Systemic kappa light chain deposition and amyloidosis in multiple myeloma: novel morphological observations

1986 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 1065-1076 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.J. KIRKPATRICK ◽  
A. CURRY ◽  
J. GALLE ◽  
I. MELZNER
2019 ◽  
Vol 188 (2) ◽  
pp. 201-201
Author(s):  
Robert C. Clayden ◽  
Denis Macdonald ◽  
Anastasia Oikonomou ◽  
Matthew C. Cheung

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benoit Brilland ◽  
Johnny Sayegh ◽  
Anne Croue ◽  
Frank Bridoux ◽  
Jean-François Subra ◽  
...  

Light chain deposition disease (LCDD) is a rare multisystemic disorder associated with plasma cell proliferation. It mainly affects the kidney, but liver and heart involvement may occur, sometimes mimicking the picture of systemic amyloidosis. Liver disease in LCDD is usually asymptomatic and exceptionally manifests with severe cholestatic hepatitis. We report the case of a 66-year-old female with κ-LCDD and cast nephropathy in the setting of symptomatic multiple myeloma who, after a first cycle of bortezomib-dexamethasone chemotherapy, developed severe and rapidly worsening intrahepatic cholestasis secondary to liver κ-light chain deposition. Intrahepatic cholestasis was attributed to LCDD on the basis of the liver histology and exclusion of possible diagnoses. Chemotherapy was maintained and resulted in progressive resolution of cholestasis. We report here an uncommon presentation of LCDD, with prominent liver involvement that fully recovered with bortezomib-based chemotherapy, and briefly review the relevant literature. Abbreviations: AKI: Acute kidney injury; ALP: alkaline phosphatase; ALT: alanine aminotransferase; AST: aspartate aminotransferase; CMV: Cytomegalovirus; EBV: Epstein–Barr virus; GGT: gamma-glutamyl transferase; HSV: Herpes simplex virus; LC: light chain; LCDD: Light chain deposition disease; MIDD: Monoclonal immunoglobulin deposition disease; MM: Multiple myeloma.


2017 ◽  
Vol 92 (8) ◽  
pp. 739-745 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meera Mohan ◽  
Amy Buros ◽  
Pankaj Mathur ◽  
Neriman Gokden ◽  
Manisha Singh ◽  
...  

1983 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Linder ◽  
Byron P. Croker ◽  
Robin T. Vollmer ◽  
John Shelburne

