Scientism, conflicts of interest, and the marginalization of ethics in medical education

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 939-944 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Mayes ◽  
Jane Williams ◽  
Ian Kerridge ◽  
Wendy Lipworth
The Lancet ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 390 (10108) ◽  
pp. 2128-2130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ladan Golestaneh ◽  
Ethan Cowan

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 21-22
Author(s):  
Rushad Patell ◽  
Natalia Forbath ◽  
Laura Dodge ◽  
Brian J. Carney ◽  
Josephine Cool ◽  
...  

Background: Consistent classification of consult requests may lead to more productive, efficient, and collegial conversations about patient care, which can facilitate improved work satisfaction and an enhanced learning environment. We propose an organizing framework of 7 specific consultation types: ideal, obligatory, procedural, S.O.S., confirmatory, inappropriate, and curbside. We aimed to obtain validity evidence for this rubric to consistently classify consultation requests in an academic setting. Methods: A random sample of 100 de-identified hematology oncology consultation requests made through the online consult portal from a single academic center were selected and independently coded as 1 of the 7 consultation types by 3 hematologists and 3 hospitalists. Perfect (same consult assignment by all coders) and partial (same consult assignment by >4/6 coders) concordance was calculated. Perfect and partial (>2/3 coders) inter-rater concordance based on consult subtypes and provider specialty was also calculated. To assess if length of consult request has an impact on the classification of consult, the length of the request was compared across concordant, partially concordant, and discordant requests. Results: Of the 100 consults, perfect concordance was 57%, and partial concordance was 92% (Figure 1). Perfect concordance was 69% amongst hematologists and 78% amongst hospitalists. In cases without perfect concordance (n=43), hematologists agreed with each other 76% of the time, while hospitalists agreed with each other 81% of the time. Of the consults that at least 4 coders classified in the same way, hospitalists were more likely than hematologists to have perfect concordance for ideal consults (89% vs. 66%, respectively; P=0.001) but less likely to have perfect concordance for S.O.S consults (56% vs. 100%, respectively; P=0.003). Hematologists were twice more likely than hospitalists to classify a consult request as S.O.S (26.7% vs. 12.3%, P<0.001), while a greater proportion of hospitalists classified consults as ideal (74% vs. 61%, P=0.007). There was no significant difference in the word count of requests that were perfectly concordant (68+35), partially concordant (65+51), or discordant (39+22) (P=0.18). Conclusion: Hematology oncology consult requests can be classified into a novel rubric of 7 specific subtypes. Overall, partial concordance between primary providers and consultants was high, and perfect concordance was moderate. Hematologists were more likely to classify consult requests as S.O.S (without specific questions) than primary providers. Opportunities exist to utilize the rubric to improve communication between health care providers and to improve the medical education of trainees. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


JAMA ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 310 (22) ◽  
pp. 2397 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Korn ◽  
Daniel Carlat

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (7) ◽  
pp. 814-817 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua D. Niforatos ◽  
Lucas Lin ◽  
Jatin Narang ◽  
Anthony James ◽  
Andrew Singletary ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. E529-E538

BACKGROUND: Overprescription of opioids has fueled an epidemic of addiction and overdose deaths. The FDA required manufacturers of extended-release/long-acting (ER/LA) opioids to fund continuing medical education (CME) on opioids as part of a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS). OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine whether industry-funded REMS on long-acting opioids were consistent with the FDA’s goal to reduce serious, adverse outcomes resulting from inappropriate prescribing, misuse, and abuse. STUDY DESIGN: In 2018, we analyzed all internet-based REMS CME activities funded by the REMS Program Companies (RPC), a consortium of ER/LA opioid manufacturers. METHODS: We utilized systematic narrative thematic analysis, an inductive approach that allows for mapping of concepts and meanings across a body of data by identifying, recording, analyzing, and refining key narrative points, called “themes”. Authors viewed all REMS activities multiple times. RESULTS: Ten themes were identified, all of which were at least somewhat incongruent with federal guidelines and their goals: 1. Chronic pain is a common, under-treated problem. 2. Chronic pain is a chronic disease. 3. Opioids are an appropriate treatment for chronic pain. 4. ER/LAs are more appropriate than immediate-release (IR) opioids for chronic pain. 5. Tolerance is normal, expected, and beneficial. 6. “Opioid rotation” can maximize analgesia and minimize adverse effects. 7. There is no population for whom opioids are absolutely contraindicated or inappropriate. 8. Screening and monitoring tools are effective for preventing opioid-related problems. 9. Opioid related adverse effects, such as respiratory depression and addiction, are due only to misuse and abuse. 10. Addiction, overdose, and death are due to street drugs such as heroin and fentanyl, not prescription opioids. Themes and statements repeated in these activities were inconsistent with current medical knowledge, evidence-based federal guidelines, and FDA goals. LIMITATIONS: We evaluated only online, not live, CME. We also did not evaluate individual conflicts of interest of faculty. CONCLUSIONS: Industry-funded REMS-compliant CME on opioids contain messages that misrepresent scientific evidence and may foster overprescribing of opioids. KEY WORDS: Opioids, REMS, continuing medical education, pharmaceutical industry, marketing messages, prescribing behavior, chronic pain, addiction


2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (05) ◽  
pp. 589-598 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathaniel Robbins

AbstractA conflict of interest (COI) exists when a physician's professional responsibilities are compromised by personal or financial relationships. COIs between physicians and the pharmaceutical or medical device industry (Industry) are common. Collaborations with Industry have many potential benefits, but also raise potential ethical pitfalls. Industry-related COIs have widespread influence on medical education, research, and clinical practice, and therefore have profound implications for the integrity of the field of medicine. Full disclosure is an important step toward mitigating COI but does not redress subconscious accompanying biases. I review the spectrum of potential COI faced by physicians, with a focus on the ethics surrounding the relationship between neurologists and Industry. Other financial and nonfinancial COIs that influence neurologists and nonindividual entities, such as academic institutions, medical journals, and professional societies, are also discussed. Solutions ranging from disclosure to avoidance and recusal are briefly considered.


2020 ◽  
pp. 258-282
Author(s):  
Rosamond Rhodes

This book argues that medical ethics involves a commitment to the profession’s distinctive duties and the development of a doctorly character. To exemplify professionalism, doctors need to develop inclinations to fulfill their professional obligations, and they need to be aware that various unconscious elements influence decisions, the kinds of factors that we identify as biases, prejudices, conflicts of interest, and the like. Character development is a defense against these unwanted invisible inducements that can influence choices. The chapter discusses the importance of nurturing the virtues that comprise a doctorly character and dispose physicians to fulfill their professional responsibilities. In addition to cultivating the attitudes that incline doctors to meet their previously enumerated specific duties, this chapter discusses how professionalism involves appropriate attitudes about courage, bodily pleasures, money, honor, anger, social interaction, and caring. The chapter also explains how these concerns should be reflected in medical institutions and medical education.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralitsa Akins

There is a paucity of publications about new regional medical campuses. The authors, members of the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) and its Group on Regional Medical Campuses (GRMC), offer a historical perspective about the role of Regional Medical Campuses (RMCs), and provide a roadmap to establishing a new RMC, including logistics, resources, curriculum, student services, faculty, affiliations and networking within the community. A checklist designed to support leadership decision-making is also included. The RMC is an efficient model for increasing opportunities for clinical training, accommodating expansion of graduate medical education, and offering a cost-effective solution to train future physicians. Conflicts of Interest: None


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document