scholarly journals Coactivation of Vibrio vulnificus putAP operon by cAMP receptor protein and PutR through cooperative binding to overlapping sites

2006 ◽  
Vol 60 (2) ◽  
pp. 513-524 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeong Hyun Lee ◽  
Sang Ho Choi
2018 ◽  
Vol 200 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeong-A Kim ◽  
Mi-Ae Lee ◽  
You-Chul Jung ◽  
Bo-Ram Jang ◽  
Kyu-Ho Lee

ABSTRACTSepticemia-causingVibrio vulnificusproduces at least three exoproteases, VvpE, VvpS, and VvpM, all of which participate in interactions with human cells. Expression of VvpE and VvpS is induced in the stationary phase by multiple transcription factors, including sigma factor S, SmcR, and the cAMP-cAMP receptor protein (cAMP-CRP) complex. Distinct roles of VvpM, such as induction of apoptosis, lead us to hypothesize VvpM expression is different from that of the other exoproteases. Its transcription, which was found to be independent of sigma S, is induced at the early exponential phase and then becomes negligible upon entry into the stationary phase. SmcR and CRP were studied regarding the control ofvvpMexpression. Transcription ofvvpMwas repressed by SmcR and cAMP-CRP complex individually, which specifically bound to the regions −2 to +20 and +6 to +27, respectively, relative to thevvpMtranscription initiation site. Derepression ofvvpMgene expression was 10- to 40-fold greater in ansmcR crpdouble mutant than in single-gene mutants. Therefore, these results show that the expression ofV. vulnificusexoproteases is differentially regulated, and in this way, distinct proteases can engage in specific interactions with a host.IMPORTANCEAn opportunistic human pathogen,Vibrio vulnificusproduces multiple extracellular proteases that are involved in diverse interactions with a host. The total exoproteolytic activity is detected mainly in the supernatants of the high-cell-density cultures. However, some proteolytic activity derived from a metalloprotease, VvpM, was present in the supernatants of the low-cell-density cultures sampled at the early growth period. In this study, we present the regulatory mechanism for VvpM expression via repression by at least two transcription factors. This type of transcriptional regulation is the exact opposite of those for expression of the otherV. vulnificusexoproteases. Differential regulation of each exoprotease's production then facilitates the pathogen's participation in the distinct interactions with a host.


1999 ◽  
Vol 181 (24) ◽  
pp. 7639-7642 ◽  
Author(s):  
Young Bae Bang ◽  
Shee Eun Lee ◽  
Joon Haeng Rhee ◽  
Sang Ho Choi

ABSTRACT Glucose repressed hemolysin production in Vibrio vulnificus. Promoter activity of the hemolysin gene,vvh, assessed with a vvh-luxCDABEtranscriptional fusion, required cyclic AMP (cAMP) and cAMP receptor protein (CRP) in Escherichia coli. Hemolysin production inV. vulnificus increased after the addition of cAMP and was undetectable in a putative crp mutant, suggesting thatvvh is also regulated by cAMP-CRP in V. vulnificus.


1983 ◽  
Vol 258 (11) ◽  
pp. 6979-6983 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Rangel-Aldao ◽  
G Tovar ◽  
M Ledezma de Ruiz

1999 ◽  
Vol 337 (3) ◽  
pp. 415-423 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma C. LAW ◽  
Nigel J. SAVERY ◽  
Stephen J. W. BUSBY

The Escherichia coli cAMP receptor protein (CRP) is a factor that activates transcription at over 100 target promoters. At Class I CRP-dependent promoters, CRP binds immediately upstream of RNA polymerase and activates transcription by making direct contacts with the C-terminal domain of the RNA polymerase α subunit (αCTD). Since αCTD is also known to interact with DNA sequence elements (known as UP elements), we have constructed a series of semi-synthetic Class I CRP-dependent promoters, carrying both a consensus DNA-binding site for CRP and a UP element at different positions. We previously showed that, at these promoters, the CRP–αCTD interaction and the CRP–UP element interaction contribute independently and additively to transcription initiation. In this study, we show that the two halves of the UP element can function independently, and that, in the presence of the UP element, the best location for the DNA site for CRP is position -69.5. This suggests that, at Class I CRP-dependent promoters where the DNA site for CRP is located at position -61.5, the two αCTDs of RNA polymerase are not optimally positioned. Two experiments to test this hypothesis are presented.


2000 ◽  
Vol 275 (9) ◽  
pp. 6241-6245 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hidehisa Yoshimura ◽  
Toru Hisabori ◽  
Shuichi Yanagisawa ◽  
Masayuki Ohmori

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document