The Effect of Real Turbine Roughness With Pressure Gradient on Heat Transfer

2004 ◽  
Vol 126 (3) ◽  
pp. 385-394 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey P. Bons ◽  
Stephen T. McClain
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Adverse Pressure Gradient ◽  
Combined Effects ◽  
Pressure Gradients ◽  
Smooth Wall ◽  
Reynolds Analogy ◽  
Integral Boundary ◽  
Favorable Pressure Gradient

Experimental measurements of heat transfer (St) are reported for low speed flow over scaled turbine roughness models at three different freestream pressure gradients: adverse, zero (nominally), and favorable. The roughness models were scaled from surface measurements taken on actual, in-service land-based turbine hardware and include samples of fuel deposits, TBC spallation, erosion, and pitting as well as a smooth control surface. All St measurements were made in a developing turbulent boundary layer at the same value of Reynolds number Rex≅900,000. An integral boundary layer method used to estimate cf for the smooth wall cases allowed the calculation of the Reynolds analogy 2St/cf. Results indicate that for a smooth wall, Reynolds analogy varies appreciably with pressure gradient. Smooth surface heat transfer is considerably less sensitive to pressure gradients than skin friction. For the rough surfaces with adverse pressure gradient, St is less sensitive to roughness than with zero or favorable pressure gradient. Roughness-induced Stanton number increases at zero pressure gradient range from 16–44% (depending on roughness type), while increases with adverse pressure gradient are 7% less on average for the same roughness type. Hot-wire measurements show a corresponding drop in roughness-induced momentum deficit and streamwise turbulent kinetic energy generation in the adverse pressure gradient boundary layer compared with the other pressure gradient conditions. The combined effects of roughness and pressure gradient are different than their individual effects added together. Specifically, for adverse pressure gradient the combined effect on heat transfer is 9% less than that estimated by adding their separate effects. For favorable pressure gradient, the additive estimate is 6% lower than the result with combined effects. Identical measurements on a “simulated” roughness surface composed of cones in an ordered array show a behavior unlike that of the scaled “real” roughness models. St calculations made using a discrete-element roughness model show promising agreement with the experimental data. Predictions and data combine to underline the importance of accounting for pressure gradient and surface roughness effects simultaneously rather than independently for accurate performance calculations in turbines.

The Effect of Real Turbine Roughness With Pressure Gradient on Heat Transfer

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey P. Bons ◽  
Stephen T. McClain
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Adverse Pressure Gradient ◽  
Combined Effects ◽  
Pressure Gradients ◽  
Smooth Wall ◽  
Reynolds Analogy ◽  
Integral Boundary ◽  
Favorable Pressure Gradient

Experimental measurements of heat transfer (St) are reported for low speed flow over scaled turbine roughness models at three different freestream pressure gradients: adverse, zero (nominally), and favorable. The roughness models were scaled from surface measurements taken on actual, in-service land-based turbine hardware and include samples of fuel deposits, TBC spallation, erosion, and pitting as well as a smooth control surface. All St measurements were made in a developing turbulent boundary layer at the same value of Reynolds number (Rex≅900,000). An integral boundary layer method used to estimate cf for the smooth wall cases allowed the calculation of the Reynolds analogy (2St/cf). Results indicate that for a smooth wall, Reynolds analogy varies appreciably with pressure gradient. Smooth surface heat transfer is considerably less sensitive to pressure gradients than skin friction. For the rough surfaces with adverse pressure gradient, St is less sensitive to roughness than with zero or favorable pressure gradient. Roughness-induced Stanton number increases at zero pressure gradient range from 16–44% (depending on roughness type), while increases with adverse pressure gradient are 7% less on average for the same roughness type. Hot-wire measurements show a corresponding drop in roughness-induced momentum deficit and streamwise turbulent kinetic energy generation in the adverse pressure gradient boundary layer compared with the other pressure gradient conditions. The combined effects of roughness and pressure gradient are different than their individual effects added together. Specifically, for adverse pressure gradient the combined effect on heat transfer is 9% less than that estimated by adding their separate effects. For favorable pressure gradient, the additive estimate is 6% lower than the result with combined effects. Identical measurements on a “simulated” roughness surface composed of cones in an ordered array show a behavior unlike that of the scaled “real” roughness models. St calculations made using a discrete-element roughness model show promising agreement with the experimental data. Predictions and data combine to underline the importance of accounting for pressure gradient and surface roughness effects simultaneously rather than independently for accurate performance calculations in turbines.

