scholarly journals From Point-of-Care Testing (PoCT) and vaccination to changing the care paradigm: the role of primary care

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Petelos ◽  
C Lionis

Abstract The speaker will discuss the role of primary care for all patients and cancer patients, elaborating on prescribing patterns vaccinations, recommendations for Over-The-Counter medicines (OTCs) nutritional supplements, and as well as its contribution of behavioural change to raise awareness and change prescription practice. The role of PoCT for reducing the threat of AMR and for improving the differential diagnosis will be discussed, according to the WHO Approach of “diagnostic stewardship” for the appropriate use of microbiological diagnostics to guide therapeutic decisions. In the context of syndromic surveillance and preparedness, as well as in terms of protecting cancer patients at times of epidemics, methods of specimen collection for limited community transmission and for the timely pathogen identification along with accurate, timely reporting of results to guide patient treatment will be discussed. The role of behavioural modification interventions will be discussed, incl. in relation to vaccination and the role it can play in AMR. Improvement of the survivorship experience will be examined in the context of improving health literacy. The case of Greece, currently having the highest antibiotic consumption in Europe and the fourth highest globally, along with an increasing trend on antibiotic use will also be discussed.

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. e040977
Author(s):  
Nga Thi Thuy Do ◽  
Rachel Claire Greer ◽  
Yoel Lubell ◽  
Sabine Dittrich ◽  
Maida Vandendorpe ◽  
...  

IntroductionC-reactive protein (CRP), a biomarker of infection, has been used widely in high-income settings to guide antibiotic treatment in patients presenting with respiratory illnesses in primary care. Recent trials in low- and middle-income countries showed that CRP testing could safely reduce antibiotic use in patients with non-severe acute respiratory infections (ARIs) and fever in primary care. The studies, however, were conducted in a research-oriented context, with research staff closely monitoring healthcare behaviour thus potentially influencing healthcare workers’ prescribing practices. For policy-makers to consider wide-scale roll-out, a pragmatic implementation study of the impact of CRP point of care (POC) testing in routine care is needed.Methods and analysisA pragmatic, cluster-randomised controlled trial, with two study arms, consisting of 24 commune health centres (CHC) in the intervention arm (provision of CRP tests with additional healthcare worker guidance) and 24 facilities acting as controls (routine care). Comparison between the treatment arms will be through logistic regression, with the treatment assignment as a fixed effect, and the CHC as a random effect. With 48 clusters, an average of 10 consultations per facility per week will result in approximately 520 over 1 year, and 24 960 in total (12 480 per arm). We will be able to detect a reduction of 12% to 23% or more in immediate antibiotic prescription as a result of the CRP POC intervention. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patient consultations for ARI resulting in immediate antibiotic prescription. Secondary endpoints include the proportion of all patients receiving an antibiotic prescription regardless of ARI diagnosis, frequency of re-consultation, subsequent antibiotic use when antibiotics are not prescribed, referral and hospitalisation.Ethics and disseminationThe study protocol was approved by the Oxford University Tropical Research Ethics Committee (OxTREC, Reference: 53–18), and the ethical committee of the National Hospital for Tropical Diseases in Vietnam (Reference:07/HDDD-NDTW/2019). Results from this study will be disseminated via meetings with stakeholders, conferences and publications in peer-reviewed journals. Authorship and reporting of this work will follow international guidelines.Trial registration detailsNCT03855215; Pre-results.


BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. e026792
Author(s):  
Selina Patel ◽  
Arnoupe Jhass ◽  
Susan Hopkins ◽  
Laura Shallcross

IntroductionEcological and individual-level evidence indicates that there is an association between level of antibiotic exposure and the emergence and spread of antibiotic resistance. The Global Point Prevalence Survey in 2015 estimated that 34.4% of hospital inpatients globally received at least one antimicrobial. Antimicrobial stewardship to optimise antibiotic use in secondary care can reduce the high risk of patients acquiring and transmitting drug-resistant infections in this setting. However, differences in the availability of data on antibiotic use in this context make it difficult to develop a consensus of how to comparably monitor antibiotic prescribing patterns across secondary care. This review will aim to document and critically evaluate methods and measures to monitor antibiotic use in secondary care.Methods and analysisWe will search Medline (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and websites of key organisations for published reports where an attempt to measure antibiotic usage among adult inpatients in high-income hospital settings has been made. Two independent reviewers will screen the studies for eligibility, extract data and assess the study quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. A description of the methods and measures used in antibiotic consumption surveillance will be presented. An adaptation of the Affordability, Practicability, Effectiveness, Acceptability, Side-effects Equity framework will be used to consider the practicality of implementing different approaches to measuring antibiotic usage in secondary care settings. A descriptive comparison of definitions and estimates of (in)appropriate antibiotic usage will also be carried out.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval is not required for this study as no primary data will be collected. The results will be published in relevant peer-reviewed journals and presented at relevant conferences or meetings where possible. This review will inform future approaches to scale up antibiotic consumption surveillance strategies to attempt to maximise impact through standardisation.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42018103375


Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 2791-2791
Author(s):  
Christen Lykkegaard Andersen ◽  
Volkert Siersma ◽  
Hans Carl Hasselbalch ◽  
Ole Weis Bjerrum ◽  
Peter Felding ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction An association between thrombocytosis and cancer is well established and several studies have shown that an elevated platelet count at diagnosis implies an inferior prognosis. In ovarian cancer, the pivotal role of platelets in driving the biologic mechanisms of malignant tumors has been demonstrated and paraneoplastic thrombocytosis has been shown to directly fuel tumor growth (Stone et al, N Engl J Med. 2012). In this epidemiological study, we assess the role of prediagnostic platelet levels in primary care patients subsequently diagnosed with gynecological cancer. Methods Using a primary care resource comprising blood differential cell counts from more than 500,000 individuals (Andersen et al, Clin Epidemiol. 2014), we included adults (18-80 years) diagnosed with gynecological cancer (ICD-10 codes C51-C58) as reported in the Danish Cancer Registry (DCR) between July 1, 2003 to January 23, 2010. We analyzed platelet counts in a 3-year period before cancer diagnosis and defined no prediagnostic thrombocytosis as a mean platelet count between 150-400x109/l, mild prediagnostic thrombocytosis as >400-550x109/l and severe prediagnosticthrombocytosis as >550x109/l. Statistical Analysis We used multivariable logistic regression to compute odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between prediagnostic thrombocytosis groups and cancer stage category (localized vs. non-localized) at the time of diagnosis (Table 1). The ORs were adjusted for known and possible confounders such as age (quadratic), year and month of blood sampling, as well as competing comorbid conditions as reported in the Danish National Patient Register. Furthermore, we analyzed time from diagnosis to all-cause mortality (as reported in the Danish Civil Registration System) in Cox regression models. The effects of prediagnostic thrombocytosis were estimated with hazard ratios (HRs) and adjusted for cancer stage category in addition to the above-mentioned confounders. Results A total of 1,083 women were diagnosed in the defined period comprising external female genital organs and vagina (5.1%), cervix uteri (24.8%), corpus uteri (37.2%), ovary, fallopian tube and broad ligament (32.5%) and other and unspecified female genital organs (0.4%). 614 of these patients (57%) had at least one available prediagnostic platelet measurement (mean number of measurements=1.62, SD=1.19, range=1-17) and 109 exhibited prediagnostic thrombocytosis (mild=76%, severe=24%). We observed significant associations between prediagnostic thrombocytosis and the risk of being diagnosed with advanced disease with ORs of 2.19 (1.25-3.84), P=0.006 and 3.80 (1.37-10.57), P=0.0104 for mild and severe prediagnostic thrombocytosis, respectively. The median overall survival among patients with severe prediagnostic thrombocytosis was 0.92 years, as compared with 3.34 years among those with mild prediagnostic thrombocytosis, P<0.0001 (Figure 1). When analyzing mortality rates and adjusting for cancer stage category at diagnosis, HRs were 1.52 (1.09-2.13), P=0.0145 and 3.46 (2.17-5.51), P<0.0001 for mild and severe prediagnostic thrombocytosis, respectively. Lastly, we analyzed all-cause mortality rates for localized cancer cases only and observed a significant association with severe (but not mild) prediagnostic thrombocytosis with a HR of 4.21 (1.22-14.55), P=0.032. Discussion This study demonstrates that prediagnostic thrombocytosis in gynecological cancer patients infers higher risks of advanced disease at time of diagnosis and inferior prognosis, not only due to the dissemination per se. In localized cancer, severe prediagnostic thrombocytosis also increases mortality with potential implications for the diagnostic work-up in these patients at initial referral to hospital. Table 1: Algorithms for cancer staging according to the TNM classification Tumor stage T N M Localized T1-4,x and N0 and M0 T1 and N0,x and M0,x T2 and N0 and Mx Non-localized T1-4,x and N1-3 or M1 Undefined T2-4,x and Nx and M0,x T3-4,x and N0 and Mx Figure 1: Kaplan-Meier estimates of survival time for gynecological cancer patients stratified by prediagnostic thrombocytosis groups. Figure 1:. Kaplan-Meier estimates of survival time for gynecological cancer patients stratified by prediagnostic thrombocytosis groups. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


