scholarly journals Progression of antiphospholipid antibody syndrome to catastrophic antiphospholipid antibody syndrome acutely with cessation of antithrombotic therapy

2012 ◽  
Vol 42 (5) ◽  
pp. 585-591 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. S. Katikireddi ◽  
D. A. Kandiah
2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Kunal Mahajan ◽  
Virender Katyal ◽  
Suvrat Arya ◽  
Meha Shrama

The antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS) is defined by the persistent presence of antiphospholipid antibodies in patients with recurrent venous or arterial thromboembolism or pregnancy morbidity. Antithrombotic therapy is the mainstay of treatment given the high risk of recurrent thromboembolism that characterizes this condition. Despite the prothrombotic nature of APS, thrombocytopenia is present in a proportion of patients, which can complicate management and limit the use of antithrombotic therapy. The mechanism of APS-associated thrombocytopenia is multifactorial and its relation to thrombotic risk is poorly characterized. The presence of thrombocytopenia does not appear to reduce thrombotic risk in patients with APS, who can develop thromboembolic complications necessitating antithrombotic treatment. In these cases, treatment of the thrombocytopenia may be necessary to facilitate administration of antithrombotic agents. We present such a pregnant lady with history of recurrent pregnancy losses who presented with severe thrombocytopenia and bleeding manifestations, who was subsequently diagnosed to have antiphospholipid antibody syndrome. She was initially managed with steroids and when her platelet counts improved, antithrombotic therapy was started. She delivered an uneventful and successful pregnancy outcome without any complications during follow-up.


2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_G) ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesca Romana Prandi ◽  
Marialucia Milite ◽  
Roberto Celotto ◽  
Dalgisio Lecis ◽  
Massimo Marchei ◽  
...  

Abstract Antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS) is a systemic autoimmune disorder characterized by venous and arterial thromboembolic (TE) disease, and/or pregnancy morbidity, associated with persistent elevated antiphospholipid antibodies (lupus anticoagulant, LA, anticardiolipin, aCL, and anti-beta2-glycoprotein I, anti-β2GPI). A 51 year-old man, smoker, presented to our ER with chest pain. EKG showed Q waves and STE in the anterior leads, with increased troponin levels. A diagnosis of anterior STEMI was made and he was taken into our catheterization laboratory, where a high burden thrombotic plaque determining LM and ostial LAD subocclusion was treated with PPCI and a DES implantation; in addition, multiple failed PCI attempts were performed on a distal LAD occlusion, and an integrilin bolus was administered. The patient was admitted to our CICU and a DAPT with ASA and Ticagrelor was started. TTE showed LVEF 40%, apical akinesis, septal and anterior hypokinesis, and no significant valve disease. An aPTT abnormal value (100.5 s; reference range 25–38.5 s) was detected, not corrected by aPTT mixing study. Given suspected autoimmune prothrombotic state, normal Hb and PLT values and low bleeding risk, LMWH 100 IU/kg every 12 h was started, in addition to DAPT with switch from Ticagrelor to Clopidogrel. LA and aCL and anti-β2GPI IgG were positive, with negativity of others rheumatologic tests, confirming primary APS diagnosis. Repeat TTE showed EF 50%. The patient was discharged in ‘triple therapy’ (DAPT plus LMWH), and referred to the rheumatology clinic. LA, aCL, and anti-β2GPI tests 12 weeks later were positive, confirming a triple positive APS and satisfying revised Sapporo criteria. The rheumatologist switched therapy to Clopidogrel plus Warfarin. At 3 months follow-up, the patient, former smoker, was asymptomatic and TTE confirmed EF 50%, so he was recommended to continue with his medical therapy. APS is rarely associated with AMI (∼5.5%) and in only 2.8% cases AMI represents the onset of the disease. AMI pathogenesis in APS is considered to be acute thrombosis of coronary arteries, in contrast with atherosclerotic plaque rupture in typical AMI. Key discriminators to identify APS as potential underlying cause of AMI include young age, previous unprovoked thromboses, low platelets count (they are consumed in the thrombotic process), high aPTT value (LA may interfere with assembly of the prothrombinase complex on phospholipids), coronary artery thromboses in the setting of otherwise normal otherwise appearing coronary arteries. APS antibodies have also pro-inflammatory activity on vascular endothelial cells, leading to accelerated atherosclerosis. aGAPSS score (high risk ≥10) is useful for risk stratification of recurrent thrombosis and AMI in young patients with APS. The treatment of AMI in APS is therefore a clinical challenge. Strict management of additional CV risk factors is crucial. VKA (INR >3 with Warfarin, INR2–3 with Warfarin and ASA) should be provided for life, because of the very high risk of recurrent TE. DOACs are less effective and less safe than VKAs for TE prevention in APS. The role of coronary stents, considering higher rates of stent thrombosis after PCI in APS patients triple therapy concomitant risks, requires further studies. Due to lack of large, randomized, prospective studies, there is no clear experts consensus about optimal antithrombotic therapy in secondary prevention after arterial TE. APS patients with STEMI should undergo PCI, usually associated with thrombus aspiration, and in selected cases DES implantation in culprit lesion followed by triple antithrombotic therapy with short-term DAPT and long-term VKA.


