scholarly journals Improved migraine management in primary care: results of a patient treatment experience study using zolmitriptan orally disintegrating tablet

2006 ◽  
Vol 60 (12) ◽  
pp. 1530-1535 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. SHAPERO ◽  
A. DOWSON ◽  
J.-P. LACOSTE ◽  
P. ALMQVIST
2020 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-115
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Bradley ◽  
Andrew Shelton ◽  
Trevor Hodge ◽  
David Morris ◽  
Hilary Bekker ◽  
...  

Objective: To measure patient-reported impact of orthodontic treatment in terms of pre-treatment concerns, treatment experience and treatment outcome. Setting: Four sites in Yorkshire, including two secondary care settings (Leeds Dental Institute and St Luke’s Hospital, Bradford) and two specialist orthodontic practices. Design: Cross-sectional survey. Participants: NHS orthodontic patients (aged 12+ years) who have completed comprehensive orthodontic treatment, excluding orthognathic surgery and craniofacial anomalies. Methods: Participants were opportunistically identified by the direct clinical care team during scheduled appointments and those eligible were invited to participate. Data were collected using the Orthodontic Patient Treatment Impact Questionnaire (OPTIQ), a validated 12-item measure with questions relating to pre-treatment experience, impact of treatment and outcome from treatment. Results: Completed questionnaires for analysis included 120 from primary care and 83 from secondary care. The most common pre-treatment concerns were alignment (89%) and being embarrassed to smile (63%). The most common expectations from orthodontic treatment were improved confidence to eat (87%) and smile (72%) in front of others, improved appearance of teeth (85%) and reduced teasing/bullying (63%). Only 67% respondents recalled receiving written information and the lowest recall related to retainer type and length of retention. The most commonly reported complications were sore mouth (68%), fixed appliance breakage (61%) and gingivitis (39%). Treatment caused greatest impact in relation to pain, limitations in eating and effect on speech. Overall satisfaction with orthodontic treatment was reported by 96% of respondents, 87% would have orthodontic treatment again (if needed) and 91% would recommend treatment to a friend. Conclusions: The OPTIQ is a useful patient-reported tool to identify pre-treatment concerns and expectations, treatment experience and outcome. Orthodontic treatment leads to high levels of satisfaction.


Sexual Health ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole L. De La Mata ◽  
David A. Cooper ◽  
Darren Russell ◽  
Don Smith ◽  
Ian Woolley ◽  
...  

Background: Integrase inhibitors (INSTI) are a newer class of antiretroviral (ARV) drugs that offer additional treatment options for experienced patients. Our aim is to describe treatment durability and virological outcomes in treatment-experienced HIV-positive patients using INSTI-based regimens. Methods: All patients in the Australian HIV Observational Database who had received an INSTI-based regimen ≥ 14 days as well as previous therapy were included in the study. We defined two groups of treatment-experienced patients: (1) those starting a second-line regimen with INSTI; and (2) highly experienced patients, defined as having prior exposure to all three main ARV classes, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and protease inhibitors, before commencing INSTI. Survival methods were used to determine time to viral suppression and treatment switch, stratified by patient treatment experience. Covariates of interest included age, gender, hepatitis B and C co-infection, previous antiretroviral treatment time, patient treatment experience and baseline viral load. Results: Time to viral suppression and regimen switching from INSTI initiation was similar for second-line and highly experienced patients. The probability of achieving viral suppression at 6 months was 77.7% for second-line patients and 68.4% for highly experienced patients. There were 60 occurrences of regimen switching away from INSTI observed over 1274.0 person-years, a crude rate of 4.71 (95% CI: 3.66–6.07) per 100 person-years. Patient treatment experience was not a significant factor for regimen switch according to multivariate analysis, adjusting for relevant covariates. Conclusions: We found that INSTI-based regimens were potent and durable in experienced HIV-positive patients receiving treatment outside clinical trials. These results confirm that INSTI-based regimens are a robust treatment option.


