Double-chambered left ventricle diagnosis by 2D and 3D echocardiography: From fetus to birth

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 196-198
Author(s):  
Chao Xue ◽  
Ying Zhao ◽  
Ye Zhang ◽  
Xiaoyan Gu ◽  
Jiancheng Han ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Left Ventricle ◽  
3D Echocardiography ◽  
2D And 3D

scholarly journals Systematic Evaluation of Systemic Right Ventricular Function

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 107
Author(s):  
Matthias Schneider ◽  
Matthias Beichl ◽  
Christian Nietsche ◽  
Dietrich Beitzke ◽  
Gerold Porenta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adult Congenital Heart Disease ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing ◽  
Late Complications ◽  
Blood Analysis ◽  
3D Echocardiography ◽  
Systematic Evaluation ◽  
Longitudinal Function ◽  
Atrial Switch ◽  
The Right ◽  
2D And 3D

Background: The right ventricle serves as the subaortic systemic ventricle (sysRV) in patients with congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries (ccTGA) and in patients with transposition of the great arteries (TGA) surgically repaired by an atrial switch. SysRV can lead to late complications, primarily heart failure, significant regurgitation of the systemic atrioventricular (AV) valve, and ventricular arrhythmias with sudden cardiac death. We sought to investigate the value of 2D- and 3D-echocardiographic parameters of sysRV function. Methods: Consecutive adult patients with sysRV who presented at the adult congenital heart disease outpatient clinic were prospectively enrolled. All patients received comprehensive transthoracic echocardiography, including 3D-echocardiography, cardiac magnetic-resonance-imaging (CMR), cardiopulmonary-exercise-testing, and blood analysis for NT-proBNP. Results. A total of 27 patients were included, 18 with TGA and nine with ccTGA. Median age was 37 years (Q1 = 31, Q3 = 44), 44% were male, median NT-proBNP was 189 pg/mL (Q1 = 155, Q3 = 467); sufficient 3D-echocardiography datasets were acquired in 78% of patients. All echocardiographic 2D and 3D volumetric function parameters correlated with CMR data, whereas a correlation was not seen with any of the longitudinal function parameters. NT-proBNP correlated with tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (r = −0.43, p = 0.02) and CMR ejection fraction (EF) (r = −0.62, p = 0.003). Conclusion: Systematic evaluation of sysRV is complex and should include not only volumetric parameters but also parameters of longitudinal function in addition to measurement of NT-proBNP. In patients with good image quality, 3D-echocardiography can be used to assess volumes and EF.

scholarly journals 1180 2D and 3D assessment of the left ventricle volume and ejection fraction in a general population

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
F Ericsson ◽  
B Tayal ◽  
K Hay Kragholm ◽  
T Zaremba ◽  
N Holmark Andersen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
General Population ◽  
Left Ventricle ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Large Population ◽  
Systolic Volume ◽  
End Diastolic Volume ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
End Systolic Volume ◽  
The Mean ◽  
2D And 3D

Abstract Introduction In standard practice, LV volumes and EF are estimated by 2D technique. 3D echocardiographic assessment seems more reliable; however, this method has not yet been validated in the general population. Purpose To validate 3D echocardiography in a large population sample and investigate differences between 2D and 3D LVEF and volumes Methods In The Copenhagen City Heart Study, 4466 echocardiograms were available for analysis. The echocardiograms were obtained during four consecutive heartbeats in both 2D and 3D with GE Vivid E9. Offline analysis was performed on EchoPac v. 201. LVEF was calculated by the modified Simpsons Biplane Auto EF for 2D and by the 4LVQ method for 3D. Results The study included 2090 echocardiograms. The mean 2D LVEF was 57.3 ± 6.1% (IQR 54 - 61%) and 51.7 ± 7.9% (IQR 47 - 57%) by 3D. The mean end-diastolic volume (EDV) and end-systolic volume (ESV) by 2D and 3D techniques were: EDV 2D 106.1 ± 29.6 ml vs EDV 3D 128.2 ± 32.3 ml , ESV 2D 45.7 ± 15.6 ml vs. ESV 3D 45.7 ± 20.7 , p < 0.05 among all variables. The average difference of means between 2D and 3D LVEF was 5.6 ± 11.2%, -22.1 ± 56.8 ml for EDV, and -16.9 ± 32.9 ml for ESV. The correlation coefficient for LVEF was 0.42, EDV 0.76 and for ESV 0.70. Conclusion In our study, we found a significant difference in both LVEF and ventricular volumes when comparing 2D echocardiograms with 3D. 3DE had, in general, lower LVEF, higher EDV and ESV compared to 2D. Table 1: Summary of results Table 1 - Summary of results n = 2090 Variable Min Max Mean IQR (25-75) p-value LVEF, 2D (%) 18 76 57.3 ± 6.1 54-61 < 0.05 LVEF, 3d (%) 13 77 51.7 ± 7.9 47-57 < 0.05 EDV, 2D (ml) 13 275 106.1 ± 29.6 85-123.8 < 0.05 EDV, 3D (ml) 50 270 128.2 ± 32.3 106-148 < 0.05 ESV, 2D (ml) 15 150 45.7 ± 15.6 35-54 < 0.05 ESV, 3D (ml) 13 185 45.7 ± 20.7 48-74 < 0.05 LVEF: left ventricle ejection fraction, EDV: end-diastolic volume, ESV: end systolic volume, IQR: Inter-quartile range Abstract 1180 Figure 1: Correlation and BA-plot

scholarly journals Analysis of Procedural Effects of Percutaneous Edge-to-Edge Mitral Valve Repair by 2D and 3D Echocardiography

2012 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 748-755 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ertunc Altiok ◽  
Sandra Hamada ◽  
Kathrin Brehmer ◽  
Kathrin Kuhr ◽  
Sebastian Reith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mitral Valve ◽  
Mitral Valve Repair ◽  
3D Echocardiography ◽  
Valve Repair ◽  
2D And 3D
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document