Hematology ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 2009 (1) ◽  
pp. 233-239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wendy Lim

Abstract The antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS) is defined by the persistent presence of antiphospholipid antibodies in patients with recurrent venous or arterial thromboembolism or pregnancy morbidity. Anti-thrombotic therapy is the mainstay of treatment given the high risk of recurrent thromboembolism that characterizes this condition. Despite the prothrombotic nature of APS, thrombocytopenia is present in a proportion of patients. which can complicate management and limit the use of antithrombotic therapy. The mechanism of APS-associated thrombocytopenia is multifactorial and its relation to thrombotic risk poorly characterized. However, the presence of thrombocytopenia does not appear to reduce thrombotic risk in patients with APS, who can develop thromboembolic complications necessitating antithrombotic treatment. In these cases, treatment of the thrombocytopenia may be necessary to facilitate administration of antithrombotic agents. Clinical trials have demonstrated that patients with antiphospholipid antibodies and venous thromboembolism should be treated with vitamin K antagonists (warfarin); that ischemic stroke may be treated with aspirin or warfarin; and that women with recurrent pregnancy loss should receive prophylactic-dose heparin and aspirin. However, application of these trial results to patients with APS-associated thrombocytopenia can be challenging since there are limited data on the optimal use of antithrombotic agents in this setting. Issues such as determining the platelet threshold at which antithrombotic agents can be safely used and managing patients with both bleeding and thromboembolic complications remain unresolved. Ultimately the risks and benefits of antithrombotic therapy, balanced against the severity of the thrombocytopenia and its potential bleeding risks, need to be assessed using an individualized patient approach.


1994 ◽  
Vol 71 (04) ◽  
pp. 424-427 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masahide Yamazaki ◽  
Hidesaku Asakura ◽  
Hiroshi Jokaji ◽  
Masanori Saito ◽  
Chika Uotani ◽  
...  

SummaryThe mechanisms underlying clinical abnormalities associated with the antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APAS) have not been elucidated. We measured plasma levels of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], the active form of plasminogen activator inhibitor (active PAI), thrombin-antithrombin III complex (TAT) and soluble thrombomodulin (TM), to investigate the relationship of these factors to thrombotic events in APAS. Mean plasma levels of Lp(a), TAT, active PAI and TM were all significantly higher in patients with aPL than in a control group of subjects. Plasma levels of Lp(a) and active PAI were significantly higher in patients with aPL and arterial thromboses than in patients with aPL but only venous thromboses. There was a significant correlation between plasma levels of Lp(a) and active PAI in patients with aPL. These findings suggest that patients with aPL are in hypercoagulable state. High levels of Lp(a) in plasma may impair the fibrinolytic system resulting in thromboses, especially in the arterial system.


1997 ◽  
Vol 77 (04) ◽  
pp. 624-628 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabine Eichinger ◽  
Ingrid Pabinger ◽  
Andreas Stümpfien ◽  
Mirko Hirschl ◽  
Christine Bialonczyk ◽  
...  

SummaryThromboprophylaxis with oral anticoagulants up to six months is established in patients after a first venous thromboembolic event (VTE). The risk of recurrent VTE is still considerable thereafter, and it is uncertain whether some patients might benefit from extended anticoagulation. We performed a prospective, multicenter trial (4 thrombosis centers) and evaluated in 380 patients with a first or recurrent VTE (patients with a deficiency of antithrombin, protein C, protein S or plasminogen; cancer; or an antiphospholipid antibody syndrome were excluded) the risk of recurrence after discontinuation of secondary thromboprophylaxis with oral anticoagulants. It was the aim of the study to evaluate whether patients with factor V Leiden are at an increased risk of recurrent VTE. 112 (29.5%) patients were carriers of factor V Leiden (26.9% heterozygous, 2.6% homozygous). After a median observation time of 19.3 months the overall recurrence rate of VTE was 9.9%. Recurrent deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism occurred in 26 of 268 patients without factor V Leiden (9.7%) and in 10 of 112 patients with factor V Leiden (8.9%). The probability of recurrent VTE two years after discontinuation of oral anticoagulants was 12.4% (95% Cl 7.8-17) in patients without factor V Leiden and was 10.6% (95% Cl 3.8-17.4) in carriers of the mutation. This difference was statistically not significant. Patients with factor V Leiden are not at a higher risk of recurrent VTE within two years after discontinuation of oral anticoagulants than patients without factor V Leiden. Balancing the risk of recurrent VTE and bleeding from oral. anticoagulants, patients with factor V Leiden are not likely to benefit from oral anticoagulant therapy extended beyond six months.


