Flight initiation distance and escape behavior in the black redstart ( Phoenicurus ochruros )

Ethology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 125 (7) ◽  
pp. 430-438 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadine Kalb ◽  
Fabian Anger ◽  
Christoph Randler
Keyword(s):  
Escape Behavior ◽  
Flight Initiation Distance ◽  
Black Redstart ◽  
Phoenicurus Ochruros ◽  
Flight Initiation

Escape behavior by prey blocked from entering the nearest refuge

1999 ◽  
Vol 77 (4) ◽  
pp. 671-674 ◽  
Author(s):  
William E Cooper, Jr.
Keyword(s):  
Escape Behavior ◽  
Free Access ◽  
Flight Initiation Distance ◽  
Approach Distance ◽  
Increase Risk ◽  
Time Required ◽  
Optimal Approach ◽  
Flight Initiation

Current models of optimal antipredation behavior do not apply to prey blocked by a predator from access to the primary refuge because the predator is closer than the optimal approach distance and flight toward the refuge would increase risk. If other alternative refuges are available, the prey should flee toward the best alternative one. I studied the effect of an approaching human simulated predator interposed between prey and refuge on the use of alternative refuges and on flight-initiation distance in the keeled earless lizard, Holbrookia propinqua. When the predator approached on a line between a lizard and its closest refuge, the lizard invariably fled to or toward an alternative refuge. Lizards were significantly more likely to use alternative refuges than lizards approached on a line connecting the closest refuge, prey, and predator, but with the lizard between the predator and the refuge. Flight-initiation distance was significantly greater for lizards having free access to the closest refuge than for those blocked from it, perhaps because of the time required to assess the new risk posed by blockage of the closest refuge, to select the best alternative refuge, or to wait for the predator to commit to a closing pattern before choosing the best flight option.

Risk factors and escape strategy in the grasshopper Dissosteira carolina

Behaviour ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 143 (10) ◽  
pp. 1201-1218 ◽  
Author(s):  
William E. Cooper
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Field Experiments ◽  
Escape Behavior ◽  
Sudden Change ◽  
Flight Initiation Distance ◽  
Initial Direction ◽  
Escape Strategy ◽  
Approach Speed ◽  
Lateral Escape ◽  
Flight Initiation

AbstractTo determine aspects of escape strategy by the Carolina grasshopper, Dissosteira carolina, and applicability of models of escape behavior applied primarily to vertebrates, I conducted three field experiments by simulating an approaching predator. Escape theory predicts that flight initiation distance (distance from predator when escape begins) and distance fled increase as predation risk increases. Some aspects of escape are not predicted, and theory does not identify escape strategies including several components. I examined effects of risk factors (predator approach speed, directness of approach, and repeated approach) on flight initiation distance, distance fled, and the initial direction of escape. Flight initiation distance and distance fled were predicted to increase with approach speed. Because predators approaching directly may bypass prey without detecting it, probability of fleeing and flight initiation distance were predicted to increase with directness of approach. Because a persistent predator poses greater threat, flight initiation distance and distance fled were predicted to be greater for the second of two successive approaches. All findings were consistent with predictions of the Ydenberg & Dill (1986) model, suggesting that risk assessment and escape decisions by visually oriented insects may be similar to those of vertebrates. Although escape directly away from the predator might be expected to minimize risk, most grasshoppers escaped by flying at nearly right angles to the approach path. Lateral escape may be part of an escape strategy in which dark wing colour during flight rapidly disappears upon landing. With sudden change in colour and movement, the grasshopper becomes cryptic and difficult to relocate. Lateral escape may increase difficulty of maintaining visual contact with the grasshopper until it lands. It also avoids need for further escape from a predator that continues in its initial direction.

scholarly journals European birds adjust their flight initiation distance to road speed limits

2013 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 20130417 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre Legagneux ◽  
Simon Ducatez
Keyword(s):  
Habitat Structure ◽  
Territory Size ◽  
Speed Limit ◽  
Vehicle Speed ◽  
Flight Initiation Distance ◽  
Speed Limits ◽  
Behavioural Responses ◽  
Road Speed ◽  
Flight Initiation ◽  
Local Speed

Behavioural responses can help species persist in habitats modified by humans. Roads and traffic greatly affect animals' mortality not only through habitat structure modifications but also through direct mortality owing to collisions. Although species are known to differ in their sensitivity to the risk of collision, whether individuals can change their behaviour in response to this is still unknown. Here, we tested whether common European birds changed their flight initiation distances (FIDs) in response to vehicles according to road speed limit (a known factor affecting killing rates on roads) and vehicle speed. We found that FID increased with speed limit, although vehicle speed had no effect. This suggests that birds adjust their flight distance to speed limit, which may reduce collision risks and decrease mortality maximizing the time allocated to foraging behaviours. Mobility and territory size are likely to affect an individuals' ability to respond adaptively to local speed limits.