PLoS Medicine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (8) ◽  
pp. e1003737
Author(s):  
Liz Morrell ◽  
James Buchanan ◽  
Laurence S. J. Roope ◽  
Koen B. Pouwels ◽  
Christopher C. Butler ◽  
...  

Background Delayed (or “backup”) antibiotic prescription, where the patient is given a prescription but advised to delay initiating antibiotics, has been shown to be effective in reducing antibiotic use in primary care. However, this strategy is not widely used in the United Kingdom. This study aimed to identify factors influencing preferences among the UK public for delayed prescription, and understand their relative importance, to help increase appropriate use of this prescribing option. Methods and findings We conducted an online choice experiment in 2 UK general population samples: adults and parents of children under 18 years. Respondents were presented with 12 scenarios in which they, or their child, might need antibiotics for a respiratory tract infection (RTI) and asked to choose either an immediate or a delayed prescription. Scenarios were described by 7 attributes. Data were collected between November 2018 and February 2019. Respondent preferences were modelled using mixed-effects logistic regression. The survey was completed by 802 adults and 801 parents (75% of those who opened the survey). The samples reflected the UK population in age, sex, ethnicity, and country of residence. The most important determinant of respondent choice was symptom severity, especially for cough-related symptoms. In the adult sample, the probability of choosing delayed prescription was 0.53 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.50 to 0.56, p < 0.001) for a chesty cough and runny nose compared to 0.30 (0.28 to 0.33, p < 0.001) for a chesty cough with fever, 0.47 (0.44 to 0.50, p < 0.001) for sore throat with swollen glands, and 0.37 (0.34 to 0.39, p < 0.001) for sore throat, swollen glands, and fever. Respondents were less likely to choose delayed prescription with increasing duration of illness (odds ratio (OR) 0.94 (0.92 to 0.96, p < 0.001)). Probabilities of choosing delayed prescription were similar for parents considering treatment for a child (44% of choices versus 42% for adults, p = 0.04). However, parents differed from the adult sample in showing a more marked reduction in choice of the delayed prescription with increasing duration of illness (OR 0.83 (0.80 to 0.87) versus 0.94 (0.92 to 0.96) for adults, p for heterogeneity p < 0.001) and a smaller effect of disruption of usual activities (OR 0.96 (0.95 to 0.97) versus 0.93 (0.92 to 0.94) for adults, p for heterogeneity p < 0.001). Females were more likely to choose a delayed prescription than males for minor symptoms, particularly minor cough (probability 0.62 (0.58 to 0.66, p < 0.001) for females and 0.45 (0.41 to 0.48, p < 0.001) for males). Older people, those with a good understanding of antibiotics, and those who had not used antibiotics recently showed similar patterns of preferences. Study limitations include its hypothetical nature, which may not reflect real-life behaviour; the absence of a “no prescription” option; and the possibility that study respondents may not represent the views of population groups who are typically underrepresented in online surveys. Conclusions This study found that delayed prescription appears to be an acceptable approach to reducing antibiotic consumption. Certain groups appear to be more amenable to delayed prescription, suggesting particular opportunities for increased use of this strategy. Prescribing choices for sore throat may need additional explanation to ensure patient acceptance, and parents in particular may benefit from reassurance about the usual duration of these illnesses.


