scholarly journals The impact of compassionate care education on nurses: A mixed‐method systematic review

2019 ◽  
Vol 75 (11) ◽  
pp. 2340-2351 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alice Coffey ◽  
Mohamad M. Saab ◽  
Margaret Landers ◽  
Nicola Cornally ◽  
Josephine Hegarty ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (11) ◽  
pp. 552-564 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Thavaraj ◽  
Karen Gillett

Aims: We aimed to answer the question: what is the evidence that post-registration palliative care education for nurses improves practice? Background: The 2008 End of Life Care Strategy emphasised the need for a workforce equipped to provide high-quality end-of-life care for patients and their families. As registered nurses are the healthcare professionals spending most time with patients and families at the end of life, associated policy documents stress the importance of educating nurses to equip them with the necessary knowledge and skills to provide effective care. Despite education being a consistent recommendation, the ability of education to influence nursing practice is uncertain. Methods: We undertook a systematic review of literature using Joanna Briggs Institute Methodology for Mixed Methods by searching the Medline, Embase and CINAHL databases between January 2006 and December 2018. Findings: Ten studies met the inclusion criteria, seven contained quantitative data. Six demonstrated improvements in outcome measures, but not all results were statistically significant. Most quantitative data related to self-reported measures of confidence. Six studies contained qualitative findings that were categorised into themes: confidence, practice change, skills and proactivity. Conclusion: Little research exists exploring the impact of post-registration palliative care education for nurses. Existing outcome measures do not clearly demonstrate changes to end-of-life practice. Research is suggested to establish links between self-reported confidence and improvements to practice. Evaluation of the impact on practice should be an integral component of end-of-life education initiatives.


2020 ◽  
Vol 72 (3) ◽  
pp. 1147
Author(s):  
R.J. Goodall ◽  
J. Ellauzi ◽  
M.K.H. Tan ◽  
S. Onida ◽  
A.H. Davies ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 60 (2) ◽  
pp. 282-292
Author(s):  
Richard J. Goodall ◽  
Juan Ellauzi ◽  
Matthew K.H. Tan ◽  
Sarah Onida ◽  
Alun H. Davies ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 307-316
Author(s):  
Michelle Christo ◽  
Lintang Dian Saraswati ◽  
Ari Udiyono ◽  
Dwi Sutiningsih

Background: SARS, MERS and Covid-19 are the most dangerous viruses among the Human Coronavirus (HCoV). The spreading of those diseases could cause cabin fever due to social restrictions as the control and prevention efforts. This study aims to map the impact of cabin fever during HCoV pandemic by the characteristic population and its causing factors.Methods: A mixed method systematic review was conducted in five databases and its keywords were determined using MeSH (Medical Subject Headings). All articles were assessed after passed the last process (included). There are 11 articles included and 3 of them rated as strong quality. The findings were grouped into themes related to population characteristics and causative factors.Result: The result shows among 4 themes of population characteristic, college student shows more than five symptoms of cabin fever. Out of all the causing factors, quarantine and social distancing shows more than five symptoms of cabin fever.Conclusion: This review proves that cabin fever can occurs during the outbreak, epidemics and pandemics so, psychological treatment in the communities is needed during the spreading of the viruses. The treatment must be right because the symptoms of cabin fever differ according to population and the causes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document