scholarly journals Toward a neurobehavioral trait conceptualization of depression proneness

2019 ◽  
Vol 56 (7) ◽  
pp. e13367 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colin B. Bowyer ◽  
Keanan J. Joyner ◽  
James R. Yancey ◽  
Noah C. Venables ◽  
Greg Hajcak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danai Riga ◽  
Leanne JM Schmitz ◽  
Yvar van Mourik ◽  
Witte JG Hoogendijk ◽  
Taco J De Vries ◽  
...  

AbstractMajor depression and alcohol-related disorders frequently co-occur. Depression severity weighs on the magnitude and persistence of comorbid alcohol use disorder (AUD), with severe implications for disease prognosis. Here, we investigated whether depression vulnerability drives propensity to AUD at the preclinical level. We used the social defeat-induced persistent stress (SDPS) model of chronic depression in combination with operant alcohol self-administration (SA). Male Wistar rats were subjected to social defeat (5 episodes) and prolonged social isolation (~12 weeks) and subsequently classified as SDPS-prone or SDPS-resilient based on their affective and cognitive performance. Using an operant alcohol SA paradigm, acquisition, motivation, extinction and cue-induced reinstatement of alcohol-seeking were examined in the two subpopulations. SDPS-prone animals showed increased alcohol SA, excessive motivation to acquire alcohol, persistent alcohol-seeking despite alcohol unavailability, extinction resistance and increased cue-induced relapse; the latter could be blocked by the α2 adrenoreceptor agonist guanfacine. In SDPS-resilient rats, prior exposure to social defeat increased alcohol SA without affecting any other measures of alcohol-seeking and -taking. Our data revealed that depression proneness confers vulnerability to alcohol, emulating patterns of alcohol dependence seen in human addicts, and that depression resilience to a large extent protects from the development of AUD-like phenotypes. Furthermore, our data suggest that stress exposure alone, independently of depressive symptoms, alters alcohol intake in the long-term.


1990 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 255-263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Zemore ◽  
Donald G. Fischer ◽  
Laura S. Garratt ◽  
Colleen Miller

1983 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 211-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Zemore

Two retrospective self-report measures of depression-proneness were constructed and their psychometric properties investigated. A sample of 75 female students, selected to provide a wide range of depression-proneness scores, completed the two depression-proneness self-reports along with a measure of current severity of depression. A second session (retest) was conducted 4 mo. later. Subjects were then rated for degree of depression-proneness by two or more close friends and family members. Test-retest and coefficient alpha estimates of reliability were sufficiently high to recommend both depression-proneness measures as research instruments. Both self-report measures correlated significantly; rs = .38 and .41 with friends' and families' ratings of depression-proneness, which provides evidence for the validity of the depression-proneness measures. Little or no evidence was found for the discriminant validity of these measures. The advantages of retrospective self-reports over alternative approaches for identifying depression-prone individuals are discussed.


2004 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 1155-1170 ◽  
Author(s):  
David R Strong ◽  
Richard A Brown ◽  
Christopher W Kahler ◽  
Elizabeth E Lloyd-Richardson ◽  
Raymond Niaura

2006 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 223-231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frances P. Thorndike ◽  
Rachel Wernicke ◽  
Michelle Y. Pearlman ◽  
David A.F. Haaga

1987 ◽  
Vol 61 (3) ◽  
pp. 863-866
Author(s):  
Sung-Mook Hong

The Zemore Depression-Proneness Rating Scale was administered to 208 university students. A principal components analysis with varimax rotation identified three factors representing Negative Self-attitude, Performance Difficulty, and Lack of Appetite. Some similarity between the present factors and those of the Beck Depression Inventory was discussed. Because the scale overemphasizes cognitive components, attention to items on the somatic aspects of depression was suggested. However, it should be noted that depression-proneness appears to be the feature of Zemore's scale that sets it apart from other depression scales.


1988 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 122-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sung-Mook Hong ◽  
Jennifer Mayo
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document