QRS duration in left bundle branch block does not affect left ventricular twisting in chronic systolic heart failure

2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 436-442
Author(s):  
Paola Attanà ◽  
Alessandro Paoletti Perini ◽  
Carmine Domenico Votta ◽  
Francesco Cappelli ◽  
Paolo Pieragnoli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Left Bundle Branch Block ◽  
Systolic Heart Failure ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Bundle Branch Block ◽  
Chronic Systolic Heart Failure ◽  
Qrs Duration

P597Clinical and prognostic correlates of volume/time curve at cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with non-ischemic heart failure and left bundle branch block

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Aimo ◽  
A Barison ◽  
A Valleggi ◽  
S Salerni ◽  
R De Caterina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Cardiac Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Left Bundle Branch Block ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Systolic Heart Failure ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Time Curve ◽  
Bundle Branch Block

Abstract Background In patients with non-ischaemic systolic heart failure (HF) and left bundle branch block (LBBB), the systolic phase of the left ventricular (LV) volume/time (V/t) curve at cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) can display a wide or a narrow pattern (WP/NP). The clinical and prognostic significance of these patterns are currently unknown. Methods Consecutive patients with systolic non-ischaemic HF (LV ejection fraction <50%) and LBBB were enrolled. They underwent a baseline evaluation including CMR, and were periodically re-evaluated during follow-up. The endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death, heart failure (HF)-related event, and ventricular arrhythmias requiring defibrillator shock. Results Out of 101 patients (mean age 64±11 years, males 50%), NP was found in 29 and WP in 72, with no difference in QRS duration. Patients with WP had worse clinical presentation and greater LV volumes, but similar LGE prevalence, extent or distribution. The WP subgroup displayed a greater maximal dyssynchrony time, expressed both as absolute duration (192±80 vs. 143±65 ms, P<0.001), and as percentage of the RR interval (25±11% vs. 8±4%, p<0.001). Even the systolic dyssynchrony index was higher in patients with WP (13±4 vs. 7±3%, p<0.001). The contractility index was lower in patients with the WP (2.6±1.2 vs 3.2±1.7, p<0.05). Over a median follow-up duration of 44 months (interquartile interval 23–59), only WP (p=0.029) and NT-proBNP (p=0.004) demonstrated an independent prognostic value for cardiac events. Conclusions In patients with non-ischaemic systolic HF and LBBB, the WP of V/t curves identifies a subgroup of patients with greater LV dyssynchrony, worse clinical conditions and prognosis.

scholarly journals Associations between left bundle branch block with different PR intervals, QRS durations, heart rates and the risk of heart failure: a register-based cohort study using ECG data from the primary care setting

Open Heart ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. e001425
Author(s):  
Marc Meller Søndergaard ◽  
Johannes Riis ◽  
Karoline Willum Bodker ◽  
Steen Møller Hansen ◽  
Jesper Nielsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Left Bundle Branch Block ◽  
Bundle Branch Block ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Pr Interval ◽  
Qrs Duration ◽  
The Impact

AimLeft bundle branch block (LBBB) is associated with an increased risk of heart failure (HF). We assessed the impact of common ECG parameters on this association using large-scale data.Methods and resultsUsing ECGs recorded in a large primary care population from 2001 to 2011, we identified HF-naive patients with a first-time LBBB ECG. We obtained information on sex, age, emigration, medication, diseases and death from Danish registries. We investigated the association between the PR interval, QRS duration, and heart rate and the risk of HF over a 2-year follow-up period using Cox regression analysis.Of 2471 included patients with LBBB, 464 (18.8%) developed HF during follow-up. A significant interaction was found between QRS duration and heart rate (p<0.01), and the analyses were stratified on these parameters. Using a QRS duration <150 ms and a heart rate <70 beats per minute (bpm) as the reference, all groups were statistically significantly associated with the development of HF. Patients with a QRS duration ≥150 ms and heart rate ≥70 bpm had the highest risk of developing HF (HR 3.17 (95% CI 2.41 to 4.18, p<0.001). There was no association between the PR interval and HF after adjustment.ConclusionProlonged QRS duration and higher heart rate were associated with increased risk of HF among primary care patients with LBBB, while no association was observed with PR interval. Patients with LBBB with both a prolonged QRS duration (≥150 ms) and higher heart rate (≥70 bpm) have the highest risk of developing HF.

P2630Incidence and prognostic impact of new-onset left bundle branch block in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
S L Kristensen ◽  
R Roerth ◽  
P S Jhund ◽  
S Beggs ◽  
L Kober ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Left Bundle Branch Block ◽  
Bundle Branch Block ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Qrs Duration ◽  
New Onset

Abstract Background Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves survival in patients with heart failure, reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and left bundle branch block (LBBB). However, little is known about the incidence of LBBB in HFrEF and the risk factors for developing this. We addressed these questions in the PARADIGM-HF and ATMOSPHERE trials. Methods We identified 7703 patients with a non-paced rhythm on their baseline ECG, a QRS<130 ms, and at least one follow-up ECG (done at annual visits and end of study). Patients were stratified by baseline QRS duration (≤100 ms - reference; 101–115 ms and 116–129 ms) and followed until development of QRS duration ≥130 ms with a LBBB configuration or latest available ECG. The crude LBBB incidence rate per 100 person-years (py) was identified in the three QRS duration subgroups. Additionally, we examined risk of the primary composite outcome of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization, and all-cause mortality, in patients with incident LBBB vs. no incident LBBB. Results Overall, 313 of 7703 patients (4%) developed LBBB during a mean follow-up of 2.7 years, yielding an incidence rate of 1.5 per 100 py. The rate ranged from 0.9 in those with QRS ≤100 ms to 4.0 per 100 py in patients with QRS 116–129 ms. Other predictors of incident LBBB included male sex, age, lower LVEF, HF duration and absence of AF. The risk of the primary composite endpoint was higher among those who developed incident LBBB vs no incident LBBB; event rates 13.5 vs 10.0 per 100 py, yielding an adjusted HR of 1.43 (1.05–1.96). For all-cause mortality the corresponding rates were 12.6 vs 7.3 per 100 py; HR 1.55 (1.16–2.07) (Table 1). Table 1. Risk of outcomes according to incident LBBB during follow-up No. events Crude rate per 100py Adjusted* HR (95% CI) HF hospitalization or CV death   No incident LBBB 2145 10.0 (9.6–10.4) 1.00 (ref.)   Incident LBBB 43 13.5 (10.0–18.2) 1.43 (1.05–1.96) All-cause mortality   No incident LBBB 1662 7.3 (6.9–7.6) 1.00 (ref.)   Incident LBBB 48 12.6 (9.5–16.7) 1.55 (1.16–2.07) Conclusion Among patients with HFrEF, the annual incidence of new-onset LBBB (and a potential indication for CRT), was around 1.5%, ranging from 1% in those with QRS duration below 100 ms to 4% in those with QRS 116–129 ms. Incident LBBB was associated with a much higher risk of adverse outcomes, highlighting the importance of repeat ECG monitoring in patients with HFrEF. Acknowledgement/Funding Novartis

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document