scholarly journals EFFECTS OF CHANGING GONADOTROPHIN-RELEASING HORMONE PULSE FREQUENCY ON GONADOTROPHIN SECRETION IN MEN

1988 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 647-656 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. E. SAUDER ◽  
M. S. FRAGER ◽  
G. D. CASE ◽  
R. P. KELCH ◽  
J. C. MARSHALL
1991 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 137 ◽  
Author(s):  
JC Thiery ◽  
GB Martin

The anterior pituitary gland secretes pulses of luteinizing hormone (LH) in response to pulses of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) released into the hypophysial portal blood by the hypothalamus. The pulsatile nature of the secretions is very important because the frequency of the pulses is directly related to the activity of the GnRH neurons. We can therefore take advantage of this phenomenon to develop mechanistic interpretations of responses to experimental treatments designed to unravel the neural pathways that influence what is, arguably, the most important individual signal controlling the activity of the reproductive system. We might also resolve the disagreements in the literature covering the neuropharmacology of gonadotrophin secretion. In this review, we describe work towards this end in the sheep. Most (95%) of the 2500 GnRH cell bodies in the sheep brain are located in a region covering the anterior hypothalamus, the medial preoptic area, the diagonal band of Broca, and the septum. The axons of up to 50% of these cells terminate in the organum vasculosum of the lamina terminalis. The remainder terminate in the median eminence and form the final common pathway for the many factors that affect gonadotrophin secretion. Among the factors known to affect the frequency of the pulses (or the activity of the GnRH neurons) are nutrition, pheromones, photoperiod and gonadal steroids (negative and positive feedback). Factors that affect GnRH pulse amplitude are more difficult to determine because variations in pituitary responsiveness prevent the use of LH patterns as a 'bioassay'. Techniques developed recently have allowed the direct measurement of GnRH pulse amplitude and revealed inhibitory effects of oestradiol, but we do not know whether this effect is due to a reduction in the amount of GnRH released by each neurone or a reduction in the number of neurones releasing a pulse. It is unlikely that the factors that alter pulse frequency do so by directly affecting the GnRH cells. For example, it is obvious that other cells, with specific receptors for pheromonal or nutritional stimuli, formulate a signal that is transferred to the GnRH cells via interneurones. Similarly, it is likely that a hypothalamic clock intervenes between photoperiodic inputs and GnRH output. Opioidergic neurons have been proposed as a link in this system, but the complexity of their action makes it unlikely that they directly affect the GnRH neurons. The responses to steroids are simple and rapid, but steroid receptors have not been found in GnRH cells, so at least one other set of interneurones is involved.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


1986 ◽  
Vol 110 (1) ◽  
pp. 145-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. R. Marshall ◽  
F. Bint Akhtar ◽  
G. F. Weinbauer ◽  
E. Nieschlag

ABSTRACT If the suppressive effects of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists on gonadotrophin secretion are mediated through GnRH-receptor occupancy alone, it should be possible to restore serum gonadotrophin levels by displacing the antagonist with exogenous GnRH. To test this hypothesis, eight adult crab-eating macaques (Macaca fascicularis), weight 4·7–7·6 kg, were subjected to the following treatment regimens. A GnRH-stimulation test was performed before and 4, 12 and 24 h after a single s.c. injection of the GnRH antagonist (N-Ac-d-p-Cl-Phe1,2,d-Trp3,d-Arg6,d-Ala10)-GnRH (ORG 30276). The stimulation tests were performed with 0·5, 5·0 or 50 μg GnRH given as a single i.v. bolus. Blood was taken before and 15, 30 and 60 min after each bolus for analysis of bioactive LH and testosterone. The GnRH-challenging doses were given as follows: 0·5 μg GnRH was injected at 0 and 4 h, followed by 5·0 μg after 12 h and 50 μg after 24 h. One week later, 5·0 μg GnRH were given at 0 and 4 h, followed by 50 μg after 12 h and 0·5 μg after 24 h. Finally, after another week, the GnRH challenges began with 50 μg at 0 and 4 h, followed by 0·5 μg at 12 h and 5·0 μg at 24 h. This design permitted comparison of the LH and testosterone responses with respect to the dose of GnRH and the time after administration of GnRH antagonist. The areas under the response curves were measured and statistical evaluation was carried out by means of non-parametric two-way analysis of variance followed by the multiple comparisons of Wilcoxon and Wilcox. Four hours after the antagonist was injected, the LH and testosterone responses to all three doses of GnRH were suppressed. At the lowest dose of GnRH (0·5 μg) the responses remained reduced even after 24 h, whereas the higher doses of GnRH elicited an LH and testosterone response at 12 and 24 h which was not significantly different from that at 0 h. These data demonstrate that the suppression of LH secretion by a GnRH antagonist in vivo can be overcome by exogenously administered GnRH in a dose- and time-dependent manner, thus strongly supporting the contention that GnRH antagonists prevent gonadotrophin secretion by GnRH-receptor occupancy. J. Endocr. (1986) 110, 145–150


1988 ◽  
Vol 118 (3) ◽  
pp. 491-496 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Daniels ◽  
P. Newland ◽  
J. Dunn ◽  
P. Kendall-Taylor ◽  
M. C. White

