scholarly journals Spatial network analysis as a tool for measuring change in accessibility over time: Limits of transport investment as a driver for UK regional development

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Md. Anwar Hossain ◽  
Crispin H. V. Cooper
Urban Science ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 99 ◽  
Author(s):  
György Jóna

In this paper, the spatial dimensions of a transboundary, coopetitive (coopetition: cooperation of rivals) network, established by restaurant owners, are scrutinized empirically by applying advanced toolkits of spatial network analysis (SpNA). The paper emphasizes that the coopetitive network has geographical extensions, and on the other hand, interactions between vertices generate network space. The new type of economic network could thus be analyzed by SpNA to understand the spatial characteristics of a rivals’ network at transboundary level. The paper may be referred to as cutting-edge research, because on one hand, it dissects a new type of economic network (coopetitive networks) and on the other hand, a new method is utilized (SpNA) to study the geographical parameters of inter-firm relationships. This approach emerges as a novel method. As a result, the paper provides significant, fruitful and new findings in both network science and urban economics as well. By employing metrics of SpNA, the main spatial traits of the coopetitive network can be mapped, such as the circumference, spatial structure, diameter, spatial density, spatial small world phenomenon, and global connectivity of the network. The results show that the coopetitive network possesses hub-and spoke spatial framework, in which the hub is localized far from the cluster of players. Moreover, the coopetitive interaction does not require face-to-face nexus, because the focal firm communicates with them via IT devices. The coopetitive activities contribute significantly to the urban economic growth. The main agent (the hub) ought to be supported by the regional development policy at the local and inter-urban geographical scale as well.


SoftwareX ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 100525
Author(s):  
Crispin H.V. Cooper ◽  
Alain J.F. Chiaradia

2020 ◽  
Vol 83 (11) ◽  
pp. 1877-1888
Author(s):  
XIAOLONG LI ◽  
AMANDA C. SAPP ◽  
NITYA SINGH ◽  
LAURA MATTHIAS ◽  
CHAD BAILEY ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT The Florida Complaint and Outbreak Reporting System (FL-CORS) database is used by the Florida Department of Health's Food and Waterborne Disease Program as one of the tools to detect foodborne disease outbreaks (FBOs). We present a descriptive and spatial network analysis of FL-CORS data collected during 2015 to 2018. We also quantified FBOs that were investigated and confirmed because of a filed complaint and the etiological agents involved in these outbreaks. An increasing number of unique complaints filed in FL-CORS was observed during 2015 to 2018, with a sharp increase during 2017 to 2018 and a different seasonal pattern in 2018. The preferred mechanism of reporting varied by age group, with younger people more frequently filing complaints online and older people preferring reporting in person or by phone. Spatial network analysis revealed that 87% of complaints had the same county of residence and county of presumed exposure. Frequency of complaints was negatively associated with linear distance between place of residence and place of exposure at the zip code level. Counties located in North and Central Florida, as well as some coastal areas in South Florida, had higher incidence rates of complaints. Those counties tend to have a large population density, and some are popular vacation destinations. On average, 96 FBOs were reported in Florida annually, of which 60% were confirmed with successful identification of the causative agent. The 56% of the confirmed FBOs were triggered by a complaint. Throughout the years, 2.4 to 2.8 FBOs and 1.4 confirmed FBOs were identified per 100 complaints. Ciguatera toxin was the cause of 40% of all FBOs in Florida, and only 28% of outbreaks were detected through complaints. In contrast, complaints were the main source of identifying outbreaks of norovirus, nontyphoidal Salmonella enterica, and scombroid food poisoning, as well as rare outbreaks of Clostridium perfringens, Cryptosporidium spp., Shigella spp., and Vibrio vulnificus. HIGHLIGHTS


Author(s):  
Clio Andris ◽  
David O’Sullivan

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document