Aerodynamics of a Family of Three Highly Loaded Low-Pressure Turbine Airfoils: Measured Effects of Reynolds Number and Turbulence Intensity in Steady Flow

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Popovic ◽  
J. Zhu ◽  
W. Dai ◽  
S. A. Sjolander ◽  
T. Praisner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Turbulence Intensity ◽  
Separation Bubble ◽  
Suction Side ◽  
Reynolds Numbers ◽  
Low Pressure ◽  
Aerodynamic Performance ◽  
Favourable Effect ◽  
Pressure Probe ◽  
Turbine Airfoils

The steady, midspan aerodynamic performance of a family of three low pressure (LP) turbine airfoils has been investigated in a low-speed cascade wind tunnel. The baseline profile has a Zweifel coefficient of 1.08. To examine the influence of increased loading as well as the loading distribution, two additional airfoils were designed, each with 25% higher loading than the baseline version. All three airfoils have the same design inlet and outlet flow angles. The aerodynamic performance was investigated for Reynolds numbers ranging from 25,000 to 150,000 (based on the axial chord and inlet velocity) and for values of freestream turbulence intensity of 1.5% and 4%. The flow field was measured with a three-hole pressure probe. Also, detailed loading distributions were obtained for all three airfoils using surface static pressure taps. The baseline airfoil and the new aft-loaded airfoil showed a separation bubble on the suction side of the airfoil under most of the conditions examined. In addition, a sudden and intermittent stall was observed at low Reynolds numbers for the new aft-loaded airfoil. The relatively short separation bubble would abruptly “burst” and fail to reattach. As the Reynolds number was decreased over a narrow range, the percentage of time that the flow was fully-separated increased to 100%. By comparison, the separation bubble on the baseline airfoil gradually increased in size in an orderly way as the Reynolds number was decreased. The new front-loaded airfoil provided the most encouraging performance: no separation bubble was present except at the very lowest Reynolds numbers. The absence of a separation bubble also had a favourable effect on the loss behaviour of this airfoil: despite its much higher aerodynamic loading, it exhibited very similar midspan losses to those observed for the baseline airfoil.

Experiments With Three-Dimensional Passive Flow Control Devices on Low-Pressure Turbine Airfoils

2004 ◽  
Vol 128 (2) ◽  
pp. 251-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas G. Bohl ◽  
Ralph J. Volino
Keyword(s):  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Flow Control ◽  
Separation Bubble ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Reynolds Numbers ◽  
Low Pressure ◽  
Trailing Edge ◽  
Low Pressure Turbine ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Turbine Airfoils

The effectiveness of three-dimensional passive devices for flow control on low pressure turbine airfoils was investigated experimentally. A row of small cylinders was placed at the pressure minimum on the suction side of a typical airfoil. Cases with Reynolds numbers ranging from 25,000 to 300,000 (based on suction surface length and exit velocity) were considered under low freestream turbulence conditions. Streamwise pressure profiles and velocity profiles near the trailing edge were documented. Without flow control a separation bubble was present, and at the lower Reynolds numbers the bubble did not close. Cylinders with two different heights and a wide range of spanwise spacings were considered. Reattachment moved upstream as the cylinder height was increased or the spacing was decreased. If the spanwise spacing was sufficiently small, the flow at the trailing edge was essentially uniform across the span. The cylinder size and spacing could be optimized to minimize losses at a given Reynolds number, but cylinders optimized for low Reynolds number conditions caused increased losses at high Reynolds numbers. The effectiveness of two-dimensional bars had been studied previously under the same flow conditions. The cylinders were not as effective for maintaining low losses over a range of Reynolds numbers as the bars.