Effects of the Condition of the Approach Boundary Layer and of Mainstream Pressure Gradients on the Heat Transfer Coefficient on Film-Cooled Surfaces

1985 ◽  
Vol 107 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Hay ◽  
D. Lampard ◽  
C. L. Saluja
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Mass Transfer ◽  
Heat Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Adverse Pressure Gradient ◽  
Pressure Gradients ◽  
Favorable Pressure Gradient ◽  
The Heat Transfer Coefficient

This paper describes an investigation of the sensitivity of the heat transfer coefficient under the film to the state of the approach boundary layer for injection through a row of holes on a flat plate. The investigation is done for a range of blowing parameters using a heat-mass transfer analogy. Injection angles of 35 deg and 90 deg are covered. Additionally, for the same injection geometries, the effect of injection in the presence of mild adverse, mild favorable, and strong favorable mainstream pressure gradients is investigated. The results indicate that the heat transfer coefficient under the film is sensitive neither to the condition of the approach boundary layer nor to the presence of a mild adverse pressure gradient, but it is significantly lowered by a favorable pressure gradient, particularly at low blowing parameters.

The Effects of Adverse Pressure Gradients on Momentum and Thermal Structures in Transitional Boundary Layers: Part 1 — Mean Quantities

1995 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott P. Mislevy ◽  
Ting Wang
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Temperature Profile ◽  
Adverse Pressure Gradient ◽  
Surface Heat ◽  
Pressure Gradients ◽  
Surface Heat Transfer ◽  
Mean Temperature ◽  
The Mean

The effects of adverse pressure gradients on the thermal and momentum characteristics of a heated transitional boundary layer were investigated with free-stream turbulence ranging from 0.3 to 0.6%. The acceleration parameter, K=vU¯∞2dU¯∞dx, was kept constant along the test section. Both surface heat transfer and boundary layer measurements were conducted. The boundary layer measurements were conducted with a three-wire probe (two velocity wires and one temperature wire) for two representative cases, K1=−0.51 × 10−6 and K2=−1.05 × 10−6. The surface heat transfer measurements were conducted for K values ranging from −0.045 × 10−6 to −1.44 × 10−6 over five divergent wall angles. The Stanton numbers of the cases with adverse pressure gradients were greater than that of the zero-pressure-gradient turbulent correlation in the low-Reynolds number turbulent flow, and the difference increased as the adverse pressure gradient was increased. The adverse pressure gradient caused earlier transition onset and shorter transition length based on Rex, Reδ*, and Reθ in comparison to zero-pressure-gradient conditions. As expected, there was a reduction in skin friction as the adverse pressure gradient increased. In the U+-Y+ coordinates, the adverse pressure gradients had a significant effect on the mean velocity profiles in the near-wall region for the late-laminar and early transition stations. The mean temperature profile was observed to precede the velocity profile in starting and ending the transition process, opposite to what occurred in favorable pressure gradient cases in previous studies. A curve fit of the turbulent temperature profile in the log-linear region for the K2 case gave a conduction layer thickness of Y+=9.8 and an average Prt=0.71. In addition, the wake region of the turbulent mean temperature profile was significantly suppressed.

The Effects of Adverse Pressure Gradients on Momentum and Thermal Structures in Transitional Boundary Layers: Part 1—Mean Quantities

1996 ◽  
Vol 118 (4) ◽  
pp. 717-727 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. P. Mislevy ◽  
T. Wang
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Temperature Profile ◽  
Adverse Pressure Gradient ◽  
Surface Heat ◽  
Pressure Gradients ◽  
Surface Heat Transfer ◽  
Mean Temperature ◽  
The Mean

The effects of adverse pressure gradients on the thermal and momentum characteristics of a heated transitional boundary layer were investigated with free-stream turbulence ranging from 0.3 to 0.6 percent. The acceleration parameter, K, was kept constant along the test section. Both surface heat transfer and boundary layer measurements were conducted. The boundary layer measurements were conducted with a three-wire probe (two velocity wires and one temperature wire) for two representative cases, K1 = −0.51 × 10−6 and K2 = −1.05 × 10−6. The surface heat transfer measurements were conducted for K values ranging from −0.045 × 10−6 to −1.44 × 10−6 over five divergent wall angles. The Stanton numbers of the cases with adverse pressure gradients were greater than that of the zero-pressure-gradient turbulent correlation in the low-Reynolds-number turbulent flow, and the difference increased as the adverse pressure gradient was increased. The adverse pressure gradient caused earlier transition onset and shorter transition length based on Rex, Reδ*, and Reθ in comparison to zero-pressure-gradient conditions. As expected, there was a reduction in skin friction as the adverse pressure gradient increased. In the U+−Y+ coordinates, the adverse pressure gradients had a significant effect on the mean velocity profiles in the near-wall region for the late-laminar and early transition stations. The mean temperature profile was observed to precede the velocity profile in starting and ending the transition process, opposite to what occurred in favorable pressure gradient cases in previous studies. A curve fit of the turbulent temperature profile in the log-linear region for the K2 case gave a conduction layer thickness of Y+ = 9.8 and an average Prt = 0.71. In addition, the wake region of the turbulent mean temperature profile was significantly suppressed.