Author(s):  
yale tung chen ◽  
Rafael Llamas Fuentes ◽  
Pablo Rodriguez Fuertes

INTRODUCTION: Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a highly contagious illness caused by the Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). There is growing evidence regarding the imaging findings of COVID-19, in Chest X-ray and CT scan, however their availability in this pandemic outbreak might be compromised. At this moment, the role of Point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) has yet to be explored. OBJECTIVES: The main purpose of this study is to describe the POCUS findings of the disease in COVID-19 patients admitted to the emergency department (ED). Determining the correlation of these parameters with vital signs, laboratory results and chest X-ray, as well as, therapeutic decisions and prognosis. METHODS: Prospective study carried out in the emergency department (ED) of two academic hospitals. High suspicion or confirmed COVID-19 patients were subjected to the ultrasonographic measurement of the inferior vena cava (IVC), focused cardiac ultrasound (FOCUS), and Lung Ultrasonography (Lung POCUS). RESULTS: Between March and April 2020, ninety-six patients were enrolled. The mean age was 68.2 years (SD 17.5). The most common finding in Lung POCUS was an irregular pleural line (63.2%) followed by bilateral confluent (55.2%) and isolated B-lines (53.1%), which was associated with a positive RT-PCR (OR 4.729, 95% CI: 1.989-11.246; p<0.001), and correlated with IL-6 levels (rho = 0.622; p = 0.002). The IVC moderately correlated with levels of pO2, expiratory (rho = -0.539; p =0.014) and inspiratory (rho = -0.527; p =0.017), with troponin I (rho = 0.509; p=0.03). After POCUS exam, almost 20% of the patients had an associated condition that required a change in the treatment or management. CONCLUSION: In this pandemic era, as the shortage of resources constitutes an undeniable public health threat, POCUS presents the potential to impact in diagnosis, management and prognosis of our confirmed or suspected COVID-19 patients.


2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabel Frost ◽  
Thomas P Van Boeckel ◽  
João Pires ◽  
Jessica Craig ◽  
Ramanan Laxminarayan

Abstract Background Rising antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a threat to modern medicine, and increasing international mobility facilitates the spread of AMR. Infections with resistant organisms have higher morbidity and mortality, are costlier to treat, result in longer hospital stays and place a greater burden on health systems than infections caused by susceptible organisms. Here we review the role of travel in the international dissemination of AMR and consider actions at the levels of travelers, travel medicine practitioners and policymakers that would mitigate this threat. Results Resistant pathogens do not recognize international borders; travelers to areas with high AMR prevalence are likely to be exposed to resistant bacteria and return to their home countries colonized. Medical tourists go between health facilities with drastically different rates of AMR, potentially transmitting highly resistant strains. Drug-resistant bacteria have been found in every continent; however, differences between countries in the prevalence of AMR depend on multiple factors. These include levels of antibiotic consumption (including inappropriate use), access to clean water, adequate sanitation, vaccination coverage, the availability of quality healthcare and access to high-quality medical products. Conclusions Travelers to areas with high levels of AMR should have vaccines up to date, be aware of ways of treating and preventing travelers’ diarrhea (other than antibiotic use) and be informed on safe sexual practices. The healthcare systems of low- and middle-income countries require investment to reduce the transmission of resistant strains by improving access to clean water, sanitation facilities and vaccines. Efforts are needed to curb inappropriate antibiotic use worldwide. In addition, more surveillance is needed to understand the role of the movement of humans, livestock and food products in resistance transmission. The travel medicine community has a key role to play in advocating for the recognition of AMR as a priority on the international health agenda. Key policy recommendations AMR is a threat to modern medicine, and international travel plays a key role in the spread of highly resistant strains. It is essential that this is addressed at multiple levels. Individual travelers can reduce antibiotic consumption and the likelihood of infection. Travelers should have up-to-date vaccines and be informed on methods of preventing and treating travelers’ diarrhea, other than use of antibiotics and on safe sexual practices, such as condom use. Healthcare facilities need to be aware of the travel history of patients to provide appropriate treatment to those who are at high risk of exposure and to prevent further spread. Internationally, in countries without reliable and universal access to clean water, sanitation and hygiene, investment is needed to reduce the emergence and spread of resistance and ensure the antimicrobials available are of assured quality. High-income countries must ensure their use of antimicrobials is appropriate to reduce selection for AMR. Surveillance across all countries is needed to monitor and respond to this emerging threat.


2017 ◽  
Vol 67 (656) ◽  
pp. e168-e177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tau-Hong Lee ◽  
Joshua GX Wong ◽  
David CB Lye ◽  
Mark IC Chen ◽  
Victor WK Loh ◽  
...  

