scholarly journals P16‐79: The tolerability and efficacy of long‐term nintedanib treatment for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in the real‐world

Respirology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (S3) ◽  
pp. 482-482
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (12) ◽  
pp. 262-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masayuki Nakamura ◽  
Masaki Okamoto ◽  
Kiminori Fujimoto ◽  
Tomohiro Ebata ◽  
Masaki Tominaga ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (12) ◽  
pp. e0261684
Author(s):  
Eung Gu Lee ◽  
Tae-Hee Lee ◽  
Yujin Hong ◽  
Jiwon Ryoo ◽  
Jung Won Heo ◽  
...  

Background Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic, progressive fibrosing interstitial pneumonia of unknown etiology. In several randomized clinical trials, and in the clinical practice, pirfenidone is used to effectively and safely treat IPF. However, sometimes it is difficult to use the dose of pirfenidone used in clinical trials. This study evaluated the effects of low-dose pirfenidone on IPF disease progression and patient survival in the real-world. Methods This retrospective, observational study enrolled IPF patients seen at the time of diagnosis at a single center from 2008 to 2018. Longitudinal clinical and laboratory data were prospectively collected. We compared the clinical characteristics, survival, and pulmonary function decline between patients treated and untreated with various dose of pirfenidone. Results Of 295 IPF patients, 100 (33.9%) received pirfenidone and 195 (66.1%) received no antifibrotic agent. Of the 100 patients who received pirfenidone, 24 (24%), 50 (50%), and 26 (26%), respectively, were given 600, 1200, and 1800 mg pirfenidone daily. The mean survival time was 57.03 ± 3.90 months in the no-antifibrotic drug group and 73.26 ± 7.87 months in the pirfenidone-treated group (p = 0.027). In the unadjusted analysis, the survival of the patients given pirfenidone was significantly better (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.69, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.48–0.99, p = 0.04). After adjusting for age, gender, body mass index, and the GAP score [based on gender (G), age (A), and two physiological lung parameters (P)], survival remained better in the patients given pirfenidone (HR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.37–0.85, p = 0.006). In terms of pulmonary function, the decreases in forced vital capacity (%), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (%) and the diffusing capacity of lung for carbon monoxide (%) were significantly smaller (p = 0.000, p = 0.001, and p = 0.007, respectively) in patients given pirfenidone. Conclusions Low-dose pirfenidone provided beneficial effects on survival and pulmonary function decline in the real-world practice.


2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (135) ◽  
pp. 58-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincent Cottin ◽  
Toby Maher

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic, irreversible, progressively destructive lung disease that culminates in respiratory failure and death. Randomised controlled trials have demonstrated that treatment of IPF patients with pirfenidone reduces lung function decline, improves progression-free survival and significantly reduces the risk of all-cause mortality at 1 year. Pirfenidone has been shown to have a favourable safety profile and was generally well tolerated over the long term in clinical trials and real-world experience. However, side-effect management is critical to help some patients remain on treatment over the long term. The primary treatment-related adverse events associated with pirfenidone therapy are gastrointestinal upset, rash and photosensitivity. Gastrointestinal events may be mitigated by ensuring that pirfenidone is taken with food, while skin symptoms may be reduced by avoiding sun exposure and frequent use of sunblock. Educating patients about the potential for these adverse events to occur and providing instructions prior to treatment to avoid adverse drug reactions are an important means of ensuring patients may derive the important benefits provided by long-term treatment with pirfenidone.


CHEST Journal ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 152 (4) ◽  
pp. A451
Author(s):  
Victoria Gamerman ◽  
Margaret Salisbury ◽  
Daniel Culver ◽  
Thomas Leonard ◽  
Megan Neely ◽  
...  

Respiration ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 94 (5) ◽  
pp. 405-407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Argyris Tzouvelekis ◽  
Evangelos Bouros ◽  
Vasilios Tzilas ◽  
Demosthenes Bouros

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document