A survey of the production and use of animal manures in England and Wales. I. Pig manure

2006 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 124-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
K.A. Smith ◽  
A.J. Brewer ◽  
A. Dauven ◽  
D.W. Wilson
2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 66-74
Author(s):  
Benedict. O. Unagwu ◽  
Roseline. U. Ayogu ◽  
Vivian.O. Osadebe

The study investigated the effects of animal manures (cow manure, CoM; chicken droppings, CkD; and pig manure, PiM) applied at 15 t ha-1 equivalent rate on the soil and growth performance of okra grown in a degraded ultisol. The treatments (CoM; CoM; PiM and Control unamended) were laid out in a completely randomized design and replicated three times. Animal manure application had significant effects on soil properties. Soilorganic matter increased by over 9% in the amended treatment relative to the control treatment. Except for N, increases in P (circa 14-70%)and K (circa 15-46%) nutrients were higher for CkD treatment than in other  treatments. Generally, the amended treatments maintained a significantly higher (p ≤0.05) plant leave number, stem girth, plant height, okra pod length and yields when compared with the Control treatment. The results indicated that application of animal manure enhanced okra growth performance. The findings suggest that animal manure application can potentially increase okra yield when grown in a degraded soil. It is recommended that farmers use ample (15 t ha-1) ) quantity of animal manures to increase their crop yields, which invariably will enhance their income. Keywords: Soil fertility, organic fertilizers okra growth, okra yield response, farmers okra yeild.


Author(s):  
Kamrunnahar Kabery ◽  
Md. Anisuzzaman ◽  
U-Cheol Jeong ◽  
Seok-Joong Kang

Moina macrocopa was cultured with different animal manures (chicken manure, pig manure and cow manure) and food waste to determine the impact of these food sources on its mass production. All diets were provided at five different concentrations: 500, 1000, 2500, 5000 and 10000 ppm. Gross and net reproductive rates were higher in 1000 ppm concentration of food waste medium and the highest average population growth was obtained of about 9 org mL-1 whereas pig manure treatment showed the lowest among all the culture medium. The highest population density was observed in low concentration treatments, on the contrary, higher concentrations showed an adverse effect on M. macrocopa cultivation. The results of this study suggest that 1000 ppm concentration of food waste produces better results than other animal manures which showed the highest population density and exhibited a comparatively higher percentage of highly unsaturated fatty acids than the other treatments and could be an inexpensive and sustainable cultivation approach of Moina macrocopa.


2019 ◽  
Vol 99 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adin Y. Bloukounon-Goubalan ◽  
Aliou Saïdou ◽  
Noël Obognon ◽  
Guillaume L. Amadji ◽  
Attanda M. Igué ◽  
...  

This study aims to assess the decomposition of manure biodegraded by fly larvae and the nutrient mineralization rates to understand the efficiency of the biodegraded manures for further use as soil amendment. A litter bag experiment was carried out over 75 d in an Acrisol in Benin using poultry manure, pig manure, mixture of poultry and sheep manure, mixture of poultry and cow manure, and mixture of poultry and pig manure, biodegraded by Musca domestica larvae. Nutrients content in the manures during the different stages of decomposition was analyzed. The mono-component exponential model Yt = Y0 × e−kt best described the manure decomposition and nutrients mineralization. The manures decomposed fast in the soil, and their nutrients were released fast in the poultry manure, the mixture of poultry and pig manure, and the mixture of poultry and cow manure. Nutrient mineralization increased in the order of P < N < K or N < P < K. Biodegradation of animal manures by fly larvae produced high-quality organic fertilizer through fast N and P release. This could aid in reducing the quantities of these elements applied as mineral fertilizer by farmers for sustaining agricultural soil productivity.


1999 ◽  
Vol 70 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
F.A Nicholson ◽  
B.J Chambers ◽  
J.R Williams ◽  
R.J Unwin

Energies ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (16) ◽  
pp. 4257
Author(s):  
John G. Ingersoll

A novel process is proposed whereby wood wastes from forest tree mortalities and improved forest management are co-digested with high in nitrogen content animal manures to yield bio-methane along with nitrogen, phosphorous, and potassium bio-fertilizers. The process mimics the well-known wood conversion to methane process in lower termites but relies on thermophilic fungi, bacteria, and archaea instead. It is based on the modified state-of-the art two-step, hyperthermophilic (70 °C) hydrolysis and thermophilic (55 °C) fermentation, dry (30% TS), anaerobic digestion technology with a high organic loading and shortened retention time. The process is augmented with the thermophilic fermentation of carbon dioxide in the biogas into secondary bio-methane by employing hydrogen produced via wind-powered electrolysis. The entire process comprised of five distinct steps is designated as “Wood to Methane 3 + 2”. An industrial type, standardized plant unit has been developed that can be employed in a modular fashion. The implementation of these plant units across the US, utilizing the estimated waste wood potential along with 3/4 of the produced poultry and pig manure, would generate the equivalent of 2/3 of transportation fuel consumption and would supply about 11% of current US energy use per annum. The produced bio-methane can be cost-competitive only if it is employed as a transportation fuel to replace fossil gasoline and diesel fuels. The required annual investment over a 20-year period is well within the means of the US economy in a public–private development partnership.


2006 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. A. Smith ◽  
A. J. Brewer ◽  
J. Crabb ◽  
A. Dauven

2006 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 77-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
K.A. Smith ◽  
A.J. Brewer ◽  
J. Crabb ◽  
A. Dauven

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document