Analysis of Laminar-Turbulent Transition of a Low-Loss Generic Low Pressure Turbine Distribution

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Brück ◽  
Christoph Lyko ◽  
Dieter Peitsch ◽  
Christoph Bode ◽  
Jens Friedrichs ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Wind Tunnel ◽  
Pressure Distribution ◽  
Turbulence Intensity ◽  
Suction Side ◽  
Reynolds Numbers ◽  
Low Pressure ◽  
Test Case ◽  
Low Loss ◽  
Low Pressure Turbine

The efficiency of modern Turbofan engines can be significantly increased by using a gearbox between compressor and turbine of the low pressure section. Rotational speed of the low pressure turbine (LPT) in a Geared Turbofan is much higher than in normal LPT’s which lead to necessary adjustments in blade design. This work has investigated the transition behavior of a modified profile geometry for low-loss at engine cruise conditions. Typical LPT conditions have thus been chosen as baseline for the experimental work. A pressure distribution has been created on a flat plate by means of contoured walls in a low speed wind tunnel. The paper will analyze the experimental results and show additionally the numerical predictions of the test case. The experimental part of this paper describe how the blade was Mach number scaled to obtain the geometry of the wind tunnel wall contour. The pressure distribution for the incompressible test case show a very good agreement to the compressible case. Boundary layer (BL) measurements with hot-wire-anemometry have been performed at high spatial resolution under a freestream turbulence of almost 8%. Different Reynolds numbers have been investigated and will be compared with special attention being paid to the transition on the suction side by contour plots (turbulence levels, turbulent intermittency) and integral BL parameters. It was found that the transition on the suction side is not completed for small Reynolds numbers but takes place at higher velocities. In the numerical part studies by means of steady RANS simulations with k-ω – SST turbulence model and γ-Reθ transition model have been conducted. The aim is to validate the RANS solver for the low-loss LPT application. Hence, comparison is made to the measured data and the transitional behavior of the BL. Furthermore, additional parameter variations have been conducted (turbulence intensity and Reynolds number). The numerical investigations show partially a good comparison for the BL development indicating the different transition modi with increasing Reynolds number and turbulence intensity.

Comparative Investigation of Three Highly Loaded LP Turbine Airfoils: Part I — Measured Profile and Secondary Losses at Design Incidence

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Zoric ◽  
I. Popovic ◽  
S. A. Sjolander ◽  
T. Praisner ◽  
E. Grover
Keyword(s):  
Secondary Flow ◽  
Separation Bubble ◽  
Suction Side ◽  
Reynolds Numbers ◽  
Pressure Probe ◽  
Freestream Turbulence ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Lp Turbine ◽  
Turbine Airfoils ◽  
Highly Loaded

At the 2006 ASME-IGTI Turbo-Expo, low-speed cascade results were presented for the midspan aerodynamic behaviour of a family of three highly loaded low-pressure (LP) turbine airfoils operating over a wide range of Reynolds numbers (25,000 to 150,000 based on the axial chord and inlet velocity), and for values of freestream turbulence intensity of 1.5% and 4%. All three airfoils have the same design inlet and outlet flow angles. The baseline cascade has a Zweifel coefficient of 1.08 and the two additional blade rows have values of 1.37. The new, more highly-loaded blade rows differ mainly in their loading distributions: one is front-loaded while the other is aft-loaded. The new front-loaded airfoil was found to have particularly attractive profile performance. Despite its exceptionally high value of Zweifel coefficient, it was found to be free of a separation bubble on its suction side at Reynolds numbers as low as 50,000, and this was reflected in very good profile loss behaviour. However, it was also noted in the earlier paper that the choice of a particular loading level and loading distribution would be influenced by more than its profile performance at design incidence. The present two-part paper extends the midspan aerodynamic comparison of the three airfoils to the secondary flow performance. The first part of the paper discusses both the profile and secondary flow performance of the three cascades at their design Reynolds number of 80,000 (or ∼ 125,000 based on exit velocity) for two freestream turbulence intensities of 1.5% and 4%. The secondary flow behaviour was determined from detailed flowfield measurements made at 40% axial chord downstream of the trailing edge using a seven-hole pressure probe. In addition to providing total pressure losses, the seven-hole probe measurements were also processed to give the downstream vorticity distributions. As has been found in other secondary flow investigations in turbine cascades, the present front-loaded airfoil showed higher secondary losses than the aft-loaded airfoil with the same value of Zweifel coefficient.

