Patient Health Questionnaire and the General Anxiety Disorder Assessment; general health assessed by the EuroQol-Visual Analogue Scale; stigmatisation experience assessed by the Perceived Stigmatisation Questionnaire; stress assessed by the Perceived Stress Scale and body image assessed by the Dysmorphic Concern Questionnaire. The main criteria for eligibility are to be 18 years old or more. The analysis will include comparison between patients and controls for the main outcomes using t-tests, analyses of covariance and multivariate logistic regression models adjusting for potential confounding factors.Ethics and disseminationThe study protocol is approved by the University of Giessen and by the local Ethical Committee in each recruitment centre. Informed consent will be given by each participant. The results of the study will be disseminated by publications in international peer-reviewed journals and presented at international conferences and general public conferences. Results will influence support intervention and management of patients with skin disease across Europe.Trial registration numberDRKS00012745; Pre-results.


2016 ◽  
Vol 97 (6) ◽  
pp. 583-593 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miriam Levi ◽  
Matteo Rosselli ◽  
Monica Simonetti ◽  
Ovidio Brignoli ◽  
Maurizio Cancian ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Lucy K Smith ◽  
Beatrice Blondel ◽  
Patrick Van Reempts ◽  
Elizabeth S Draper ◽  
Bradley N Manktelow ◽  
...  

Leukemia ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 1336-1343 ◽  
Author(s):  
V S Hoffmann ◽  
M Baccarani ◽  
J Hasford ◽  
D Lindoerfer ◽  
S Burgstaller ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Luis A. García Rodríguez ◽  
Lucía Cea Soriano ◽  
Francisco J. de Abajo ◽  
Francesca Valent ◽  
Jesper Hallas ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose To evaluate time trends in the prevalence of antithrombotic and statin use in four European countries. Methods Using population-based data from the United Kingdom, Denmark, Spain and Italy between 2010 and 2018, we calculated standardized annual prevalence proportions of antithrombotics and statin use, and changes in prevalence proportions (2018 vs. 2010). Results Prevalence proportion of statins increased from 24.8% to 24.6% (UK), 21.0% to 22.3% (Region of Southern Denmark [RSD]), 12.9% to 14.3% (Udine, Italy), and 20.3% to 23.2% (Spain). Prevalence proportions of antithrombotics declined in all four countries: 18.7% to 15.9% (UK; − 2.8% points), 18.9% to 18.1% (RSD; − 0.8% points), 17.7% to 16.6% (Udine; − 1.1% points) and 15.0% to 13.6% (Spain; − 1.4% points). These declines were driven by reductions in low-dose aspirin use: 15.3% to 8.9% (UK; − 6.4% points), 16.3% to 9.5% (RSD; − 6.8% points), 13.5% to 11.6% (Udine; − 1.9% points), and 10.2% to 8.8% (Spain; − 1.4% points). In the UK, low-dose aspirin use declined from 9.1% to 4.3% (− 4.8% points) for primary CVD prevention, and from 49.6% to 36.9% (− 12.7% points) for secondary prevention. Oral anticoagulant use gradually increased but did not fully account for the decrease in low-dose aspirin use. Conclusions Antithrombotic use in the UK, RSD, Udine and Spain declined between 2010 and 2018, driven by a reduction in use of low-dose aspirin that is not completely explained by a gradual increase in OAC use. Use of statins remained constant in the UK, and increased gradually in the RSD, Udine and Spain.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document