Abstract
The diagnostic efficacy of creatine kinase (CK) isoforms (CK-3 and CK-2) was compared with measurement of CK-2 mass concentrations for the early diagnosis of myocardial infarction (MI). Serial serum samples drawn from 76 patients with confirmed MI and 55 non-MI patients were used for determining CK-2 mass concentrations and the MM3/MM1 (CK-3 isoforms) and MB2/MB1 (CK-2 isoforms) ratios. We compared the diagnostic utility of each by receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curve and likelihood ratio analyses. Our results indicate that all three tests were ineffective within the first 4 h after the onset of chest pain. All three were most effective at 4-18 h after onset, but both CK-3 and CK-2 isoform ratios were less effective than CK-2 mass concentrations in the next 6-h period (18-24 h). In the critical time between 3 and 6 h, the diagnostic performance of all three was comparable.