BackgroundAcute upper respiratory infections (AURI) are the leading causes of antibiotic prescribing in primary care although antibiotics are often not indicated.AimTo gain an understanding of the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of GPs in Singapore and the associated latent factors to guide the implementation of an effective programme to reduce antibiotic use in primary care.Design and setting:An anonymous survey on the KAP of antibiotic use in AURI of GPs in Singapore.MethodKAP survey questionnaires were posted to all GPs from a database. To ascertain the latent factors affecting prescribing patterns, exploratory factor analysis was performed.ResultsAmong 427 responses, 351 (82.2%) were from GPs working in private practice. It was found that 58.4% of GPs in the private versus 72.4% of those in the public sector recognised that >80% of AURIs were caused by viruses (P = 0.02). The majority of GPs (353/427; 82.7%) felt that antibiotics were overprescribed in primary care. Significant factors associated with low antibiotic prescribing were good medical knowledge and clinical competency (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.4 to 4.3), good clinical practice (aOR 2.7 [95% CI = 2.0 to 3.6]), availability of diagnostic tests (aOR 1.4 [95% CI = 1.1 to 1.8]), and desire to improve clinical practice (aOR 1.5 [95% CI = 1.2 to 1.9]). The conservative practice of giving antibiotics ‘to be on the safe side’ is significantly less likely to be associated with low antibiotic prescribing (aOR 0.7 [95% CI = 0.5 to 0.9]).ConclusionThis is the first KAP survey on antibiotic prescribing for AURI among GPs in Singapore. With the latent factors identified, future interventions should be directed at addressing these factors to reduce inappropriate antibiotic prescribing.


2017 ◽  
Vol 66 (1) ◽  
pp. 119-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcin Ciszewski ◽  
Tomasz Czekaj ◽  
Eligia M. Szewczyk

Unreasonable antibacterial therapy is suspected to be the main reason of emergence of multi-resistant bacteria. The connection between seasonal variability of antibiotic use and reasonable antibacterial therapy has been described. We examined the issue basing on the data obtained from the primary care system in Szczecin (Poland) in order to verify the situation in this region of Central Europe. Increase in antibiotic consumption in a viral infection season was proved to be statistically significant. Statistically significant differences in various drug forms dispensation were also observed. Increased consumption of antibiotics in seasons of influenza-like illnesses might be connected with a lack of proper diagnostics or numerous cases of bacterial co-infections.


Author(s):  
Miranda So ◽  
Andrew M Morris ◽  
Alexander M Walker

Background: Empirical antibiotics are not recommended for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Methods: In this retrospective study, patients admitted to Toronto General Hospital’s general internal medicine from the emergency department for COVID-19 between March 1 and August 31, 2020 were compared with those admitted for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in 2020 and 2019 in the same months. The primary outcome was antibiotics use pattern: prevalence and concordance with COVID-19 or CAP guidelines. The secondary outcome was antibiotic consumption in days of therapy (DOT)/100 patient-days. We extracted data from electronic medical records. We used logistic regression to model the association between disease and receipt of antibiotics, linear regression to compare DOT. Results: The COVID-19, CAP 2020, and CAP 2019 groups had 67, 73, and 120 patients, respectively. Median age was 71 years; 58.5% were male. Prevalence of antibiotic use was 70.2%, 97.3%, and 90.8% for COVID-19, CAP 2020, and CAP 2019, respectively. Compared with CAP 2019, the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for receiving antibiotics was 0.23 (95% CI 0.10 to 0.53, p = 0.001) and 3.42 (95% CI 0.73 to 15.95, p = 0.117) for COVID-19 and CAP 2020, respectively. Among patients receiving antibiotics within 48 hours of admission, compared with CAP 2019, the aOR for guideline-concordant combination regimens was 2.28 (95% CI 1.08 to 4.83, p = 0.031) for COVID-19 and 1.06 (95% CI 0.55 to 2.05, p = 0.856) for CAP-2020. Difference in mean DOT/100 patient-days was –24.29 ( p = 0.009) comparing COVID-19 with CAP 2019, and +28.56 ( p = 0.003) comparing CAP 2020 with CAP 2019. Conclusions: There are opportunities for antimicrobial stewardship to address unnecessary antibiotic use.


2012 ◽  
Vol 20 (12) ◽  
pp. 3071-3078 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Hall ◽  
Nicola Gray ◽  
Susan Browne ◽  
Sue Ziebland ◽  
Neil C. Campbell

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document