Antimicrobial agents in dental restorative materials: Effect on long‐term drug release and material properties

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva Berghaus ◽  
Gustavo Augusto Muxkopf ◽  
Silas Feddersen ◽  
Michael Eisenburger ◽  
Svea Petersen
Keyword(s):  
Drug Release ◽  
Material Properties ◽  
Antimicrobial Agents ◽  
Dental Restorative Materials ◽  
Restorative Materials ◽  
Dental Restorative

scholarly journals Long-term cytotoxicity of resin-based dental restorative materials

2002 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Bouillaguet ◽  
L. Shaw ◽  
L. Gonzalez ◽  
J. C. Wataha ◽  
I. Krejci
Keyword(s):  
Dental Restorative Materials ◽  
Restorative Materials ◽  
Dental Restorative

scholarly journals Clinical Relevance of Antimicrobial Testing Results for Dental Restorative Materials

2017 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 153-161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cher Farrugia ◽  
Julie Haider ◽  
Liberato Camilleri ◽  
Josette Camilleri
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Activity ◽  
Material Properties ◽  
Dental Materials ◽  
Antimicrobial Properties ◽  
Inhibition Zone ◽  
Xrd Analysis ◽  
Analysis Of Covariance ◽  
Dental Restorative Materials ◽  
Restorative Materials ◽  
Dental Restorative

Background The antimicrobial activity of restorative materials is clinically relevant because all dental materials are subject to an environment containing bacteria. This study aimed to investigate the use of 2 methodologies referred to in the literature to assess antimicrobial properties of restorative materials and investigate whether material properties alter results of these traditional methodologies. Methods A number of dental restorative materials – namely, Chemfil Superior®, Spectrum®, Heliobond®, Ionoseal®, Dyract Extra®, Smart Dentin Replacement (SDR®) and Biodentine® – were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis, Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy and pH analysis. Antimicrobial activity was assessed using agar diffusion and biofilm accumulation tests. Key factors affecting results were assessed using analysis of covariance. Results Biodentine after immediate mixing and Ionoseal aged for 6 weeks resulted in an inhibition zone, while significantly higher McFarland readings were observed in the presence of barium when using materials Ionoseal, Dyract and SDR at 24-hour aging. Through analysis of covariance it was shown that material properties affected methodology results. Conclusions Properties of materials affect results of antimicrobial testing, but this may not directly reflect the antimicrobial potential of the material in question. Careful choice of methodology and interpretation of results is important.

Reproducibility of the model cavity method for In vitro toxicity testing of dental restorative materials

1986 ◽  
Vol 24 (6-7) ◽  
pp. 592
Author(s):  
S.D. Meryon ◽  
R.M. Browne ◽  
P.F. Uphill ◽  
A.D. Cordery ◽  
R.F. Horsley
Keyword(s):  
Toxicity Testing ◽  
In Vitro Toxicity ◽  
Cavity Method ◽  
Dental Restorative Materials ◽  
Restorative Materials ◽  
Dental Restorative

scholarly journals Mechanical properties of dental restorative materials: relative contribution of laboratory tests

2003 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 162-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda Wang ◽  
Paulo Henrique Perlatti D'Alpino ◽  
Lawrence Gonzaga Lopes ◽  
José Carlos Pereira
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Properties ◽  
Laboratory Tests ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Dental Materials ◽  
Correct Selection ◽  
Relative Contribution ◽  
Dental Restorative Materials ◽  
Restorative Materials ◽  
Dental Restorative ◽  
Selection Of

A wide variety of dental products that are launched on the market becomes the correct selection of these materials a difficult task. Although the mechanical properties do not necessarily represent their actual clinical performance, they are used to guide the effects of changes in their composition or processing on these properties. Also, these tests might help somehow the clinician to choose once comparisons between former formulations and new ones, as well as, with the leading brand, are highlighted by manufactures. This paper presents a review of the most important laboratory tests. In this manner, the knowledge of these tests will provide a critical opinion related to the properties of different dental materials.

Tooth colored dental restorative materials: Porosities and surface topography in relation to bacterial adhesion

1982 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 113-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kjeld Kr. Skjørland ◽  
Arne Hensten-Pettersen ◽  
Dag ørsta-Vik ◽  
Karl-Johan Söderholm
Keyword(s):  
Surface Topography ◽  
Bacterial Adhesion ◽  
Dental Restorative Materials ◽  
Restorative Materials ◽  
Dental Restorative
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document