scholarly journals Microbial carbon limitation: The need for integrating microorganisms into our understanding of ecosystem carbon cycling

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 1953-1961 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer L. Soong ◽  
Lucia Fuchslueger ◽  
Sara Marañon‐Jimenez ◽  
Margaret S. Torn ◽  
Ivan A. Janssens ◽  
...  
Forests ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (10) ◽  
pp. 1427
Author(s):  
Chunju Cai ◽  
Zhihan Yang ◽  
Liang Liu ◽  
Yunsen Lai ◽  
Junjie Lei ◽  
...  

Nitrogen (N) deposition has been well documented to cause substantial impacts on ecosystem carbon cycling. However, the majority studies of stimulating N deposition by direct N addition to forest floor have neglected some key ecological processes in forest canopy (e.g., N retention and absorption) and might not fully represent realistic atmospheric N deposition and its effects on ecosystem carbon cycling. In this study, we stimulated both canopy and understory N deposition (50 and 100 kg N ha−1 year−1) with a local atmospheric NHx:NOy ratio of 2.08:1, aiming to assess whether canopy and understory N deposition had similar effects on soil respiration (RS) and net ecosystem production (NEP) in Moso bamboo forests. Results showed that RS, soil autotrophic (RA), and heterotrophic respiration (RH) were 2971 ± 597, 1472 ± 579, and 1499 ± 56 g CO2 m−2 year−1 for sites without N deposition (CN0), respectively. Canopy and understory N deposition did not significantly affect RS, RA, and RH, and the effects of canopy and understory N deposition on these soil fluxes were similar. NEP was 1940 ± 826 g CO2 m−2 year−1 for CN0, which was a carbon sink, indicating that Moso bamboo forest the potential to play an important role alleviating global climate change. Meanwhile, the effects of canopy and understory N deposition on NEP were similar. These findings did not support the previous predictions postulating that understory N deposition would overestimate the effects of N deposition on carbon cycling. However, due to the limitation of short duration of N deposition, an increase in the duration of N deposition manipulation is urgent and essential to enhance our understanding of the role of canopy processes in ecosystem carbon fluxes in the future.


Plants ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas E. Marler ◽  
Murukesan V. Krishnapillai

Stem respiration is influenced by the vertical location of tree stems, but the influence of vertical location on stem respiration in a representative cycad species has not been determined. We quantified the influence of vertical strata on stem carbon dioxide efflux (Es) for six arborescent Cycas L. species to characterize this component of stem respiration and ecosystem carbon cycling. The influence of strata on Es was remarkably consistent among the species, with a stable baseline flux characterizing the full mid-strata of the pachycaulous stems and an increase in Es at the lowest and highest strata. The mid-strata flux ranged from 1.8 μmol·m−2·s−1 for Cycas micronesica K.D. Hill to 3.5 μmol·m−2·s−1 for Cycas revoluta Thunb. For all species, Es increased about 30% at the lowest stratum and about 80% at the highest stratum. A significant quadratic model adequately described the Es patterns for all six species. The increase of Es at the lowest stratum was consistent with the influence of root-respired carbon dioxide entering the stem via sap flow, then contributing to Es via radial conductance to the stem surface. The substantial increase in Es at the highest stratum is likely a result of the growth and maintenance respiration of the massive cycad primary thickening meristem that constructs the unique pachycaulous cycad stem.


Ecosphere ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (10) ◽  
pp. e01501 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher C. Wilmers ◽  
Oswald J. Schmitz

2012 ◽  
pp. 395-428 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felix Heitkamp ◽  
Anna Jacobs ◽  
Hermann F. Jungkunst ◽  
Stefanie Heinze ◽  
Matthias Wendland ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 224 (1) ◽  
pp. 132-145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franciska T. Vries ◽  
Alex Williams ◽  
Fiona Stringer ◽  
Robert Willcocks ◽  
Rosie McEwing ◽  
...  

Ecohydrology ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 284-293 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. A. Chimner ◽  
J. M. Welker ◽  
J. Morgan ◽  
D. LeCain ◽  
J. Reeder

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce Hungate ◽  
Jennifer Pett-Ridge ◽  
Steven Blazewicz ◽  
Steven Blazewicz ◽  
Egbert Schwartz ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 924-935 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Ross Hunter ◽  
Neil Ogle ◽  
Nessa O’Connor

Author(s):  
Tatiana A. Vishnivetskaya ◽  
Susanne Liebner ◽  
Roland Wilhelm ◽  
Dirk Wagner

2001 ◽  
Vol 106 (D10) ◽  
pp. 10423-10446 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Potter ◽  
Steven Klooster ◽  
Claudio Reis de Carvalho ◽  
Vanessa Brooks Genovese ◽  
Alicia Torregrosa ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document