Gas Turbine Combined Cycle Optimized for Postcombustion Carbon Capture

Author(s):  
S. Can Gülen ◽  
Chris Hall

This paper describes a gas turbine combined cycle (GTCC) power plant system, which addresses the three key design challenges of postcombustion CO2 capture from the stack gas of a GTCC power plant using aqueous amine-based scrubbing method by offering the following: (i) low heat recovery steam generator (HRSG) stack gas temperature, (ii) increased HRSG stack gas CO2 content, and (iii) decreased HRSG stack gas O2 content. This is achieved by combining two bottoming cycle modifications in an inventive manner, i.e., (i) high supplementary (duct) firing in the HRSG and (ii) recirculation of the HRSG stack gas. It is shown that, compared to an existing natural gas-fired GTCC power plant with postcombustion capture, it is possible to reduce the CO2 capture penalty—power diverted away from generation—by almost 65% and the overall capital cost ($/kW) by about 35%.

Author(s):  
S. Can Gülen ◽  
Chris Hall

This paper describes a gas turbine combined cycle (GTCC) power plant system, which addresses the three key design challenges of post-combustion CO2 capture from the stack gas of a GTCC power plant using aqueous amine-based scrubbing method by offering the following: (i) low heat recovery steam generator (HRSG) stack gas temperature, (ii) increased HRSG stack gas CO2 content and (iii) decreased HRSG stack gas O2 content. This is achieved by combining two bottoming cycle modifications in an inventive manner, i.e., (i) high supplementary (duct) firing in the HRSG and (ii) recirculation of the HRSG stack gas. It is shown that, compared to an existing natural gas-fired GTCC power plant with post-combustion capture, it is possible to reduce the CO2 capture penalty — power diverted away from generation — by almost 65 percent and the overall capital cost ($/kW) by about 35 percent.


2007 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 143-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kumar Ravi ◽  
Krishna Rama ◽  
Rama Sita

Combined cycle power plants play an important role in the present energy sector. The main challenge in designing a combined cycle power plant is proper utilization of gas turbine exhaust heat in the steam cycle in order to achieve optimum steam turbine output. Most of the combined cycle developers focused on the gas turbine output and neglected the role of the heat recovery steam generator which strongly affects the overall performance of the combined cycle power plant. The present paper is aimed at optimal utilization of the flue gas recovery heat with different heat recovery steam generator configurations of single pressure and dual pressure. The combined cycle efficiency with different heat recovery steam generator configurations have been analyzed parametrically by using first law and second law of thermodynamics. It is observed that in the dual cycle high pressure steam turbine pressure must be high and low pressure steam turbine pressure must be low for better heat recovery from heat recovery steam generator.


Author(s):  
A. I. Zwebek ◽  
P. Pilidis

This paper investigates the possibility of applying a new technique called Gas/Steam Path Analysis (GSPA), that is based on the principles of Gas Path Analysis (GPA), to gas as well as steam turbine plants (as one unit) that are main parts of a combined cycle power plant by way of simulation. In order to facilitate this investigation two pieces of software were developed at Cranfield University. With this technique, it was possible to monitor the major components of the combined cycle, and hence predict the faults that may occur within the cycle beforehand. Faults looked at were, fouling and erosion of gas and steam turbine units, heat recovery steam generator degradation (scaling and/or ashe deposition), and condenser degradation. The obtained results from GSPA calculations of the cases investigated showed that “GSPA” technique can be equally applied to either gas turbine cycle, steam turbine cycle, or to the combination of the two in a form of combined cycle. The procedure, assumptions made, and the results obtained are presented and discussed herein.


2003 ◽  
Vol 125 (3) ◽  
pp. 658-663 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Zwebek ◽  
P. Pilidis

This is the second paper exploring the effects of the degradation of different components on combined cycle gas turbine (CCGT) plant performance. This paper investigates the effects of degraded steam path components of steam turbine (bottoming) cycle have on CCGT power plant performance. Areas looked at were, steam turbine fouling, steam turbine erosion, heat recovery steam generator degradation (scaling and/or ashes deposition), and condenser degradation. The effect of gas turbine back-pressure on plant performance due to HRSG degradation is also discussed. A general simulation FORTRAN code was developed for the purpose of this study. This program can calculate the CCGT plant design point performance, off-design plant performance, and plant deterioration performance. The results obtained are presented in a graphical form and discussed.


Author(s):  
A. Zwebek ◽  
P. Pilidis

This is the second paper exploring the effects of the degradation of different components on Combined Cycle Gas Turbine (CCGT) plant performance. This paper investigates the effects of degraded steam path components of steam turbine (bottoming) cycle have on CCGT power plant performance. Areas looked at were, steam turbine fouling, steam turbine erosion, heat recovery steam generator degradation (scaling and/or ashes deposition), and condenser degradation. The effect of gas turbine back-pressure on plant performance due to HRSG degradation is also discussed. A general simulation Fortran code was developed for the purpose of this study. This program can calculate the CCGT plant design point performance, off-design plant performance, and plant deterioration performance. The results obtained are presented in a graphical form and discussed.