Predicting Turbulent Boundary Layer Wall Pressure Fluctuations in Adverse Pressure Gradients

2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank J. Aldrich
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layer ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Pressure Fluctuations ◽  
Adverse Pressure Gradient ◽  
Wall Pressure ◽  
Prediction Tool ◽  
Pressure Gradients ◽  
Wall Pressure Fluctuations ◽  
The Difference

A physics-based approach is employed and a new prediction tool is developed to predict the wavevector-frequency spectrum of the turbulent boundary layer wall pressure fluctuations for subsonic airfoils under the influence of adverse pressure gradients. The prediction tool uses an explicit relationship developed by D. M. Chase, which is based on a fit to zero pressure gradient data. The tool takes into account the boundary layer edge velocity distribution and geometry of the airfoil, including the blade chord and thickness. Comparison to experimental adverse pressure gradient data shows a need for an update to the modeling constants of the Chase model. To optimize the correlation between the predicted turbulent boundary layer wall pressure spectrum and the experimental data, an optimization code (iSIGHT) is employed. This optimization module is used to minimize the absolute value of the difference (in dB) between the predicted values and those measured across the analysis frequency range. An optimized set of modeling constants is derived that provides reasonable agreement with the measurements.

On the Momentum and Thermal Structures of Turbulent Spots in a Favorable Pressure Gradient

2005 ◽  
Vol 128 (4) ◽  
pp. 689-698 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. P. Chong ◽  
S. Zhong
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Velocity Component ◽  
Thermal Boundary Layer ◽  
Temperature Fluctuations ◽  
Turbulent Spots ◽  
Zone Length ◽  
Favorable Pressure Gradient ◽  
The Difference

This paper represents the results from an experimental investigation of the flow physics behind the difference in the transition zone length indicated by the momentum boundary layer and thermal boundary layer parameters observed on the suction surfaces of gas turbine blades. The experiments were carried out on turbulent spots created artificially in an otherwise laminar boundary layer developing over a heated flat plate in a zero pressure gradient and a favorable pressure gradient. A specially designed miniature triple wire probe was used to measure the streamwise velocity component U, transverse velocity component V and temperature T simultaneously during the passage of the spots. In this paper, the general characteristics of the ensemble-averaged velocity and temperature perturbations, rms fluctuations, and the second moment turbulent quantities are discussed and the influence of favorable pressure gradient on these parameters is examined. When a favorable pressure gradient is present, unlike in the velocity boundary layer where significant velocity fluctuations and Reynolds shear stress occur both on the plane of symmetry and the spanwise periphery, high temperature fluctuations (and turbulent heat fluxes) are confined in the plane of symmetry. The difference in the levels of velocity/temperature fluctuations at these two locations gives an indication of the effectiveness of momentum/heat transfer across the span of the spots. The results of this study indicate that the heat transfer within a spot is inhibited more than that of the momentum transfer at the presence of a favorable pressure gradient. This phenomenon is expected to slow down the development of a transitional thermal boundary layer, leading to a longer transitional zone length indicated by the heat transfer parameters as reported in the literature.

PIV Study of Adverse and Favorable Pressure Gradient Turbulent Flows Over Transverse Ribs

2008 ◽  
Vol 130 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Agelinchaab ◽  
M. F. Tachie
Keyword(s):  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Turbulent Flows ◽  
Reynolds Shear Stress ◽  
Adverse Pressure Gradient ◽  
Bottom Wall ◽  
Combined Effects ◽  
Mean Flow ◽  
Turbulent Statistics ◽  
Favorable Pressure Gradient ◽  
The Mean

