Interdisciplinary scientific research evaluation and bottom-up medical innovation

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claude Andr� Jean
Keyword(s):  
Research Evaluation ◽  
Scientific Research ◽  
Medical Innovation ◽  
Bottom Up

Scientometric Indicators and Assumptions

2019 ◽  
pp. 167-176
Keyword(s):  
Research Evaluation ◽  
Scientific Research ◽  
Scientometric Indicators ◽  
Research Activities ◽  
Broad Overview

To better understand all the aspects and components of scientific research activities, this book explores and discusses the research indicators applied for research evaluation and their categorization. The present chapter provides a broad overview of what this book comprises and its main assumptions.

Reply to the letter on Ancaiani et al. ‘Evaluating Scientific research in Italy: The 2004–10 research evaluation exercise’

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 358-360 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergio Benedetto ◽  
Tindaro Cicero ◽  
Marco Malgarini ◽  
Carmen Nappi
Keyword(s):  
Research Evaluation ◽  
Scientific Research ◽  
Evaluation Exercise

Evolution of Literature on Scientometric Indicators

2019 ◽  
pp. 39-55
Keyword(s):  
Research Productivity ◽  
Research Evaluation ◽  
Research Output ◽  
Scientific Research ◽  
Scientific Publications ◽  
Scientometric Indicators ◽  
Scientific Research Output ◽  
Measurement And Evaluation ◽  
Rational Evaluation

An unbiased and reasonable research evaluation should reflect the diversity and impact of research productivity. The evaluation of scientific research is essential to determine its achievement, reputation, growth, and progress of an individual or an institution. In this context, production and quality of scholarly content offer a strong foundation for its rational evaluation. The citations along with the number of scientific publications are predominantly used to evaluate research content. The use of scientometric indicators is of great use in the measurement and evaluation of the scientific research output, but at the same instant, it requires a great carefulness in use.

scholarly journals Problems and Suggestions for the Scientific Research Management System of Universities

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 31-35
Author(s):  
Liang Zhao
Keyword(s):  
Management System ◽  
Evaluation System ◽  
Research Evaluation ◽  
Science And Technology ◽  
Innovation System ◽  
Scientific Research ◽  
Research Management ◽  
New Era ◽  
Data Intensive ◽  
Research Evaluation System

The revolution of science and technology in the new era is rising. New industries, formats, and models led by information technology are emerging. Scientific research has entered the fourth data-intensive paradigm. As an important part of the science and technology innovation system, universities also have new requirements for their scientific research management system. In this article, it is suggested that the efficiency and quality of scientific research management in universities could be enhanced by reconstructing the organizational structure of scientific research management, improve the service capabilities of scientific research managers, perfecting the scientific research evaluation system, and innovating the management model of cross-research teams.

Efficiency – Model for Scientific Research Evaluation

2013 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 141-159
Author(s):  
Panaite NICA ◽  
◽  
Silviu Mihail TITA ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Research Evaluation ◽  
Scientific Research
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document