ABSTRACT We have studied the effects of TRH and native gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH), and of a GnRH agonist (Buserelin; [d-Ser(But)6]GnRH(1–9) nonapeptide-ethylamide), on LH, FSH, α subunit and LH-β subunit secretion from three human gonadotrophin-secreting pituitary adenomas in dispersed cell culture. During a 24 h study, treatment with 276 nmol TRH/1 resulted in a significant (P < 0·05) stimulated release of FSH and α subunit from all three adenomas, and LH from the two adenomas secreting detectable concentrations of this glycoprotein; treatment with 85 nmol GnRH/l significantly (P < 0·05) stimulated the release of α subunit from all three, but FSH from only two and LH from only one adenoma. During a long-term 28-day study, basal FSH and α subunit concentrations were maintained, but secretion of LH, and LH-β (detectable from one tumour only), declined with time from two of the three adenomas. Addition of Buserelin to the cultures resulted in the continuous (P < 0·05) stimulation of α subunit secretion from all three adenomas, and of LH and FSH from two, whilst a transient stimulatory effect on LH and FSH secretion was seen from a third adenoma, with subsequent secretion rates declining towards control values. These data show that human gonadotrophin-secreting adenomas demonstrate variable stimulatory responses to hypothalamic TRH and GnRH, and that during chronic treatment with a GnRH agonist the anticipated desensitizing effect of the drug was not observed in two out of three adenomas studied. The mechanism for this is not clear, but such drugs are unlikely to be of therapeutic value in the management of gonadotrophin-secreting tumours. The data also suggest that GnRH and GnRH agonists have a differential effect on the in-vitro release of intact gonadotrophins and the common α subunit. J. Endocr. (1988) 118, 491–496


2003 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria J. Hötzel ◽  
Stephen W. Walkden-Brown ◽  
James S. Fisher ◽  
Graeme B. Martin

This study was designed to test whether an acute improvement in diet would increase gonadotrophin secretion and testicular growth in strongly photoperiod-responsive Suffolk rams and weakly photoperiod-responsive Merino rams in both the breeding (February–March) and the non-breeding (July–August) seasons. Mature rams (n = 5 or 6) of these breeds were fed a maintenance diet (0.9 kg chaff + 100 g lupin grain) or the same diet supplemented with 1.5 kg lupin grain for 42 days in each season. Lupin grain is a rich source of both energy and protein. Testosterone, luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) were measured in plasma from blood sampled every 20 min for 24 h on Days −1, 12 and 35 relative to the change in feeding. In rams supplemented with lupins, body mass increased in both breeds in both seasons (P < 0.001). Scrotal circumference and LH pulse frequency increased with lupin supplementation in both seasons (P < 0.003) in Merinos, but only during the breeding season (P < 0.003) in Suffolks. Plasma FSH concentrations were affected by diet only during the breeding season, being elevated on Day 12 in lupin-supplemented rams of both breeds (P < 0.05). It was concluded that Merino rams exhibit reproductive responses to improved nutrition irrespective of time of the year, whereas Suffolk rams respond to nutrition only when the hypothalamic reproductive centres are not inhibited by photoperiod. Thus, Suffolks do respond to nutrition, just as Merinos do, but only when photoperiod allows. This difference between breeds appears to be a result of differences in the neuroendocrine pathways that control pulsatile gonadotrophin-releasing hormone secretion.


1994 ◽  
Vol 74 (4) ◽  
pp. 649-656 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. C. O. Evans ◽  
N. C. Rawlings

We studied the effects of reducing gonadotrophin secretion on ovarian follicular development in young prepubertal heifer calves. Calves received a GnRH agonist (n = 5, 15 mg of Leuprolide acetate, i.m.) or carrier (n = 5) at 8 and 12 w of age. Starting at 8 and 34 w of age, ovarian follicles were monitored daily for 17 d, and at 10, 15, 25 and 35 w of age, blood samples were collected every 15 min for 12 h for measurement of serum concentration of LH and FSH. GnRH agonist treatment did not affect the age and body weight at puberty (P > 0.05). Agonist treatment suppressed follicle numbers and in two heifers follicle emergence (growth above 4–5 mm) was blocked immediately. In three agonist-treated heifers, follicle emergence was blocked after one extended wave of follicular growth. At 34 w of age the pattern of ovarian follicular growth did not differ between groups but oestradiol secretion was lower in agonist-treated heifers. During agonist treatment basal and mean concentrations of FSH, and LH and FSH pulse amplitude were decreased but basal LH concentrations increased (P < 0.05). At 25 and 35 w of age some rebound in gonadotrophin secretion was seen.We concluded that disrupting gonadotrophin secretion in young prepubertal heifer calves by GnRH agonist treatment, suppressed ovarian follicular growth but that a rebound in gonadotrophin secretion prevented long term-effects on sexual development. Key words: Follicle stimulating hormone, gonadotrophin-releasing hormone, heifer calves, luteinising hormone ovarian follicles


1988 ◽  
Vol 117 (3) ◽  
pp. 355-360 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. J. Clarke

ABSTRACT Anoestrous ewes were studied to determine the pattern of secretion of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) in the resting state and following a single i.m. injection of 50 μg oestradiol benzoate. In three out of four untreated ewes, two or three GnRH pulses were observed over a 6-h sampling period. In the fourth sheep the GnRH pulse frequency was higher (six pulses/6 h), but GnRH pulse amplitudes were lower. Following oestrogen treatment, GnRH pulses continued until the occurrence of an LH surge 12 h later. In five out of six sheep sampled during the oestrogen-induced LH surge a marked rise in GnRH secretion was seen. In the sixth ewe a large pulse of GnRH was seen at the start of the LH surge followed by increased GnRH secretion. It is concluded that GnRH pulse frequency is lower, generally, during anoestrus than during the mating season, and that oestrogen treatment of anoestrous ewes causes a surge in GnRH secretion unlike that seen in similarly treated ovariectomized ewes or the natural cyclic preovulatory changes in GnRH secretion. J. Endocr. (1988) 117, 355–360


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document