On-Engine Expansion Measurement of Exhaust Manifold for Calibrating Thermo-Mechanical Fatigue FEA Model

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Girish J. Kulkarni ◽  
Pravin Kakde ◽  
Vinod Parekar ◽  
Kapil Mestry ◽  
Sandeep Bhosle

Abstract An attempt was made as part of this work to acquire on-engine measurements to identify how closely current Finite Element Analysis (FEA) models replicate actual on-engine exhaust manifold behavior. Further correlation study with FEA models was performed to understand and eliminate the gaps to improve the overall FEA process. Dry cast iron exhaust manifolds experience thermo-mechanical fatigue (TMF) during engine operation. This is one of the critical failure modes. Literature is available to perform TMF assessment of exhaust manifold e.g. [1–6]. However, it is difficult to accurately predict TMF life of exhaust manifold in FEA due to dependency on multiple factors such as non-linear material behavior [3], temperature dependent material behavior, oxidation effect, creep effect, accuracy in prediction of metal temperatures and joint friction effects. Typically, non-linear material models, creep effects and oxidation effects are accounted by advanced fatigue processing software. Non-linear material models account for material and for temperature dependent non-linearity [4]. These non-linear material model and fatigue parameters are often developed using uniaxial specimen level testing. These doesn’t account for all the complexity during on-engine test due to factors such as friction and bolt loads that can influence manifold behavior. FEA processes for exhaust manifolds are seldom calibrated with on-engine measurements due to the complexity of obtaining these measurements in an environment that has severe temperatures and vibrations. The correlation study highlighted that exhaust manifold was over constrained by excessive clamping in FEA. This raised question on the gasket coefficient of friction (COF) and working preloads. These settings were investigated to get better correlation. Using reduced COF and non-linear material model for manifold capscrews, helped to achieve better correlation. Replacing material properties of manifold capscrews with nonlinear data provided capability to simulate localized yielding of capscrews and hence the corresponding load loss. Using these new settings for few other case studies also showed improvement in correlation of manifold warpage and thermal fatigue life prediction. Outcome of this work was a refined FEA approach which showed better FEA to Test correlation for exhaust manifold subject to thermal loading.

Mechanik ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 90 (12) ◽  
pp. 1193-1195
Author(s):  
Przemysław Poszwa ◽  
Paweł Brzęk ◽  
Marek Szostak

The influence of simplified and expanded material model on stress and strain in plastic parts was presented. Due to nonlinear properties, the prediction of plastic parts behavior is difficult. In this paper, it was shown what simplifications should be used with linear material model for fiber-filled plastics.


1996 ◽  
Vol 118 (4) ◽  
pp. 503-508 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. E. Vallee ◽  
Arun Shukla

A numerical method is described for determining a dynamic finite element material model for elastomeric materials loaded primarily in compression. The method employs data obtained using the Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar (SHPB) technique to define a molecular constitutive model for elastomers. The molecular theory is then used to predict dynamic material behavior in several additional deformation modes used by the ABAQUS/Explicit (Hibbitt, Karlsson, and Sorenson, 1993a) commercial finite element program to define hyperelastic material behavior. The resulting dynamic material models are used to create a finite element model of the SHPB system, yielding insights into both the accuracy of the material models and the SHPB technique itself when used to determine the dynamic behavior of elastomeric materials. Impact loading of larger elastomeric specimens whose size prohibits examination by the SHPB technique are examined and compared to the results of dynamic load-deflection experiments to further verify the dynamic material models.


2018 ◽  
Vol 195 ◽  
pp. 93-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Jansson ◽  
T. Gustafsson ◽  
K. Salomonsson ◽  
J. Olofsson ◽  
J. Johansson ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Tim Gilman ◽  
Bill Weitze ◽  
Jürgen Rudolph ◽  
Adrian Willuweit ◽  
Arturs Kalnins

Applicable design codes for power plant components and pressure vessels demand for a design check against progressive plastic deformation. In the simplest case, this demand is satisfied by compliance with shakedown rules in connection with elastic analyses. The possible non-compliance implicates the requirement of ratcheting analyses on elastic-plastic basis. In this case, criteria are specified on maximum allowable accumulated growth strain without clear guidance on what material models for cyclic plasticity are to be used. This is a considerable gap and a challenge for the practicing CAE (Computer Aided Engineering) engineer. As a follow-up to two independent previous papers PVP2013-98150 ASME [1] and PVP2014-28772 [2] it is the aim of this paper to close this gap by giving further detailed recommendation on the appropriate application of the nonlinear kinematic material model of Chaboche on an engineering scale and based on implementations already available within commercial finite element codes such as ANSYS® and ABAQUS®. Consistency of temperature-dependent runs in ANSYS® and ABAQUS® is to be checked. All three papers together constitute a comprehensive guideline for elasto-plastic ratcheting analysis. The following issues are examined and/or referenced: • Application of monotonic or cyclic material data for ratcheting analysis based on the Chaboche material model • Discussion of using monotonic and cyclic data for assessment of the (non-stabilized) cyclic deformation behavior • Number of backstress terms to be applied for consistent ratcheting results • Consideration of the temperature dependency of the relevant material parameters • Consistency of temperature-dependent runs in ANSYS® and ABAQUS® • Identification of material parameters dependent on the number of backstress terms • Identification of material data for different types of material (carbon steel, austenitic stainless steel) including the appropriate determination of the elastic limit • Quantification of conservatism of simple elastic-perfectly plastic behavior • Application of engineering versus true stress-strain data • Visual checks of data input consistency • Appropriate type of allowable accumulated growth strain. This way, a more accurate inelastic analysis methodology for direct practical application to real world examples in the framework of the design code conforming elasto-plastic ratcheting check is proposed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document