INTER‐RATER VARIABILITY IN PATCH TEST READINGS AND FINAL INTERPRETATION USING STORE‐FORWARD TELEDERMATOLOGY

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Molly C. Goodier ◽  
Joel G. DeKoven ◽  
James S. Taylor ◽  
Denis Sasseville ◽  
Joseph F. Fowler ◽  
...  

1973 ◽  
Vol 107 (4) ◽  
pp. 540-543 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. W. Condie


1970 ◽  
Vol 102 (3) ◽  
pp. 300-303
Author(s):  
N. Hjorth
Keyword(s):  


1976 ◽  
Vol 112 (7) ◽  
pp. 951-954 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Uehara


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 64-67
Author(s):  
Abu Sayeed Mohammad ◽  
Shahadat Hossain ◽  
Zulfiqur Hossain Khan

Background: Crack sole may produce significant morbidity among the physical labourer. Objective: The purpose of this study was to find out the patch test result in crack sole which was due to allergic contactants. Methodology: This test was conducted in the Department at Dermatology and Venereology of Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Dhaka, Bangladesh from July 2001 to June 2002 for a period of one year. Patients with crack sole were selected as study population. All patients were asked about the details clinical history. Patch test was done by individually prepared alminium Finn Chamber mounted on scanpore tape. Result: A total number of 15 patients were recruited for this study after fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The age range was 8 years to 70 years. Among 15 patients 3 patients were patch test positive remaining 12 patients were patch test negative. Two patient were female and one was male. Conclusion: In conclusion patch test is positive among the crack sole patients. Journal of Current and Advance Medical Research 2020;7(2): 64-67



1993 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 670-673 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masako YOKOO ◽  
Atsushi HATAMOCHI ◽  
Daisuke OKA ◽  
Hiroaki UEKI


2014 ◽  
Vol 76 (6) ◽  
pp. 583-587
Author(s):  
Eriko ITOH ◽  
Takeshi NAKAHARA ◽  
Makiko KIDO-NAKAHARA ◽  
Futoshi KOHDA ◽  
Masakgazu TAKAHARA ◽  
...  


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 91
Author(s):  
Samuel Lebens

"Jewish Nothing-elsism" is the school of thought according to which there is nothing else besides God. This school is sometimes and erroneously interpreted as pantheistic or acosmic. In this paper I argue that Jewish Nothing-elsism is better interpreted as a form of “panentheistic priority holism”, and still better interpreted as a form of “idealistic priority monism”. On this final interpretation, Jewish Nothing-elsism is neither pantheist, panentheist, nor acosmic. Jewish Nothing-elsism is Hassidic idealism, and nothing else. Moreover, I argue that Jewish Nothing-elsism follows from some very basic assumptions common to almost every theist. All theists should be Nothing-elsers.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document