Death from Post-partum Haemorrhage after Caesarean Section

1921 ◽  
Vol 28 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 544-546
Author(s):  
Ewen J. Maclean
2021 ◽  
pp. 56-57
Author(s):  
Anupama Anupama

Aim – The aim of the study was to study the effect of sublingual misoprostol for prevention of PPH. Materials and Methods – This was a prospective, randomized, double blind, placebo controlled study. Inclusion criteria were women aged 20-40 years with 38-40 weeks of gestation who underwent elective caesarean section. Exclusion criteria were women have risk factors for post-partum haemorrhage, active thromboembolic disease and intrinsic risk for thrombosis. Participants were randomly assigned to misoprostol group or group A (n=50) and placebo group or group B(n=50). Group A received 400µg of sublingual misoprostol after delivery of the baby, group B received placebo tablet at the same time. Primary outcome measures were blood loss from delivery of the placenta to the end of the caesarean section to 2 hours postpartum, haemoglobin estimation was done in all patients pre operatively and 24 hours post operatively and the change in concentration was noted. Secondary outcome measures were need for additional uterotonics, use of additional surgical interventions to control post-partum haemorrhage. Result – Blood loss from both placental delivery to the end of caesarean section and from end of caesarean section to 2 hours postpartum were signicantly lower in the study group. (p<0.0001). Change ifn haemoglobin concentration in study group was also signicantly less than in the control group. (p<0.0001). Total amount of Oxytocin required was signicantly less in the study group (p=0.01). The number of women requiring other oxytocics (inj. Methyl ergometrine, inj. Carboprost) was signicantly less in study group (p=0.0078). Conclusion – Sublingual misoprostol has been found to be effective in preventing PPH.


2015 ◽  
Vol 118 (5) ◽  
pp. 338-343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Şenol Şentürk ◽  
Mehmet Kağıtçı ◽  
Gülşah Balık ◽  
Halit Arslan ◽  
Figen Kır Şahin

2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 34-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
AI Adanikin ◽  
E Orji ◽  
PO Adanikin ◽  
O Olaniyan

Aims: This comparative study aimed to compare the efficacy of rectal misoprostol to oxytocin infusion in preventing primary postpartum haemorrhage after caesarean section. Methods: Fifty pregnant women with identifiable risk factors for post-partum haemorrhage who delivered baby by caesarean section were randomized to receive 600 μg rectal misoprostol and a placebo infusion intravenously or placebo rectally and a 20 iu oxytocin infusion. Post-operative blood loss four hours after surgery was estimated by application of pads of known weight. Results: The mean immediate four hours post-operative blood loss was not significantly different between the rectal misoprostol and oxytocin infusion group (100.08 ± 24.85 ml versus 108.20 ± 29.93 ml; p =0.144) and the change between the pre-operative and post-operative hematocrit was similar. Conclusions: Post-caesarean section rectal misoprostol has comparative efficacy to oxytocin infusion in preventing post-partum haemorrhage. It is recommended for use as alternative uterotonic in settings where there is low refrigeration capacity.Nepal Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology / Vol 8 / No. 2 / Issue 16 / July-Dec, 2013 / 34-37 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/njog.v8i2.9767


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Seema Sheokand ◽  
Rohit Manoj Kumar ◽  
Divya Jain ◽  
Pooja Sikka

Abstract Pregnancy in a woman with double outlet right ventricle, ventricular septal defect, and pulmonary stenosis is presented. Her previous two pregnancies ended in fetal losses. In the current pregnancy, she had thrombocytopenia, placenta previa, and severe fetal growth restriction. She underwent an emergency caesarean section followed by post-partum haemorrhage and COVID-19 infection. Literature review has been performed.


BMC Medicine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthea C. Lindquist ◽  
Roxanne M. Hastie ◽  
Richard J. Hiscock ◽  
Natasha L. Pritchard ◽  
Susan P. Walker ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Post-term gestation beyond 41+6 completed weeks of gestation is known to be associated with a sharp increase in the risk of stillbirth and perinatal mortality. However, the risk of common adverse outcomes related to labour, such as shoulder dystocia and post-partum haemorrhage for those delivering at this advanced gestation, remains poorly characterised. The objective of this study was to examine the risk of adverse, labour-related outcomes for women progressing to 42 weeks gestation or beyond, compared with those giving birth at 39 completed weeks. Methods We performed a state-wide cohort study using routinely collected perinatal data in Australia. Comparing the two gestation cohorts, we examined the adjusted relative risk of clinically significant labour-related adverse outcomes, including macrosomia (≥ 4500 at birth), post-partum haemorrhage (≥1000 ml), shoulder dystocia, 3rd or 4th degree perineal tear and unplanned caesarean section. Parity, maternal age and mode of birth were adjusted for using logistic regression. Results The study cohort included 91,314 women who birthed at 39 completed weeks and 4317 at ≥42 completed weeks. Compared to 39 weeks gestation, those giving birth ≥42 weeks gestation had an adjusted relative risk (aRR) of 1.85 (95% CI 1.55–2.20) for post-partum haemorrhage following vaginal birth, 2.29 (95% CI 1.89–2.78) following instrumental birth and 1.44 (95% CI 1.17–1.78) following emergency caesarean section; 1.43 (95% CI 1.16–1.77) for shoulder dystocia (for non-macrosomic babies); and 1.22 (95% CI 1.03–1.45) for 3rd or 4th degree perineal tear (all women). The adjusted relative risk of giving birth to a macrosomic baby was 10.19 (95% CI 8.26–12.57) among nulliparous women and 4.71 (95% CI 3.90–5.68) among multiparous women. The risk of unplanned caesarean section was 1.96 (95% CI 1.86–2.06) following any labour and 1.47 (95% CI 1.38–1.56) following induction of labour. Conclusions Giving birth at ≥42 weeks gestation may be an under-recognised risk factor for several important, labour-related adverse outcomes. Clinicians should be aware that labour at this advanced gestation incurs a higher risk of adverse outcomes. In addition to known perinatal risks, the risk of obstetric complications should be considered in the counselling of women labouring at post-term gestation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document