Experiments With Three Dimensional Passive Flow Control Devices on Low-Pressure Turbine Airfoils

2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas G. Bohl ◽  
Ralph J. Volino
Keyword(s):  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Flow Control ◽  
Separation Bubble ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Reynolds Numbers ◽  
Low Pressure ◽  
Trailing Edge ◽  
Low Pressure Turbine ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Turbine Airfoils

The effectiveness of three dimensional passive devices for flow control on low pressure turbine airfoils was investigated experimentally. A row of small cylinders was placed at the pressure minimum on the suction side of a typical airfoil. Cases with Reynolds numbers ranging from 25,000 to 300,000 (based on suction surface length and exit velocity) were considered under low freestream turbulence conditions. Streamwise pressure profiles and velocity profiles near the trailing edge were documented. Without flow control a separation bubble was present, and at the lower Reynolds numbers the bubble did not close. Cylinders with two different heights and a wide range of spanwise spacings were considered. Reattachment moved upstream as the cylinder height was increased or the spacing was decreased. If the spanwise spacing was sufficiently small, the flow at the trailing edge was essentially uniform across the span. The cylinder size and spacing could be optimized to minimize losses at a given Reynolds number, but cylinders optimized for low Reynolds number conditions caused increased losses at high Reynolds numbers. The effectiveness of two-dimensional bars had been studied previously under the same flow conditions. The cylinders were not as effective for maintaining low losses over a range of Reynolds numbers as the bars.

The Effect of Pulsed Blowing on the Boundary Layer of a Highly Loaded Low Pressure Turbine Blade

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marion Mack ◽  
Roland Brachmanski ◽  
Reinhard Niehuis
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Mach Number ◽  
Suction Side ◽  
Reynolds Numbers ◽  
Low Pressure ◽  
Trailing Edge ◽  
Low Pressure Turbine ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Highly Loaded

The performance of the low pressure turbine (LPT) can vary appreciably, because this component operates under a wide range of Reynolds numbers. At higher Reynolds numbers, mid and aft loaded profiles have the advantage that transition of suction side boundary layer happens further downstream than at front loaded profiles, resulting in lower profile loss. At lower Reynolds numbers, aft loading of the blade can mean that if a suction side separation exists, it may remain open up to the trailing edge. This is especially the case when blade lift is increased via increased pitch to chord ratio. There is a trend in research towards exploring the effect of coupling boundary layer control with highly loaded turbine blades, in order to maximize performance over the full relevant Reynolds number range. In an earlier work, pulsed blowing with fluidic oscillators was shown to be effective in reducing the extent of the separated flow region and to significantly decrease the profile losses caused by separation over a wide range of Reynolds numbers. These experiments were carried out in the High-Speed Cascade Wind Tunnel of the German Federal Armed Forces University Munich, Germany, which allows to capture the effects of pulsed blowing at engine relevant conditions. The assumed control mechanism was the triggering of boundary layer transition by excitation of the Tollmien-Schlichting waves. The current work aims to gain further insight into the effects of pulsed blowing. It investigates the effect of a highly efficient configuration of pulsed blowing at a frequency of 9.5 kHz on the boundary layer at a Reynolds number of 70000 and exit Mach number of 0.6. The boundary layer profiles were measured at five positions between peak Mach number and the trailing edge with hot wire anemometry and pneumatic probes. Experiments were conducted with and without actuation under steady as well as periodically unsteady inflow conditions. The results show the development of the boundary layer and its interaction with incoming wakes. It is shown that pulsed blowing accelerates transition over the separation bubble and drastically reduces the boundary layer thickness.

