Development of renal failure during the initial 24 h of intensive care unit stay correlates with hospital mortality in trauma patients

2006 ◽  
Vol 50 (7) ◽  
pp. 828-832 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Ala-Kokko ◽  
P. Ohtonen ◽  
J. Laurila ◽  
M. Martikainen ◽  
P. Kaukoranta
2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 115-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pantelis Stergiannis ◽  
Theodoros Katsoulas ◽  
George Fildissis ◽  
George Intas ◽  
Peter Galanis ◽  
...  

1991 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 339-345 ◽  
Author(s):  
WENDELL A. GOINS ◽  
H. NEAL REYNOLDS ◽  
DAVID NYANJOM ◽  
C. MICHAEL DUNHAM

2015 ◽  
Vol 81 (11) ◽  
pp. 1134-1137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Johnston ◽  
Karen Safcsak ◽  
Michael L. Cheatham ◽  
Chadwick P. Smith

Obesity incidence in the trauma population is increasing. Abdominal compartment syndrome has poor outcomes when left untreated. Surgeons may treat obese patients differently because of concern for increased morbidity and mortality. We studied the effects of body mass index (BMI) on resource utilization and outcome. An Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective review of trauma patients requiring temporary abdominal closure (TAC) was performed. Patients were stratified as follows: Group 1-BMI = 18.5 to 24.9 kg/m2, Group 2-BMI = 25 to 29.9 kg/m2, Group 3-BMI = 30 to 39.9 kg/m2, Group 4-BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2. Demographic data, illness severity as defined by Injury Severity Score, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation Score Version II and Simplified Acute Physiology Score Version II scores, resource utilization, fascial closure rate, and survival were collected. About 380 patients required TAC. Median age of Group 1 was significantly lower than Groups 2 and 3 ( P = 0.001). Severity of illness did not differ. Group 4 had a longer intensive care unit stay compared with Groups 1 and 2 ( P = 0.005). Group 4 required mechanical ventilation longer than Group 1 ( P = 0.027). Hospital stay, fascial closure, and survival were equivalent. Obese trauma patients with TAC have a longer intensive care unit stay and more ventilator days, but there is no difference in survival or type of closure. TAC can be used safely in trauma patients with a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2.


2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 201-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Galinos Barmparas ◽  
Ara Ko ◽  
Megan Y. Harada ◽  
Andrea A. Zaw ◽  
Jason S. Murry ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rispah Chomba ◽  
Maeyane Steve Moeng ◽  
Warren Lowman

Abstract Background: Biomarkers like procalcitonin (PCT) are an important antimicrobial stewardship tool for critically ill patients. The purpose of our study was to compare a procalcitonin guided antibiotic algorithm to standard antibiotic treatment in surgical trauma patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU).Methods: A prospective, two period cross-over study was conducted in a surgical trauma intensive care unit in South Africa. In the first period, 40 patients were recruited into the control group and antibiotics were discontinued as per standard of care. In the second period, 40 patients were recruited into the procalcitonin group and antibiotics were discontinued if the PCT decreased by ≥ 80% from the peak PCT level, or to an absolute value of less than 0.5 µg/L. Antibiotic duration of treatment was the primary outcome. Patients were followed up for 28 days from the first sepsis event.Results: For the first sepsis event the PCT group had a mean antibiotic duration of 9.3 days while the control group had a mean duration of 10.9 days (p=0.10). Patients in the intervention group had more antibiotic free days alive (mean 7.7±6.57 days) compared to the control group ﴾mean 3.8±5.22 days, (p=0.004﴿. The length of ICU stay and length of hospital stay for the two groups were similar. The in-hospital mortality was reduced in the intervention group (15%) compared to the control group (30%).Conclusion: There was no significant difference in duration of antibiotic treatment between the two groups. However, the PCT group had more antibiotic free days alive and lower in-hospital mortality compared to the control group.Trial registration: Pan African clinical trial registry, PACTR201909715467725, date of registration: 20.9.2019; retrospectively registered, https://pactr.samrc.ac.za/Search.aspx


2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 375-386
Author(s):  
N Yücel ◽  
T Togal ◽  
E Gedik ◽  
C Ertan ◽  
U Kayabas ◽  
...  

