scholarly journals Engaging patients and families in communication across transitions of care: an integrative review protocol

2016 ◽  
Vol 72 (7) ◽  
pp. 1689-1700 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tracey K. Bucknall ◽  
Alison M. Hutchinson ◽  
Mari Botti ◽  
Lauren McTier ◽  
Helen Rawson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transitions Of Care ◽  
Integrative Review ◽  
Review Protocol

Engaging patients and families in communication across transitions of care: An integrative review

2020 ◽  
Vol 103 (6) ◽  
pp. 1104-1117
Author(s):  
Tracey K. Bucknall ◽  
Alison M. Hutchinson ◽  
Mari Botti ◽  
Lauren McTier ◽  
Helen Rawson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transitions Of Care ◽  
Integrative Review

scholarly journals Exploring the factors that affect new graduates’ transition from students to health professionals: a systematic integrative review protocol

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. e033734
Author(s):  
Eric Nkansah Opoku ◽  
Lana Van Niekerk ◽  
Lee-Ann Jacobs-Nzuzi Khuabi
Keyword(s):  
Health Professionals ◽  
Relevant Literature ◽  
Health Science ◽  
Integrative Review ◽  
Reference List ◽  
New Graduates ◽  
New Graduate ◽  
Ethical Approval ◽  
Boolean Search ◽  
Review Protocol

IntroductionTo become a competent health professional, the nature of new graduates’ transition plays a fundamental role. The systematic integrative review will aim to identify the existing literature pertaining to the barriers during transition, the facilitators and the evidence-based coping strategies that assist new graduate health professionals to successfully transition from students to health professionals.Methods and analysisThe integrative review will be conducted using Whittemore and Knafl’s integrative review methodology. Boolean search terms have been developed in consultation with an experienced librarian, using Medical Subject Heading terms on Medline. The following electronic databases have been chosen to ensure that all relevant literature are captured for this review: PubMed, EBSCOhost (including Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Medline, Academic Search Premier, Health Science: Nursing and Academic Edition), Scopus and Web of Science. A follow-up on the reference list of selected articles will be done to ensure that all relevant literature is included. The Covidence platform will be used to facilitate the process.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval is not required for this integrative review since the existing literature will be synthesised. The integrative review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal once all the steps have been completed. The findings will also be presented at international and national conferences to ensure maximum dissemination.

scholarly journals Knowledge mobilisation in bridging community-practice–academia-policy through meaningful engagement: systematic integrative review protocol focusing on studies conducted on health and wellness among immigrant communities

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. e036081 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tanvir C Turin ◽  
Nashit Chowdhury ◽  
Marcus Vaska ◽  
Nahid Rumana ◽  
Mohammad Ali Ashraf Lasker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Grey Literature ◽  
Relevant Literature ◽  
Integrative Review ◽  
Community Practice ◽  
Health And Wellness ◽  
Immigrant Communities ◽  
Knowledge Mobilisation ◽  
Hand Search ◽  
Review Protocol ◽  
Government Websites

IntroductionThough the importance of knowledge mobilisation has been established globally in health and wellness research, a certain degree of ambiguity remains regarding the meaning and extent of knowledge mobilisation activities and how they have been implemented. In this study, we aim to explore the different descriptions of knowledge mobilisation and the diverse ways mobilisation activities have been realised by different researchers working for the betterment of health and wellness of immigrant communities in their host countries.Methods and analysisWe aimed to conduct an integrative review to organise the available literature describing knowledge mobilisation pertaining to health and wellness in immigrant communities. We will employ a comprehensive search, using appropriate search-terms, to identify relevant literature and will qualitatively synthesise the information toward fulfilling our objectives. Specific methodological and analytical frameworks related to the integrative review process will guide each step of the process. A librarian designed the systematic search of the academic and grey literature from database inception to December 2019. The databases include MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase, PsycINFO, PubMed, CINAHL and SocINDEX. For grey literature, we will conduct searches in AHS Insite, Google, Google Scholar, OAISter and government websites. A two-stage (title–abstract and full-text) screening will be conducted, including single-citation tracking and hand search of reference lists.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval is not required for this review. We first plan to disseminate the results of our systematic review protocol through meetings with key stakeholders, followed by appropriate publications and presentations at applicable platforms. We also have opted for an integrated knowledge translation or community-engaged knowledge mobilisation approach where we have engaged with community-based citizen researchers from the inception of our research.

scholarly journals Reasoning like a doctor or like a nurse? An integrative review protocol

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. e049862
Author(s):  
Jettie Vreugdenhil ◽  
Sunia Somra ◽  
Hans Ket ◽  
Eugène J F M Custers ◽  
Marcel E Reinders ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Data Analysis ◽  
Clinical Reasoning ◽  
Selection Process ◽  
Integrative Review ◽  
Conceptual Clarity ◽  
Search Data ◽  
Review Protocol ◽  
Comprehensive Search ◽  
Set Up ◽  
Meta Analyses

IntroductionClinical reasoning, a major competency for all health professionals, has been defined and studied ‘within’ each profession. We do not know if content, process and outcomes are comparable ‘between’ physician and nursing clinical reasoning. This paper aims to set up a protocol for an integrative review to analyse and synthesise the scientific nursing and medical clinical reasoning literature. It builds on the history of nursing and medical clinical reasoning research and aims to create a higher level of conceptual clarity of clinical reasoning, to increase mutual understanding in collaboration in patient care, education and research.Methods and analysisThis integrative review follows stepwise the methods described by Whittmore and Knafl: problem identification, literature search, data evaluation, data analysis and presentation.The initial systematic and comprehensive search strategy is developed in collaboration with the clinical librarian and is performed in electronic databases, PubMed, CINAHL, PsycInfo and Web of Science from 30 March 2020 to 27 May 2020. Empirical and theoretical studies are included. This search will be accompanied by ancestry searching and purposeful sampling. A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow chart will summarise the selection process. The quality of eligible studies will be evaluated with a checklist, suitable for diverse study methods.The data analysis is inspired by concept analysis of Walker and Avant and layered analysis of an intervention of Cianciolo and Regehr. We will extract the data of the included studies conforming these layers and features, to capture the multifaceted nature of clinical reasoning in both professions. The data will be presented in a validity matrix to facilitate comparing and contrasting.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval is not required. The outcomes will be disseminated through conference presentations and publications.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document