An Experimental Investigation of the Effect of Freestream Turbulence on the Wake of a Separated Low-Pressure Turbine Blade at Low Reynolds Numbers

1999 ◽  
Vol 122 (2) ◽  
pp. 431-433 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. G. Murawski ◽  
K. Vafai
Keyword(s):  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Turbine Blade ◽  
Turbulence Intensity ◽  
Reynolds Numbers ◽  
Low Pressure ◽  
Freestream Turbulence ◽  
Suction Surface ◽  
Low Reynolds Numbers ◽  
Low Pressure Turbine ◽  
Flow Reynolds Number

An experimental study was conducted in a two-dimensional linear cascade, focusing on the suction surface of a low pressure turbine blade. Flow Reynolds numbers, based on exit velocity and suction length, have been varied from 50,000 to 300,000. The freestream turbulence intensity was varied from 1.1 to 8.1 percent. Separation was observed at all test Reynolds numbers. Increasing the flow Reynolds number, without changing freestream turbulence, resulted in a rearward movement of the onset of separation and shrinkage of the separation zone. Increasing the freestream turbulence intensity, without changing Reynolds number, resulted in shrinkage of the separation region on the suction surface. The influences on the blade’s wake from altering freestream turbulence and Reynolds number are also documented. It is shown that width of the wake and velocity defect rise with a decrease in either turbulence level or chord Reynolds number. [S0098-2202(00)00202-9]

Using Turbulence Intensity and Reynolds Number to Predict Flow Separation on a Highly Loaded, Low-Pressure Gas Turbine Blade at Low Reynolds Numbers

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth Van Treuren ◽  
Tyler Pharris ◽  
Olivia Hirst
Keyword(s):  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Gas Turbine ◽  
Turbine Blade ◽  
Turbulence Intensity ◽  
Flow Separation ◽  
Reynolds Numbers ◽  
Low Pressure ◽  
High Altitudes ◽  
Low Reynolds Numbers ◽  
Low Pressure Turbine

The low-pressure turbine has become more important in the last few decades because of the increased emphasis on higher overall pressure and bypass ratios. The desire is to increase blade loading to reduce blade counts and stages in the low-pressure turbine of a gas turbine engine. Increased turbine inlet temperatures for newer cycles results in higher temperatures in the low-pressure turbine, especially the latter stages, where cooling technologies are not used. These higher temperatures lead to higher work from the turbine and this, combined with the high loadings, can lead to flow separation. Separation is more likely in engines operating at high altitudes and reduced throttle setting. At the high Reynolds numbers found at takeoff, the flow over a low-pressure turbine blade tends to stay attached. At lower blade Reynolds numbers (25,000 to 200,000), found during cruise at high altitudes, the flow on the suction surface of the low-pressure turbine blades is inclined to separate. This paper is a study on the flow characteristics of the L1A turbine blade at three low Reynolds numbers (60,000, 108,000, and 165,000) and 15 turbulence intensities (1.89% to 19.87%) in a steady flow cascade wind tunnel. With this data, it is possible to examine the impact of Reynolds number and turbulence intensity on the location of the initiation of flow separation, the flow separation zone, and the reattachment location. Quantifying the change in separated flow as a result of varying Reynolds numbers and turbulence intensities will help to characterize the low momentum flow environments in which the low-pressure turbine must operate and how this might impact the operation of the engine. Based on the data presented, it is possible to predict the location and size of the separation as a function of both the Reynolds number and upstream freestream turbulence intensity (FSTI). Being able to predict this flow behavior can lead to more effective blade designs using either passive or active flow control to reduce or eliminate flow separation.

Comparative Investigation of Three Highly Loaded LP Turbine Airfoils: Part II — Measured Profile and Secondary Losses at Off-Design Incidence

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Zoric ◽  
I. Popovic ◽  
S. A. Sjolander ◽  
T. Praisner ◽  
E. Grover
Keyword(s):  
Separation Bubble ◽  
Suction Side ◽  
Comparative Investigation ◽  
Secondary Flows ◽  
The Other ◽  
Pressure Probe ◽  
Low Pressure Turbine ◽  
Profile Losses ◽  
Lp Turbine ◽  
Turbine Airfoils

