scholarly journals Short wavelength light filtering by the natural human lens and IOLs - implications for entrainment of circadian rhythm

2011 ◽  
Vol 91 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam Elias Brøndsted ◽  
Jesper Holm Lundeman ◽  
Line Kessel
2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 66-86
Author(s):  
Christopher Höhn ◽  
Sarah R. Schmid ◽  
Christina P. Plamberger ◽  
Kathrin Bothe ◽  
Monika Angerer ◽  
...  

Smartphone usage strongly increased in the last decade, especially before bedtime. There is growing evidence that short-wavelength light affects hormonal secretion, thermoregulation, sleep and alertness. Whether blue light filters can attenuate these negative effects is still not clear. Therefore, here, we present preliminary data of 14 male participants (21.93 ± 2.17 years), who spent three nights in the sleep laboratory, reading 90 min either on a smartphone (1) with or (2) without a blue light filter, or (3) on printed material before bedtime. Subjective sleepiness was decreased during reading on a smartphone, but no effects were present on evening objective alertness in a GO/NOGO task. Cortisol was elevated in the morning after reading on the smartphone without a filter, which resulted in a reduced cortisol awakening response. Evening melatonin and nightly vasodilation (i.e., distal-proximal skin temperature gradient) were increased after reading on printed material. Early slow wave sleep/activity and objective alertness in the morning were only reduced after reading without a filter. These results indicate that short-wavelength light affects not only circadian rhythm and evening sleepiness but causes further effects on sleep physiology and alertness in the morning. Using a blue light filter in the evening partially reduces these negative effects.


2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 728-735 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melanie Knufinke ◽  
Lennart Fittkau-Koch ◽  
Els I. S. Møst ◽  
Michiel A. J. Kompier ◽  
Arne Nieuwenhuys

2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (6) ◽  
pp. 459-468 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuel Spitschan ◽  
Rafael Lazar ◽  
Christian Cajochen

2014 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 690-697 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marina C. Giménez ◽  
Domien G. M. Beersma ◽  
Pauline Bollen ◽  
Matthijs L. van der Linden ◽  
Marijke C. M. Gordijn

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 391-400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Soyeon Baik ◽  
Yocelyn Recinos ◽  
Joshua A. Chevez ◽  
David D. Au ◽  
Todd C. Holmes

Short-wavelength light guides many behaviors that are crucial for an insect’s survival. In Drosophila melanogaster, short-wavelength light induces both attraction and avoidance behaviors. How light cues evoke two opposite valences of behavioral responses remains unclear. Here, we comprehensively examine the effects of (1) light intensity, (2) timing of light (duration of exposure, circadian time of day), and (3) phototransduction mechanisms processing light information that determine avoidance versus attraction behavior assayed at high spatiotemporal resolution in Drosophila. External opsin-based photoreceptors signal for attraction behavior in response to low-intensity ultraviolet (UV) light. In contrast, the cell-autonomous neuronal photoreceptors, CRYPTOCHROME (CRY) and RHODOPSIN 7 (RH7), signal avoidance responses to high-intensity UV light. In addition to binary attraction versus avoidance behavioral responses to UV light, flies show distinct clock-dependent spatial preference within a light environment coded by different light input channels.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document