Pipe Flow Models of a Kentucky Limestone Aquifer

Ground Water ◽  
1974 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 202-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Thrailkill
2014 ◽  
Vol 955-959 ◽  
pp. 3120-3124
Author(s):  
Kai Bian ◽  
Shi Lei Chen ◽  
Xue Yuan Li ◽  
Ying Wang Zhao

In order to figure out seepage field in aquifer under the coal seam, the geology and hydrogeology conditions systematically of study area were analyzed, hydrogeological conceptual model was generalized, mathematical model was built, seepage field of the Taiyuan limestone aquifer was simulated with software Feflow. Simulation results show that hydrogeological parameters of Taiyuan limestone aquifer change greatly in different partitions. The model also indicates the heterogeneity of karst fissure of Taiyuan limestone aquifer. The drainage quantity is from the Ordovician limestone aquifer besides supplying from runoff of upstream and capture excretion of downstream. The research is an attempt to simulate the seepage field in aquifer under coal seam, to some extent, it also provides a technical basis for safe coal mining and as a reference for simulation constructions of three-dimensional groundwater flow models in similar coal mines.


1988 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. 273-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
B.C.R. Ewan ◽  
K. Moodie ◽  
P.J. Harper

Author(s):  
Florentina Popa ◽  
Andrey Filippov ◽  
Brent C. Houchens

One-dimensional (1D), equilibrium-based mechanistic model predictions are compared to three-dimensional (3D) transient computational fluid dynamics results for horizontal two-phase, gas-liquid pipe flow. The 3D regions of interest include both those expected to be in equilibrium conditions and those where transitions between flow regimes occur. Equilibrium simulations, such as those for stratified flow in a horizontal pipe, allow crucial validation of the equilibrium-based closure relations by means of numerical experiments. In the transitional regions, fully 3D, time-dependent numerical simulations provide a means to estimate the error in the equilibrium-based models and suggest how reasonable approximations can be made in these regions.


1966 ◽  
Vol 88 (3) ◽  
pp. 285-294 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. J. Moody

Existing flow models are applied to predict maximum two-phase flow from a constant area, adiabatic pipe with friction. Graphs are given for maximum steam/water flow rate in terms of pipe f(L/D) and entrance stagnation properties. Theoretical blow-downs are graphed for 1000 and 2000 psia saturated-water systems with f(L/D) ranging from 0.0 to 100. Estimated pipe flow rates and blowdown transients are compared with steam/water data. Reasonable agreement is shown.


1993 ◽  
Vol 29 (11) ◽  
pp. 3699-3708 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Fourar ◽  
S. Bories ◽  
R. Lenormand ◽  
P. Persoff

2000 ◽  
Vol 627 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. E. Swanson ◽  
M. Landreman ◽  
J. Michel ◽  
J. Kakalios

ABSTRACTWhen an initially homogeneous binary mixture of granular media such as fine and coarse sand is poured near the closed edge of a “quasi-two-dimensional” Hele-Shaw cell consisting of two vertical transparent plates held a narrow distance apart, the mixture spontaneously forms alternating segregated layers. Experimental measurements of this stratification effect are reported in order to determine which model, one which suggests that segregation only occurs when the granular material contained within a metastable heap between the critical and maximum angle of repose avalanches down the free surface, or one for which the segregation results from smaller particles becoming trapped in the top surface and being removed from the moving layer during continuous flow. The result reported here indicate that the Metastable Wedge model provides a natural explanation for the initial mixed zone which precedes the formation of the layers, while the Continuous Flow model explains the observed upward moving kink of segregated material for higher granular flux rates, and that both mechansims are necessary in order to understand the observed pairing of segregated layersfor intermediate flow rates and cell separations.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Boris V. Dzyubenko ◽  
Guenrikh A. Dreitser

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document