Effects of repeated straw incorporation on crop fertilizer nitrogen requirements, soil mineral nitrogen and nitrate leaching losses

1997 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 136-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. A. Nicholson ◽  
B. J. Chambers ◽  
A. R. Mills ◽  
P. J. Strachan
1999 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 115-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Stenberg ◽  
Helena Aronsson ◽  
Börje Lindén ◽  
Tomas Rydberg ◽  
Arne Gustafson

2009 ◽  
Vol 172 (4) ◽  
pp. 512-519 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirsten Seidel ◽  
Manfred Kayser ◽  
Jürgen Müller ◽  
Johannes Isselstein

1995 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 333-345
Author(s):  
C.L.M. De Visser ◽  
W. Van Den Berg ◽  
H. Niers

To study the relationship between the amount of soil mineral nitrogen before sowing of onions (Nmin) and the optimum amount of nitrogen fertilizer (Nopt), 36 multilevel fertilizer nitrogen trials were conducted in the Netherlands between 1978 and 1982. For 26 trials Nopt was within the studied range (0-200 kg N/ha) and could be estimated using a quadratic response function. A significant linear relationship between Nopt and Nmin before sowing was only found when Nmin in the layer 0-30 cm was considered. The same 26 trials were analysed together using a quadratic and a linear exponential response function. However, with both methods the yield predicted from Nmin did not prove to be superior to a fixed nitrogen application rate of about 125 kg of nitrogen/ha. A verification pointed out that the relationship overestimated the opt. amount of fertilizer nitrogen found in 8 independent multilevel fertilizer nitrogen trials. A fixed rate of 100-125 kg of nitrogen/ha yielded better results. The possible reasons for the absence of a strong relationship between the amount of soil mineral nitrogen before sowing and the opt. amount of nitrogen fertilizer are discussed.


2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (10) ◽  
pp. 4505-4520 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Dannenmann ◽  
Eugenio Díaz-Pinés ◽  
Barbara Kitzler ◽  
Kristiina Karhu ◽  
Javier Tejedor ◽  
...  

1989 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 237-256
Author(s):  
J.J. Neeteson ◽  
D.J. Greenwood ◽  
A. Draycott

To estimate the amount of nitrate lost due to leaching during the growth period of potatoes and the amount of mineral nitrogen present in the soil at harvest time, i.e. residual mineral nitrogen, calculations were performed with a previously derived simulation model for the response of potatoes to nitrogen. In the calculations those factors were varied that were considered to affect the amount of nitrate lost due to leaching: precipitation in spring and summer, soil type, mineralization rate of soil organic matter, and amount of fertilizer nitrogen applied. It was calculated that the total loss of nitrogen, i.e. the amounts leached in spring plus the amounts accumulated as residual soil mineral nitrogen, were similar in a loamy sand and a clay loam. The greater loss by leaching from the sand was offset by the greater accumulation of mineral nitrogen in the loam. Under normal conditions of precipitation and mineralization the total loss increased from about 20 kg N/ha at a fertilizer nitrogen application rate of 200 kg N/ha to about 190 kg N/ha at a rate of 400 kg N/ha. At a high rate of mineralization, an application as low as 100 kg fertilizer N/ha resulted in a total loss of about 60 kg N/ha. It was concluded that little nitrate leaching occurs when the current nitrogen fertilizer recommendations are followed, provided that mineralization in the soil proceeds at an average rate. When high mineralization rates are likely to occur, however, the recommendations should be lowered. (Abstract retrieved from CAB Abstracts by CABI’s permission)


Soil Science ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 147 (5) ◽  
pp. 371-377 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. P. DESTAIN ◽  
C. ROISIN ◽  
J. GUIOT ◽  
M. FRANKINET ◽  
Y. RAIMOND ◽  
...  

Geoderma ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 326 ◽  
pp. 9-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masuda Akter ◽  
Heleen Deroo ◽  
Eddy De Grave ◽  
Toon Van Alboom ◽  
Mohammed Abdul Kader ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. 13-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Conrad ◽  
N. Fohrer

Abstract. This study provides results for the optimization strategy of highly parameterized models, especially with a high number of unknown input parameters and joint problems in terms of sufficient parameter space. Consequently, the uncertainty in model parameterization and measurements must be considered when highly variable nitrogen losses, e.g. N leaching, are to be predicted. The Bayesian calibration methodology was used to investigate the parameter uncertainty of the process-based CoupModel. Bayesian methods link prior probability distributions of input parameters to likelihood estimates of the simulation results by comparison with measured values. The uncertainty in the updated posterior parameters can be used to conduct an uncertainty analysis of the model output. A number of 24 model variables were optimized during 20 000 simulations to find the "optimum" value for each parameter. The likelihood was computed by comparing simulation results with observed values of 23 output variables including soil water contents, soil temperatures, groundwater level, soil mineral nitrogen, nitrate concentrations below the root zone, denitrification and harvested carbon from grassland plots in Northern Germany for the period 1997–2002. The posterior parameter space was sampled with the Markov Chain Monte Carlo approach to obtain plot-specific posterior parameter distributions for each system. Posterior distributions of the parameters narrowed down in the accepted runs, thus uncertainty decreased. Results from the single-plot optimization showed a plausible reproduction of soil temperatures, soil water contents and water tensions in different soil depths for both systems. The model performed better for these abiotic system properties compared to the results for harvested carbon and soil mineral nitrogen dynamics. The high variability in modeled nitrogen leaching showed that the soil nitrogen conditions are highly uncertain associated with low modeling efficiencies. Simulated nitrate leaching was compared to more general, site-specific estimations, indicating a higher leaching during the seepage periods for both simulated grassland systems.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document