Objective To identify the risk factors that influence outcome for patients who are diagnosed with septic shock in the emergency department at presentation or within 24 hours after admission to intensive care unit. Methods A retrospective study of 57 adult patients with septic shock was conducted between March 1, 2006 and August 31, 2009. Results The patients were 23 males and 34 females with a median age of 67 years (20 to 92 years). Thirty-three (58%) of 57 patients died in hospital and 24 (42%) survived. Multivariate analysis identified low blood pH (OR <0.001; 95% CI <0.001-0.53) and low bicarbonate level (OR 0.81; 95% CI 0.70-0.95) at emergency department or intensive care unit admission as useful predictors of 3-day in-hospital mortality. Low blood pH (OR <0.001; 95% CI <0.001-0.05), low bicarbonate level (OR 0.75; 95% CIs 0.61-0.91), long duration of symptoms (OR 1.49; 95% CI 1.04-2.13), high MEDS score (OR 1.56; 95% CIs 1.06-2.30), and high SOFA score (OR 1.57; 95% CI 1.12-2.20) were risk factors for 14-day in-hospital mortality. Renal failure (OR 7.58; 95% CI 1.28-44.77), lower pulmonary tract infection (OR 3.58; 95% CI 1.10-11.58), high MEDS score (OR 1.42; 95% CI 1.05-1.93) and high APACHE II score (OR 1.34; 95% CI 1.13-1.60) were risk factors for 28-day in-hospital mortality. Conclusions Several factors signaling poor short-term outcome for this patient group are low blood pH, low serum bicarbonate level, longer duration of symptoms, lower respiratory tract infection and renal failure. MEDS and SOFA scores might be helpful in the ED to stratify patients with septic shock according to mortality risk.


CJEM ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (S1) ◽  
pp. S84
Author(s):  
J. Coles ◽  
M. Erdogan ◽  
S. Higgins ◽  
R. Green

Introduction: Long-term immobility has detrimental effects for critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) including ICU-acquired weakness. Early mobilization of patients admitted to ICU has been demonstrated to be a safe, feasible and effective strategy to improve patient outcomes. The optimal mobilization of trauma ICU patients has not been extensively studied. Our objective was to determine the impact of an early mobilization protocol on outcomes among trauma patients admitted to the ICU. Methods: We analyzed all adult trauma patients ( &gt; 18 years old) admitted to ICU over a 2-year period prior to and following implementation of an early mobilization protocol, allowing for a 1-year transition period. Data were collected from the Nova Scotia Trauma Registry. We compared patient characteristics and outcomes (mortality, length of stay [LOS], ventilator days) between the pre- and post-implementation groups. Associations between early mobilization and clinical outcomes were estimated using binary and linear regression models. Results: Overall, there were 526 patients included in the analysis (292 pre-implementation, 234 post-implementation). The study population ranged in age from 18 to 92 years (mean age 49.0 ± 20.4 years) and 74.3% of all patients were male. The pre- and post-implementation groups were similar in age, sex, and injury severity. In-hospital mortality was reduced in the post-implementation group (25.3% vs. 17.5%; p = 0.031). In addition, there was a reduction in ICU mortality in the post-implementation group (21.6% vs. 12.8%; p = 0.009). We did not observe any difference in overall hospital LOS, ICU LOS, or ventilator days between the two groups. Compared to the pre-implementation period, trauma patients admitted to the ICU following protocol implementation were less likely to die in-hospital (OR = 0.52, 95% CI 0.30-0.91; p = 0.021) or in the ICU (OR = 0.40, 95% CI 0.21- 0.76, p = 0.005). Results were similar following a sensitivity analysis limited to patients with blunt or penetrating injuries. There was no difference between the pre- and post-implementation groups with respect to in-hospital LOS, ICU LOS, or the number of ventilator days. Conclusion: We found that trauma patients admitted to ICU during the post-implementation period had decreased odds of in-hospital mortality and ICU mortality. Ours is the first study to demonstrate a significant reduction in trauma mortality following implementation of an ICU mobility protocol.


2005 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
pp. 456-463 ◽  
Author(s):  
Belinda J. Gabbe ◽  
Peter A. Cameron ◽  
Rory Wolfe ◽  
Pam Simpson ◽  
Karen L. Smith ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document