This paper reports an experimental study of the combined effects of rib roughness and pressure gradient on turbulent flows produced in asymmetric converging and diverging channels. Transverse square ribs with pitch-to-height ratio of 4 were attached to the bottom wall of the channel to produce the rib roughness. A particle image velocimetry technique was used to conduct measurements at several streamwise-transverse planes located upstream, within, and downstream of the converging and diverging sections of the channel. From these measurements, the mean velocities and turbulent statistics at the top plane of the ribs and across the channel were obtained. The data revealed non-negligible wall-normal motion and interaction between the cavities and overlying boundary layers. The different drag characteristics of the rough bottom wall and the smooth top wall produced asymmetric distributions of mean velocity and turbulent statistics across the channel. The asymmetry of these profiles is most extreme in the presence of adverse pressure gradient. Because of the manner in which pressure gradient modifies the mean flow and turbulence production, it was found that the streamwise turbulence intensity and Reynolds shear stress in the vicinity of the ribs are lower in the adverse pressure gradient than in the favorable pressure gradient channel. The results show also that the combined effects of rib roughness and adverse pressure gradient on the turbulent intensity statistics are significantly higher than when roughness and adverse pressure gradient are applied in isolation.

A Critical Assessment of Reynolds Analogy for Turbine Flows

2005 ◽  
Vol 127 (5) ◽  
pp. 472-485 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Bons
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Skin Friction ◽  
Adverse Pressure Gradient ◽  
Design Parameters ◽  
Freestream Turbulence ◽  
Reynolds Analogy ◽  
Pressure Drag

The application of Reynolds analogy 2St/cf≅1 for turbine flows is critically evaluated using experimental data collected in a low-speed wind tunnel. Independent measurements of St and cf over a wide variety of test conditions permit assessments of the variation of the Reynolds analogy factor (i.e., 2St/cf) with Reynolds number, freestream pressure gradient, surface roughness, and freestream turbulence. While the factor is fairly independent of Reynolds number, it increases with positive (adverse) pressure gradient and decreases with negative (favorable) pressure gradient. This variation can be traced directly to the governing equations for momentum and energy which dictate a more direct influence of pressure gradient on wall shear than on energy (heat) transfer. Surface roughness introduces a large pressure drag component to the net skin friction measurement without a corresponding mechanism for a comparable increase in heat transfer. Accordingly, the Reynolds analogy factor decreases dramatically with surface roughness (by as much as 50% as roughness elements become more prominent). Freestream turbulence has the opposite effect of increasing heat transfer more than skin friction, thus the Reynolds analogy factor increases with turbulence level (by up to 35% at a level of 11% freestream turbulence). Physical mechanisms responsible for the observed variations are offered in each case. Finally, synergies resulting from the combinations of pressure gradient and freestream turbulence with surface roughness are evaluated. With this added insight, the Reynolds analogy remains a useful tool for qualitative assessments of complex turbine flows where both heat load management and aerodynamic efficiency are critical design parameters.

Turbulent boundary layers in decreasing adverse pressure gradients

1966 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 481-506 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. E. Perry
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Adverse Pressure Gradient ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layers ◽  
Pressure Gradients ◽  
Streamwise Direction ◽  
Mean Velocity ◽  
Boundary Layer Development ◽  
Regional Similarity ◽  
Layer Development

The results of a detailed mean velocity survey of a smooth-wall turbulent boundary layer in an adverse pressure gradient are described. Close to the wall, a variety of profiles shapes were observed. Progressing in the streamwise direction, logarithmic, ½-power, linear and$\frac{3}{2}$-power distributions seemed to form, and generally each predominated at a different stage of the boundary-layer development. It is believed that the phenomenon occurred because of the nature of the pressure gradient imposed (an initially high gradient which fell to low values as the boundary layer developed) and attempts are made to describe the flow by an extension of the regional similarity hypothesis proposed by Perry, Bell & Joubert (1966). Data from other sources is limited but comparisons with the author's results are encouraging.

Separated Turbulent Boundary Layer Under Unsteady Adverse Pressure Gradients: DNS and RANS

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junshin Park
Keyword(s):  
Numerical Simulation ◽  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Eddy Viscosity ◽  
Adverse Pressure Gradient ◽  
Velocity Profiles ◽  
Navier Stokes ◽  
Pressure Gradients ◽  
Recirculation Bubble ◽  
Rans Models

Predicitve capabilities of Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) techniques have been assessed using SST k–ω model and Spalart-Allmaras model by comparing its results with direct numerical simulation (DNS) results. It has been shown that Spalart-Allmaras and SST k–ω model predict an earlier separation point and a bigger recirculation bubble as compared to the DNS result. Velocity profiles predicted by RANS for both models closely match with DNS results for the steady adverse pressure gradient case. However, the RANS fail to predict correct velocity profiles for unsteady adverse pressure gradients not only for inside the bubble but also after the reattachment zone. To provide the backgrounds for improving RANS models, these differences are explained with Reynolds stress and eddy viscosity which differ between the steady and unsteady adverse pressure gradient RANS cases.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document