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5571-5571
Author(s):  
Hiroki Kobayashi ◽  
Yoshiaki Abe ◽  
Daisuke Miura ◽  
Kentaro Narita ◽  
Akihiro Kitadate ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Renal impairment (RI) is one of the most common complications of multiple myeloma (MM), and is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Monoclonal free light chain (FLC) is associated with most RI in patients with MM, and previous reports showed that early reduction of FLC is associated with renal recovery. Novel agents including bortezomib and immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) contribute to early reduction of FLC, leading to renal recovery. However, some patients developed irreversible RI despite the use of novel agents, and the factors that predict renal recovery other than early reduction of FLC remain unclear. This study retrospectively analyzed the clinical variables that affect renal recovery in patients with RI receiving novel agents. Patients and Methods The study population consisted of 235 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) between January 2008 and April 2018 at Kameda Medical Center, Japan. All patients were treated with bortezomib or IMiD-based combined chemotherapy in the frontline setting. Nine patients who received less than 2 courses of chemotherapy were excluded because it was difficult to assess renal recovery. RI was defined as an estimated pretreatment glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of <50 ml/min/1.73 m2. We used the simplified Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula to calculate eGFR. Maximum renal response was evaluated according to International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) renal response criteria. Major renal response was defined as achieving PRrenal and CRrenal. Erythropoietin (EPO) was measured, if a patient had anemia (male: hemoglobin [Hb] <12.0 g/dl, female Hb <11.0 g/dl). Statistical analyses were performed with EZR, which is a graphical user interface for R ver. 3.2.2. Ethical considerations This study was approved by the institutional review board of Kameda Medical Center and conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Results The median patient age was 72.2 years and the median observation period was 40.8 months. Moderate-to-severe RI (eGFR <50 mL/min/1.73 m2) was identified in 104 patients (46.5%). The median eGFR was 27.9 ml/min/1.73 m2. The percentage of patients with light-chain only isotype was 28.8%, and 57.7% of the patients had kappa light chain. According to IMWG renal response criteria, 54.8% of patients achieved major renal response, including PRrenal 4.8% and CRrenal 49.0%. Baseline involved FLC, reduction of FLC, light chain-only isotype, and kappa light chain type were not statistically significant between patients with or without major renal response. There were significant differences in age, calcium, EPO, and percentage of urinary albumin excretion between responders and non-responders (Table). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the best cutoff values were 24.6 mIU/ml for EPO and 24.7% for the percentage of urinary albumin (Figure). The factors associated with major renal response included age <75 years, calcium, percentage of urinary albumin <25%, and EPO ≥25 mIU/ml. The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that age <75 years [Odds ratio (OR)=9.86; p=0.005], calcium (OR=8.94; p=0.010), percentage of urinary albumin <25% (OR=15.5; p=0.002), and EPO ≥25 mIU/ml (OR=18.4; p<0.001) were independent predictive factors for renal recovery. When patients were divided based on the percentage of urinary albumin <25% and level of EPO ≥25 mIU/ml, the proportion of those who achieved major renal recovery was significantly different among 3 groups (both urinary albumin <25% and EPO ≥25 mIU/ml vs. either urinary albumin <25% or EPO ≥25 mIU/ml vs. neither urinary albumin <25% nor EPO ≥25 mIU/ml: 84.2% vs 32.3% vs. 6.0%, p<0.001). Conclusion Our results indicate that early reduction of FLC could have less predictive value for renal recovery compared to that in previous reports because early FLC reduction could be obtained in almost all patients irrespective of improvement in renal function. However, the level of serum EPO and the percentage of urinary albumin emerged as positive predictive factors for renal recovery in patients with RI receiving novel agents. The combination of these 2 variables could predict renal recovery more precisely. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


1994 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Toussirot ◽  
F. Bille ◽  
J. F. Henry ◽  
P. C. Acquaviva

2021 ◽  
pp. jclinpath-2021-207449
Author(s):  
Zi-Shan Lin ◽  
Xu Zhang ◽  
Dan-Yang Li ◽  
Xiao-Juan Yu ◽  
Ai-Bo Qin ◽  
...  

AimsA varying proportion of patients with multiple myeloma suffer from more than one type of kidney disease simultaneously, of which the most common pattern is coexistent light chain cast nephropathy and light chain deposition disease (LCCN+LCDD). We investigated clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes of LCCN+LCDD in comparison with pure LCCN and pure LCDD.MethodsWe retrospectively analysed 45 newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients with pure LCCN (n=26), LCCN +LCDD (n=9) and pure LCDD (n=10) between 2000 and 2019 at Peking University First Hospital.ResultsPathologically, patients with LCCN+LCDD were more likely to have λ light chain isotype and presented atypical features of LCDD including less nodular glomerulosclerosis and less deposit distribution than patients with pure LCDD. In clinical characteristics, patients with LCCN +LCDD and patients with pure LCCN shared similar features. The death-censored renal survival in patients with LCCN +LCDD was similar to patients with pure LCCN but worse than patients with pure LCDD, but the overall survival was much better than patients with LCCN alone and similar to patients with pure LCDD. For patients with pure LCCN, the independent predictor of death-censored renal survival was lactate dehydrogenase, and the independent predictors of overall survival were the mean number of casts and serum albumin.ConclusionsPatients with LCCN+LCDD had similar renal outcome compared with patients with pure LCCN but the overall survival is much better. Thus, for patients with LCCN, especially those with λ restriction, pathologists should carefully evaluate the kidney specimens to exclude the possibility of combined LCDD.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document