2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Petelos ◽  
C Lionis

Abstract The speaker will discuss the role of primary care for all patients and cancer patients, elaborating on prescribing patterns vaccinations, recommendations for Over-The-Counter medicines (OTCs) nutritional supplements, and as well as its contribution of behavioural change to raise awareness and change prescription practice. The role of PoCT for reducing the threat of AMR and for improving the differential diagnosis will be discussed, according to the WHO Approach of “diagnostic stewardship” for the appropriate use of microbiological diagnostics to guide therapeutic decisions. In the context of syndromic surveillance and preparedness, as well as in terms of protecting cancer patients at times of epidemics, methods of specimen collection for limited community transmission and for the timely pathogen identification along with accurate, timely reporting of results to guide patient treatment will be discussed. The role of behavioural modification interventions will be discussed, incl. in relation to vaccination and the role it can play in AMR. Improvement of the survivorship experience will be examined in the context of improving health literacy. The case of Greece, currently having the highest antibiotic consumption in Europe and the fourth highest globally, along with an increasing trend on antibiotic use will also be discussed.


2005 ◽  
Vol 187 (6) ◽  
pp. 552-558 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Kisely ◽  
Mark Smith ◽  
David Lawrence ◽  
Sarah Maaten

BackgroundMost studies of mortality in psychiatric patients have investigated inpatients rather than those attending outpatient clinics or primary care, where most receive treatment.AimsTo evaluate the mortality risk in mental illness for patients in contact with psychiatric services or primary care (n=221 048) across Nova Scotia (population 936 025).MethodA population-based record-linkage analysis was made of the period 1995–2000, using an inception cohortto calculate mortality rate ratios.ResultsThe mortality rate was 1.74, with increased ratios for all major causes of death. Male mortality was almost double that of females after controlling for demographic factors, treatment setting and place of residence. Patients of lower income, in specialist psychiatric settings, and with dementia or psychoses were also at greater risk. However, in absolute numbers, 72% of deaths occurred in patients who had only seen their general practitioner.ConclusionsMortality risk is increased in all psychiatric patients, not just those who have received in-patient treatment.


Author(s):  
Debbie Anderson ◽  
Anne Boyter ◽  
Sean MacBride-Stewart ◽  
Douglas Cowan ◽  
Christine Bucknall

ABSTRACTObjectiveTo determine the acceptability of using data on medicines dispensed in primary care to inform out-patient treatment of patients with difficult-to-treat asthma. ApproachConsultant respiratory physicians’ access to a summary of all relevant medicines dispensed by community pharmacists to patients with difficult to treat asthma was piloted in 2015 (therapy review (TR)). Dispensed medicine data were collected using the patient’s unique NHS identifier. This information was aggregated monthly for the year before the patient attended their clinic appointment. Patients gave consent and the summary data were used to assess concordance with therapy and inform a discussion about future management. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with eight patients who had received TR and eight respiratory physicians: two with access to the summary. The interviews aimed to highlight the experiences of patients and physicians on the utility of therapy reviews the views of physicians without access to summaries on the prospective use of therapy reviews. With the participant’s consent, interviews were recorded and transcribed. Thematic analysis of grouped responses was conducted using NVivo software. ResultsAll physicians agreed that poor compliance remains a significant concern when treating patients with difficult asthma and supported the use of TR. Physicians with experience of TR identified reliability over current methods of assessing compliance; ability to inform future treatment; and assistance in the discussion of concordance as advantages. The lag of three months in available dispensed data was a disadvantage. Physicians without experience of TR raised concern that use may lead to confrontation: reflected in the experience of one patient who expressed that TR discouraged them from improving compliance. Additional interventions are needed to improve compliance. Opinions from other patients were positive and supported the inclusion of TR as part of a consultation. Physicians with experience of TR found the summary accessible, if access to computers containing specific software to view TR was available. This limitation was considered potentially problematic and physicians without access to TR expressed a preference to accessing TR via NHS Portal - a secure online platform permitting registered users access to patient-level information. ConclusionThis demonstrates the positive impact of using data about primary care dispensed medicine in secondary care to assess medicine concordance and inform individual patient’s ongoing treatment. This supplements other data collected from clinical tests and patient-physician discussion. Development of a more efficient system to access the summary data is required before it is more widely used.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document