2001 ◽  
Vol 63 (3) ◽  
pp. 230-234
Author(s):  
Ryo TANAKA ◽  
Takenobu YAMAMOTO ◽  
Osamu YAMASAKI ◽  
Joji TADA ◽  
Jiro ARATA ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 77 (6) ◽  
pp. 517-21
Author(s):  
Célia S. Macedo ◽  
Roberta S. Martinez ◽  
Márcia C. Riyuzo ◽  
Herculano D. Bastos

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1029.2-1030
Author(s):  
A. Colpo ◽  
P. Marson ◽  
T. Tison ◽  
A. Zambon ◽  
A. La Rosa ◽  
...  

Background:Therapeutic apheresis (TA) represents a therapeutic option in pre-existing conditions or rheumatic diseases that occur during gestation. Although pregnancy is not a contraindication itself, due to the lack of evidence-based guidelines and the alleged risk of maternal and/or fetal adverse events, there is general resistance to its application during pregnancy.Objectives:In this observational study we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TA in high-risk pregnancies in patients with rheumatic diseases, followed over a decade in a tertiary Center.Methods:Between January 2005 and April 2019, 843 TA procedures were performed during 51 pregnancies in 43 patients: 745 plasma exchange sessions and 98 immunoabsorption sessions. TA was performed in 29 (57%) pregnancies of 21 (48.8%) patients with antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS), in 20 (39.2%) pregnancies of 20 (46.5%) patients with congenital heart block (CHB), in 1 (1.9%) pregnancy of 1 (2.3%) patient with systemic sclerosis (SSc) and 1 (1.9%) pregnancy of 1 (2.3%) patient affected by lupic nephritis (SLE).Results:During the period considered, apheresis sessions applied to pregnant women were 7.1% of the total (n = 13.251). The average age at the first treatment was 33 years (range 24-43). The mean management age at the first apheretic treatment was 21 weeks (range 4-32). Twelve (1.4%) apheresis sessions were complicated by adverse events, none required or prolonged hospitalization. There were 44 (86.3%) live births, 3 (5.9%) spontaneous abortions and 2 (3.9%) voluntary terminations of pregnancy, 2 (3.9%) lost to follow-up. The average gestational age at birth was 35 weeks (range 24-37) and cesarean section was performed in 41 (80.4%) cases. TA was added to conventional therapy in 24/29 (82.7%) patients with APS, to the detection of fetal cardiac activity, while in 5/26 (17.3%) it was introduced when the first signs of pregnancy complications such as mild preclampsia, HELLP and IUGR were detected. TA was started within 24 hours of atrioventricular block (AVB) detection; 10/20 (50%) mothers with CHB were diagnosed with 2nd degree AVB, 9/20 (45%) with 3rd degree AVB and one (5%) with sinus bradycardia and endocardial fibroelastosis. The patient with SSc was treated with TA twice a week from the 32nd SG until delivery, which occurred at the 36th SG, due to severe IUGR and oligohydramnios. The patient with SLE complicated by lupic nephritis was treated with TA twice a week, from the 26th SG until the birth, which took place at the 31st SG.Conclusion:Our data have shown that TA in pregnancy is well tolerated. Close collaboration between rheumatologist, obstetrician and specialist in TA is essential to ensure a successful outcome of high-risk pregnancies.Disclosure of Interests: :Anna Colpo: None declared, Piero Marson: None declared, Tiziana Tison: None declared, Alessandra Zambon: None declared, Annalisa La Rosa: None declared, Ermella Zanetti: None declared, Amelia Ruffatti: None declared, Giustina De Silvestro: None declared, Ariela Hoxha Speakers bureau: Celgene, UCB, Novartis, Sanofi, Werfen


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-38
Author(s):  
Babak Choobi Anzali ◽  
Maryam Bahreini ◽  
Behnaz Habibi ◽  
Noorieh Sharifi Sistani

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document