The first part of the paper compared the midspan aerodynamics and the secondary flows for a family of three low-pressure turbine (LPT) airfoils at design conditions. However, since a typical engine spends much of its time operating at off-design conditions, good tolerance of LPT airfoils to off-design operation is desired. The sensitivity of the midspan flow to Reynolds number was examined for the three airfoils in a paper presented at the 2006 ASME-IGTI Turbo-Expo. The present paper examines the performance of the airfoils for three values of incidence: −5, 0, and +5 degrees relative to design. Both the profile and secondary losses are considered. Detailed loading distributions measured at midspan are used to explain the behaviour of the profile flow and the resulting change in losses as the incidence was varied. The secondary flow behaviour is determined as at the design incidence from detailed flowfield measurements made downstream of the trailing edge using a seven-hole pressure probe. The results show that in terms of profile losses the baseline airfoil (which has a Zweifel coefficient Z = 1.08) and the front-loaded one with Z = 1.37 have comparable losses over the range of incidences examined. However, the aft-loaded airfoil with Z = 1.37 had noticeably higher profile losses than the other two. On the other hand, the front-loaded one has higher secondary losses than its aft-loaded counterpart at all conditions examined. This obviously poses a dilemma for the designer in terms of the choice of loading distribution. It was also noted that the distribution of loading seems to affect the secondary losses more than the loading level (Zweifel coefficient). An interaction of the secondary flows with the suction side separation bubble might be responsible in part for this finding.

Comparative Investigation of Laminar Separation Bubble on a Wing at Low Reynolds Number

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
M.P. Uthra ◽  
A. Daniel Antony
Keyword(s):  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Separation Bubble ◽  
Low Reynolds Number ◽  
Flow Characteristics ◽  
Suction Side ◽  
Aerodynamic Performance ◽  
Laminar Separation Bubble ◽  
Laminar Separation ◽  
Low Reynolds ◽  
Air Vehicles

Most admirable and least known features of low Reynolds number flyers are their aerodynamics. Due to the advancements in low Reynolds number applications such as Micro Air vehicles (MAV), Unmanned Air Vehicles (UAV) and wind turbines, researchers’ concentrates on Low Reynolds number aerodynamics and its effect on aerodynamic performance. The Laminar Separation Bubble (LSB) plays a deteriorating role in affecting the aerodynamic performance of the wings. The parametric study has been performed to analyse the flow around cambered, uncambered wings with different chord and Reynolds number in order to understand the better flow characteristics, LSB and three dimensional flow structures. The computational results are compared with experimental results to show the exact location of LSB. The presence of LSB in all cases is evident and it also affects the aerodynamic characteristics of the wing. There is a strong formation of vortex in the suction side of the wing which impacts the LSB and transition. The vortex structures impact on the LSB is more and it also increases the strength of the LSB throughout the span wise direction.

Heat Transfer Measurements on a Turbine Airfoil at Various Reynolds Numbers and Turbulence Intensities Including Effects of Surface Roughness

1996 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Hoffs ◽  
U. Drost ◽  
A. Bölcs
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Liquid Crystals ◽  
Turbulence Intensity ◽  
Leading Edge ◽  
Suction Side ◽  
Reynolds Numbers ◽  
Laminar To Turbulent Transition ◽  
Dimensional Boundary ◽  
Turbulence Length ◽  
Turbine Airfoils

This paper presents heat transfer measurements on a turbine airfoil in a linear cascade at various exit Reynolds and Mach numbers ranging from 3.2e5 to 1.6e6 and 0.2 to 0.8, respectively, which have been conducted with the transient liquid crystal technique. Two series were performed at turbulence intensities of 5.5% and 10%, the latter being created by a squared-bar mesh placed 10 meshsizes upstream of the turbine airfoils. While normally polished liquid crystals were used additional experiments were done at the high turbulence intensity with naturally rough liquid crystals. All measurements indicate a gradual increase in heat transfer and an upstream shift of the laminar-to-turbulent transition with increasing Reynolds number and turbulence intensity. The leading edge heat transfer agrees well with correlations if the turbulence length scale is taken into account. The measurements conducted with rough liquid crystals show an earlier transition on the suction side. Calculations with a two-dimensional boundary layer code agree well with the measurements.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document