Author(s):  
Yongjun Zhao ◽  
Hongmei Chen ◽  
Mark Waters ◽  
Dimitri N. Mavris

The combined cycle power plant is made up of three major systems, the gas turbine engine, the heat recovery steam generator and the steam turbine. Of the major systems the gas turbine engine is a fixed design offered by a manufacturer, and the steam turbine is also a fairly standard design available from a manufacturer, but it may be somewhat customized for the project. In contrast, the heat recovery steam generator (HRSG) offers many different design options, and its design is highly customized and integrated with the steam turbine. The objective of this project is to parametrically investigate the design and cost of the HRSG system, and to demonstrate the impact on the overall cost of electricity (COE) of a combined cycle power plant. There are numerous design parameters that can affect the size and complexity of the HRSG, and it is the plan for the project to identify all the important parameters and to evaluate each. For this study, the design parameter chosen for evaluation is the exhaust gas pressure drop across the HRSG. This parameter affects the performance of both the gas turbine and steam turbine and the size of the heat recovery unit. Single-pressure, two-pressure and three-pressure HRSGs are all investigated, with the tradeoffs between design point size, performance and cost evaluated for each system. A genetic algorithm is used in the design optimization process to minimize the investment cost of the HSRG. Several system level metrics are employed to evaluate a design. They are gas turbine net power, steam turbine net power, fuel consumption of the power plant, net cycle efficiency of the power plant, HRSG investment cost, total investment cost of the power plant and the operating cost measured by the cost of electricity (COE). The impacts of HRSG exhaust gas pressure drop and system complexity on these system level metrics are investigated.


2017 ◽  
Vol 79 (7-3) ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Ganjehkaviri ◽  
Mustafa Yusof ◽  
M. N. Mohd Jaafar

In this study, thermodynamic modeling and exergoeconomic assessment of a Combined Cycle Power Plant (CCPP) with a Duct Burner (DB) was performed. Obtaining an optimum condition for the performance of a CCPP, using a DB after gas turbine was investigated by various researchers. DB is installed between gas turbine cycle and Rankine cycle of a CCPP to connect the gas turbine outlet to the Heat Recovery Steam Generator (HRSG) in order to produce steam for bottoming cycle. To find the irreversibility effect in each component of the bottoming cycle, a comprehensive parametric study is performed. In this regard, the effect of DB fuel flow rate on cost efficiency and economic of the bottoming cycle are investigated. To obtain a reasonable result, all the design parameters are kept constant while the DB fuel flow rate is varied. The results indicate that by increasing DB fuel flow rate, the investment cost and the efficiency of CCPP are increased. T-S diagram reveals that by using a DB, higher pressures steam in heat recovery steam generator has higher temperature while the low pressure is decreased. In addition, the exergy of flow gases in heat recovery steam generator increases. So, the exergy efficiency of the whole cycle was increased to around 6 percent, while the cost of the plant reduced by one percent.


Author(s):  
Ravin G. Naik ◽  
Chirayu M. Shah ◽  
Arvind S. Mohite

To produce the power with higher overall efficiency and reasonable cost is ultimate aim for the power industries in the power deficient scenario. Though combined cycle power plant is most efficient way to produce the power in today’s world, rapidly increasing fuel prices motivates to define a strategy for cost-effective optimization of this system. The heat recovery steam generator is one of the equipment which is custom made for combined cycle power plant. So, here the particular interest is to optimize the combined power cycle performance through optimum design of heat recovery steam generator. The case of combined cycle power plant re-powered from the existing Rankine cycle based power plant is considered to be simulated and optimized. Various possible configuration and arrangements for heat recovery steam generator has been examined to produce the steam for steam turbine. Arrangement of heat exchangers of heat recovery steam generator is optimized for bottoming cycle’s power through what-if analysis. Steady state model has been developed using heat and mass balance equations for various subsystems to simulate the performance of combined power cycles. To evaluate the performance of combined power cycles and its subsystems in the view of second law of thermodynamics, exergy analysis has been performed and exergetic efficiency has been determined. Exergy concepts provide the deep insight into the losses through subsystems and actual performance. If the sole objective of optimization of heat recovery steam generator is to increase the exergetic efficiency or minimizing the exergy losses then it leads to the very high cost of power which is not acceptable. The exergo-economic analysis has been carried to find the cost flow from each subsystem involved to the combined power cycles. Thus the second law of thermodynamics combined with economics represents a very powerful tool for the systematic study and optimization of combined power cycles. Optimization studies have been carried out to evaluate the values of decision parameters of heat recovery steam generator for optimum exergetic efficiency and product cost. Genetic algorithm has been utilized for multi-objective optimization of this complex and nonlinear system. Pareto fronts generated by this study represent the set of best solutions and thus providing a support to the decision-making.


Author(s):  
Akber Pasha

In recent years the combined cycle has become a very attractive power plant arrangement because of its high cycle efficiency, short order-to-on-line time and flexibility in the sizing when compared to conventional steam power plants. However, optimization of the cycle and selection of combined cycle equipment has become more complex because the three major components, Gas Turbine, Heat Recovery Steam Generator and Steam Turbine, are often designed and built by different manufacturers. Heat Recovery Steam Generators are classified into two major categories — 1) Natural Circulation and 2) Forced Circulation. Both circulation designs have certain advantages, disadvantages and limitations. This paper analyzes various factors including; availability, start-up, gas turbine exhaust conditions, reliability, space requirements, etc., which are affected by the type of circulation and which in turn affect the design, price and performance of the Heat Recovery Steam Generator. Modern trends around the world are discussed and conclusions are drawn as to the best type of circulation for a Heat Recovery Steam Generator for combined cycle application.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document