scholarly journals Genetic and behavioral differences among five inbred mouse strains commonly used in the production of transgenic and knockout mice

2004 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 149-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. W. M. Bothe ◽  
V. J. Bolivar ◽  
M. J. Vedder ◽  
J. G. Geistfeld
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Brandon A. Newmyer ◽  
Ciarra M. Whindleton ◽  
Nandan Srinivasa ◽  
Marieke K. Jones ◽  
Michael M. Scott

Abstract Identifying genetic variants that regulate binge eating (BE) is critical for understanding the factors that control this behavior and for the development of pharmacological treatment strategies. Although several studies have revealed specific genes capable of affecting BE behavior, less is known about how genetic variation modulates BE. Thus, through a paradigm that promoted binge-like food intake through intermittent access to high calorie diet (HCD), we quantified food-intake in four inbred mouse strains: C57Bl/6J (B6), NOD/LtJ (NOD), 129S1/SvlmJ (S1), and A/J (AJ). We report that genetic variation likely influences the chronic regulation of food intake and the binge-like consumption of a palatable HCD. AJ mice consumed more of both standard chow and HCD than the other three strains tested when both diets were available ad libitum, while S1 mice consumed significantly less HCD than other strains during intermittent HCD access. Behavioral differences were also associated with differential changes in c-Fos immunohistochemistry in brain regions traditionally associated with appetite regulation. Our results identify 129S1/SvlmJ as a strain that exhibits low levels of binge feeding behavior and suggests that this strain could be useful in the investigation of the influence of genetic variation in the control of binge food intake.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony Sclafani ◽  
Karen Ackroff

Inbred mouse strains differ in their postoral appetite stimulating response (appetition) to glucose and fructose. For example, C57BL/6J (B6) and FVB strains learn strong preferences for a flavor (CS+, e.g., cherry) paired with intragastric (IG) glucose infusions, but only FVB mice learned to prefer a CS+ paired with IG fructose infusions. Consistent with these findings, "tasteless" B6 knockout (KO) mice missing the taste signaling protein TRPM5 learn strong preferences for a CS+ added to glucose solution as well as for unflavored glucose but weak or no preferences for a fructose-paired CS+ or unflavored fructose. The present experiment reports that "tasteless" P2X2/P2X3 double-knockout (P2X2/3 DKO) mice, unlike TRPM5 KO mice, learned strong preferences for a CS+ mixed with fructose as well as for unflavored fructose. Whether differences in genetic backgrounds or other factors account for the fructose appetition displayed by P2X2/3 DKO mice but not TRPM5 KO mice remains to be determined.


Genetics ◽  
1982 ◽  
Vol 100 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-87
Author(s):  
Daniel W Nebert ◽  
Nancy M Jensen ◽  
Hisashi Shinozuka ◽  
Heinz W Kunz ◽  
Thomas J Gill

ABSTRACT Forty-four inbred and four randombred rat strains and 20 inbred mouse strains were examined for their Ah phenotype by determining the induction of liver microsomal aryl hydrocarbon (benzo[a]pyrene) hydroxylase activity (EC 1.14.14.1) by intraperitoneal treatment with either β-naphthoflavone or 3-methylcholanthrene. All 48 rat strains were found to be Ah-responsive. The maximally induced hydroxylase specific activities of the ALB/Pit, MNR/Pit, MR/Pit, SHR/Pit, and Sprague-Dawley strains were of the same order of magnitude as the basal hydroxylase specific activities of the ACI/Pit, F344/Pit, OKA/Pit, and MNR/N strains. Six of the 20 mouse strains were Ah-nonresponsive (i.e. lacking the normal induction response and presumably lacking detectable amounts of the Ah receptor). The basal hydroxylase specific activities of the BDL/N, NFS/N, STAR/N, and ST/JN mouse strains were more than twice as high as the maximally induced hydroxylase specific activity of the CBA/HT strain.——To date, 24 Ah-nonresponsive mouse strains have been identified, out of a total of 68 known to have been characterized. The reasons for not finding a single Ah-nonresponsive inbred rat strain—as compared with about one Ah-nonresponsive inbred mouse strain found for every three examined—remain unknown.


1999 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 295-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
John J. Albers ◽  
Wendy Pitman ◽  
Gertrud Wolfbauer ◽  
Marian C. Cheung ◽  
Hal Kennedy ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Holger Hackstein ◽  
Andreas Wachtendorf ◽  
Sabine Kranz ◽  
Jürgen Lohmeyer ◽  
Gregor Bein ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document