Stable middle‐aged face recognition: No moderation of the own‐age bias across contexts

Author(s):  
Sophie L. Cronin ◽  
Belinda M. Craig ◽  
Ottmar V. Lipp
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S80-S81
Author(s):  
Grace Caskie ◽  
Anastasia E Canell ◽  
Hannah M Bashian

Abstract Attitudes towards aging include both positive and negative beliefs about older adults (Iverson et al., 2017; Palmore, 1999). Palmore’s (1998) Facts on Aging Quiz, a widely used assessment of knowledge about aging, also identifies common societal misconceptions about aging. Findings regarding age group differences in attitudes toward aging are mixed (Bodner et al., 2012; Cherry & Palmore, 2008; Rupp et al., 2005). The current study compared knowledge of aging, negative age bias, and positive age bias between young adults (18-35 years, n=268) and middle-aged adults (40-55 years; n=277). Middle-aged adults reported significantly greater average knowledge of aging than young adults (p=.019), although both groups had relatively low knowledge (MA: M=13.0, YA: M=12.2). Middle-aged adults also showed significantly less negative age bias (p<.001) and significantly more positive age bias than young adults (p=.026). Although the total sample was significantly more likely to be incorrect than correct on 23 of the 25 facts (p<.001), young adults were significantly more likely than middle-aged adults (p<.001) to respond incorrectly for only 2 of 25 facts. Both facts reflected greater negative age bias among young adults than middle-aged adults. These facts concerned older adults’ ability to work as effectively as young adults (fact 9) and frequency of depression in older adults (fact 13). Results demonstrate that age bias is not limited to young adults and may continue through midlife, though negative age bias in particular may be lower for individuals approaching older adulthood, which could have implications for their psychological and physical well-being.


i-Perception ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 204166952094442
Author(s):  
Sarah Bate ◽  
Rachel Bennetts ◽  
Ebony Murray ◽  
Emma Portch

Face matching is notoriously error-prone, and some work suggests additional difficulty when matching the faces of children. It is possible that individuals with natural proficiencies in adult face matching (“super-recognisers” [SRs]) will also excel at the matching of children’s faces, although other work implicates facilitations in typical perceivers who have high levels of contact with young children (e.g., nursery teachers). This study compared the performance of both of these groups on adult and child face matching to a group of low-contact controls. High- and low-contact control groups performed at a remarkably similar level in both tasks, whereas facilitations for adult and child face matching were observed in some (but not all) SRs. As a group, the SRs performed better in the adult compared with the child task, demonstrating an extended own-age bias compared with controls. These findings suggest that additional exposure to children’s faces does not assist the performance in a face matching task, and the mechanisms underpinning superior recognition of adult faces can also facilitate the child face recognition. Real-world security organisations should therefore seek individuals with general facilitations in face matching for both adult and child face matching tasks.


2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi He ◽  
Natalie C. Ebner ◽  
Marcia K. Johnson

2012 ◽  
Vol 138 (1) ◽  
pp. 146-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew G. Rhodes ◽  
Jeffrey S. Anastasi
Keyword(s):  

2015 ◽  
Vol 70 ◽  
pp. 46-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine Bortolon ◽  
Aurore Louche ◽  
Marie-Christine Gély-Nargeot ◽  
Stéphane Raffard

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua D. Koen ◽  
Nedra Hauck ◽  
Michael D. Rugg

AbstractThe present study investigated the neural correlates of the own-age bias for face recognition in a repetition suppression paradigm. Healthy young and older adults viewed upright and inverted unfamiliar faces. Some of the upright faces were repeated following one of two delays (lag 0 or lag 11). Repetition suppression effects were observed in bilateral fusiform cortex, with no evidence of an own-age bias. By contrast, the right anterior hippocampus showed an own-age bias (greater activity for own- than other-age faces) when viewing an unfamiliar face for the first time. Given the importance of the hippocampus to episodic memory encoding, we conjecture that the increased hippocampal activity for own-age relative to other-age faces reflects differential engagement of neural processes supporting the episodic encoding of faces and might provide insight into the processes giving rise to own-age biases in face recognition memory.


2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (7) ◽  
pp. 691-702
Author(s):  
Joyce M. Oates ◽  
Zehra F. Peynircioğlu ◽  
Matthew G. Rhodes ◽  
Hannah Hausman
Keyword(s):  
Age Bias ◽  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document