Deliberation and Past Injustice: Recognition and the Reasonableness of Apology in the Australian Case

2008 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 236-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine Smits
2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruth Ditlmann ◽  
Ethan Kogan ◽  
Reginald Wiliiams ◽  
Valerie Purdie-Vaughns ◽  
John Dovidio

2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 13
Author(s):  
Samantha B Meyer

Research attributes low fruit and vegetable consumption to problems of access, availability and affordability. We conducted, for the first time, a case study with three families designed and analysed using the sustainable Livelihoods Framework. The benefit of such an approach is that we moved away from identified barriers and towards identifying the capabilities and resources low-income families use to incorporate fruit and vegetables into their diets. Mitigating cost and access, we provided families with a box of fresh fruit and vegetables free of charge for up to 10 weeks and observed and recorded how/if the contents were used. Results identify the importance of social networking, organizational skills, knowledge of health benefits, and social structures. This paper demonstrates an effective methodology for understanding the capabilities of, rather than barriers to, low-income families increasing fruit and vegetable intake. Additionally, we provide a ‘how to’ and ‘lessons from the field’ for researchers interested in conducting research of this nature.


Pathology ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 310-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine Kociuba ◽  
Rosemary Munro ◽  
Denise Daley
Keyword(s):  

2013 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 299-331
Author(s):  
Benjamin Hayward

International arbitration is an important area of federal jurisdiction and federal legislative competence, and has attracted significant policy attention in Australia. This paper undertakes a study of pro-arbitration judicial policy in recent arbitration-related Australian case law which touches upon the continuing applicability of the controversial 1999 Eisenwerk decision of the Queensland Court of Appeal. Against this pro-arbitration judicial policy context, this paper reviews five Eisenwerk-related cases handed down between 2010 and 2012. It concludes that despite pro-arbitration judicial policy being embedded as a requirement of reasoning in decisions under the International Arbitration Act 1974 (Cth), there is mixed evidence of such policy in the cases surveyed. This paper concludes that the extent to which this policy is evidenced largely corresponds with the degree to which contemporary decisions have departed from Eisenwerk.


2019 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 204-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alyson Wilson ◽  
Stanley Serafin ◽  
Dilan Seckiner ◽  
Rachel Berry ◽  
Xanthé Mallett

2020 ◽  
Vol 54 (7) ◽  
pp. 643-651 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Foo ◽  
George Rivers ◽  
Louise Allen ◽  
Dragan Ilic ◽  
Stephen Maloney ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-17
Author(s):  
Patricia Easteal AM ◽  
Annie Blatchford ◽  
Kate Holland ◽  
Georgina Sutherland

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document