Predator-prey interactions, flight initiation distance and brain size

2013 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. P. Møller ◽  
J. Erritzøe
Keyword(s):  
Brain Size ◽  
Flight Initiation Distance ◽  
Predator Prey ◽  
Flight Initiation

Life history, predation and flight initiation distance in a migratory bird

2014 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 1105-1113 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. P. Møller
Keyword(s):  
Life History ◽  
Migratory Bird ◽  
Flight Initiation Distance ◽  
Flight Initiation

scholarly journals European birds adjust their flight initiation distance to road speed limits

2013 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 20130788 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre Legagneux ◽  
Simon Ducatez
Keyword(s):  
Flight Initiation Distance ◽  
Speed Limits ◽  
Road Speed ◽  
Flight Initiation

scholarly journals Increasing corvid tolerance to humans in urban ecosystems with increasing latitude

2020 ◽  
Vol 64 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadezhda Poddubnaya ◽  
Tatyana Korotkova ◽  
Polina Vanicheva
Keyword(s):  
Environmental Factors ◽  
Human Disturbance ◽  
Urban Ecosystems ◽  
Flight Initiation Distance ◽  
Protection Measures ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Alert Distance ◽  
Behaviour Changes ◽  
Hooded Crows ◽  
Flight Initiation

The rapid growth of cities causes behaviour changes in birds in response to urban environmental factors. The avian response to human disturbance has recently been studied by a non-invasive research tool as an alert distance (AD) and a flight initiation distance (FID) assessment. The tolerance of hooded crows (n = 395), jackdaws (n = 394) and rooks (n = 169) to humans was assessed by AD and FID. It was shown that the FID of all species is maximal during the summer, when the parents send clear “danger—fly away” signals to the young and the birds fly away. The AD and FID of the three species reliably correlates with the season. Rooks showed FID species-specificity in seven cities of Eastern Europe. Comparison of the attitude of birds to people in cities that have similarities in human culture showed that tolerance increases with increasing latitude in all species and is statistically significant only in the jackdaw. This should be taken into account in environmental protection measures.

Take only pictures, leave only… Cameras influence marmot vigilance but not perceptions of risk

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenta Uchida ◽  
Albert A. Burkle ◽  
Daniel T. Blumstein
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Predation Risk ◽  
Visual Stimulus ◽  
Zoom Lens ◽  
Flight Initiation Distance ◽  
Vulnerable Species ◽  
Species Ranges ◽  
Perceptions Of Risk ◽  
Flight Initiation ◽  
Subsequent Risk

Ecotourism promotes conservation efforts while also allowing for low impact observation of wildlife. Many ecotourists photograph wildlife and photography plays an important role in focusing the public’s attention on nature. Although photography is commonly believed to be a low impact activity, how the visual stimulus of a camera influences wildlife remains unknown. Since animals are known to fear eyes pointed towards them, we predicted that a camera with a large zoom lens would increase animal’s vigilance levels. Using yellow-bellied marmots (Marmota flaviventer) as a mammalian model, and adopting a behavioural approach to identify how marmots responded to cameras, we experimentally quantified vigilance and flight initiation distance towards humans when marmots were approached with and without a camera. While a camera was pointed at an individual, marmots allocated less time to searching predators and increased time to looking at the observer than they did without a camera. However, whether a camera was pointed at a marmot or not had no effect on the distance the marmot flushed. Our results indicated that cameras distracted marmots but did not influence subsequent risk assessment (i.e., flight initiation distance); marmots may be curious about cameras but were not threatened by them. Capturing animals’ attentions reduces searching for predators and may increase the vulnerability to predation. Therefore, regulating photography in locations where predation risk is high or vulnerable species ranges’ overlap with humans may be required to reduce photography’s impact on wildlife.

Crypsis influences escape decisions in the Round-tailed Horned Lizard (Phrynosoma modestum)

2010 ◽  
Vol 88 (10) ◽  
pp. 1003-1010 ◽  
Author(s):  
William E. Cooper, ◽  
Wade C. Sherbrooke
Keyword(s):  
Body Temperature ◽  
Predation Risk ◽  
Upright Posture ◽  
Flight Initiation Distance ◽  
Lower Body ◽  
Running Speed ◽  
Predator Prey ◽  
Sandy Area ◽  
Lower Body Temperature ◽  
Flight Initiation

Flight initiation distance (predator–prey distance when escape begins) increases as predation risk increases. Prey should have longer flight initiation distance when their background, movement, or current posture reduces crypsis. Flight initiation distance of ectotherms may increase at lower body temperature to compensate for slower running speed. However, for cryptic prey, fleeing might increase the probability of being detected. The Round-tailed Horned Lizard ( Phrynosoma modestum Girard, 1852) is eucryptic and resembles small stones. We predicted that flight initiation distance by P. modestum is shorter among stones than on uniform sand. Because movement and upright posture disrupt crypsis, we predicted that flight initiation distance is greater after movement and when standing than when still and lying on the ground. As predicted, flight initiation distances were shorter on a rocky than sandy area, when lying flat than standing, and while immobile than after moving. We measured running speed and flight initiation distance to determine relationships among body temperature, speed, and escape decisions. Running speed and flight initiation distance were reduced at lower body temperature, suggesting that crypsis reinforced by immobility is more advantageous than longer flight initiation distance for cool, slow lizards. The lizards adjusted escape decisions to current effectiveness of crypsis and escape ability.

Towards an integrated view of escape decisions in birds: relation between flight initiation distance and distance fled

2018 ◽  
Vol 136 ◽  
pp. 75-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kunter Tätte ◽  
Anders Pape Møller ◽  
Raivo Mänd
Keyword(s):  
Flight Initiation Distance ◽  
Flight Initiation
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document