The Modernization of Quality Assurance Requirements

Author(s):  
John G. Adkins

In 2009 the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) will issue Regulatory Guide 1.28 [1] endorsing the Nuclear Quality Assurance (NQA) Standard, NQA-1-2008 Edition with NQA-1a-2009 Addenda [2] as the appropriate quality assurance (QA) requirements for the design, construction and operation of new and existing U.S. nuclear generating facilities. This endorsement will change the U.S. regulatory QA position from NQA-1-1994 and incorporate 15 years of quality experience, lessons learned, technology enhancements and regulatory changes. This regulatory position change will subsequently be included in a revision to the NRC’s NUREG-0800, Standard Review Plan (SRP) 17.5, Quality Assurance Program Description – Design Certification, Early Site Permit and New License Applicants [3]. The Nuclear Energy Institute’s NEI 06-14A, Quality Assurance Program Description (QAPD) [4], which provides a generic QA template for use by new generation early site permit and combined license applicants for implementing QA regulatory requirements of SRP 17.5 will subsequently be revised to document the new regulatory position for the use of NQA-1a-2009. These new quality requirements will be passed on by the utilities constructing new generating facilities to the both U.S. and international suppliers, thus changing the basis of QA requirements for the nuclear industry. The NQA-1 Standard is a four-part criteria standard that provides quality requirements and acceptance criteria for the implementation of a nuclear facility quality assurance program. Part I describes the basic QA program elements and Part II provides requirements for specialized support and application activities for design, construction and operations. Part III contains guidance that support Parts I and II, and Part IV provides guidance for comparison of NQA-1 with other quality standards. This paper will focus on the background of the quality changes included in the endorsement on NQA-1-2008 with the NQA-1a-2009 Addenda and provide a detailed discussion of the following major changes: • Facility configuration control – measures to ensure changes that may affect the approved facility configuration are recognized and processed. • Engineering interface controls – controls to ensure interfaces for design changes are established among design organizations. • Software design controls – alternate design measures specifically for software design to ensure design input, design processes, verification and change control are appropriately performed. • Software application requirements – controls for the software engineering requirements for the acquisition, development, operation, maintenance, and retirement of software. • Electronic records – controls that address use of electronic media for QA record activities. • Commercial grade items – a composite document of criteria for the identification and dedication of commercial grade items and services. • Clarifications for consistency of basic QA requirements – areas in the Standard where the QA text needed to be return to basic principles and to add clarification to ensure national and international consistent application.

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (3A) ◽  
Author(s):  
ANA ROSA BALIZA MAIA ◽  
Youssef Morghi ◽  
AMIR ZACARIAS MESQUITA

According to NRC, the commercial-grade dedication is a process by which a commercial-grade item (CGI) is designated for use as a basic component. This acceptance process is undertaken to provide reasonable assurance that a CGI to be used as a basic component will perform its intended safety function and, in this respect, is deemed equivalent to an item designed and manufactured under a quality assurance program. This assurance is achieved by identifying the critical characteristics of the item and verifying their acceptability by inspections, tests, or analyses by the purchaser or third-party dedicating entity. In Brazil there are two Nuclear Power Plants in operation, one is American design (Angra 1), other is German design (Angra 2) and one is under construction that is German design (Angra 3). The nuclear safety items are imported and many of them are obsolete and besides the process of purchasing imported items is very complicated. If the nuclear industry in Brazil adopt the Commercial-grade dedication it will improve the internal market and facilitate the process of purchasing items. The Brazilian Quality Assurance Standard (Cnen NN 1.16) shows the 18 Basic requirements of 10 CFR 50 App B, so the Brazilian Industry can be qualified according to this Brazilian standard. The critical characteristics identification and the testing process is an engineering responsibility that Brazilian engineer can perform. This work shows the challenge of commercial-grade dedication in Brazil and discuss the importance of this process to the operation of the nuclear power plants in Brazil, including the long-term operation and others Brazilian nuclear projects..


Author(s):  
J. J. Balkey ◽  
L. J. Sanchez ◽  
R. E. Wieneke

Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) is one of two design laboratories in the United States Department of Energy’s (DOE) weapons complex. It has over 60 years of experience in handling radioactive materials and, consequently, in radioactive waste management. The current focus at LANL for actinide research and development is the Plutonium Facility, which has been in operation since 1978 and is the major source of transuranic (TRU) waste. The Nuclear Materials Technology (NMT) Division is responsible for operating the Plutonium Facility. It has a dedicated group of personnel who manage radioactive and hazardous waste, and address environmental regulations. The TRU Waste Certification Program has prescriptive requirements that must be met for waste to be certified by the DOE’s Carlsbad Field Office, which provides oversight to the final waste repository, the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) in Carlsbad, New Mexico. Quality assurance expectations are also well defined, from top-tier documents such as 10 Code of Federal Regulations 830.120. Quality Assurance Requirements, which carry the force of law, through CAO-94-1012, Quality Assurance Program Document, from WIPP, to LANL internal working documents. Internal and external audits are conducted regularly to verify the adequacy of the program for meeting these requirements. To ensure compliance with quality requirements in waste operations, the NMT-7 Waste Management and Environmental Compliance Group has two full-time quality assurance (QA) specialists. They are responsible for maintaining the Quality Assurance Program (QAP). They work directly with waste management personnel, and they are frequently in the field, working beside waste management technicians. They are responsible for ensuring that applicable QAP elements are implemented as required, and that waste operations are effective. They review waste management program documents and waste operations for compliance with requirements, and they observe selected waste operations regularly to ensure that these operations are being conducted in accordance with established procedures. A yearly surveillance schedule is established to guide assessment activities, but it has the flexibility to allow the QA specialists to address any problem areas they may encounter. The QA specialists track performance indicators and evaluate them for systemic issues that may affect quality, including tracking program corrective actions to completion. Monthly reports on QA activities are submitted to group managers. The QA specialists are also asked, on occasion, to lead quality-related investigations and to work with operations personnel to propose solutions. As a direct result of their efforts, the waste management group won Pin˜on quality assurance recognition from Quality New Mexico for the group’s commitment to quality.


Author(s):  
Matthew Faciane ◽  
Susan K. Fan ◽  
Rocky J. Dwyer

The purpose of this qualitative case study was to explore quality improvement strategies senior manufacturing production managers use to reduce Cost of Poor Quality (COPQ) to increase profit. The participants for this study were production managers within a manufacturing company located in the southeastern region of the United States who successfully developed and implemented strategies to lower COPQ to increase profitability. Six major themes emerged from the study: continuous improvement, quality assurance, employees as agents of quality improvement, communication between stakeholders, holding all firm members accountable for quality, and training. Manufacturing managers can use these strategies to lower COPQ and increase profits, which could result in enhancing other organizations’ financial performance. Findings from this study may enable manufacturing managers to improve organizational performance when continuous quality improvement processes are implemented throughout the manufacturing process and senior leaders champion lessons learned, support the training program approach, and implement a quality assurance program that empowers frontline employees as agents of quality throughout the manufacturing process.


2020 ◽  
Vol 154 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S139-S139
Author(s):  
J M Petersen ◽  
D Jhala

Abstract Introduction/Objective The appropriate reporting and monitoring of legionella antigen and culture test volumes and results is a veteran affairs quality assurance regulatory requirement. Legionnaires disease incidence has been noted to be increasing in the United States, and it has also been documented that health care facilities are especially high- risk settings for the transmission of Legionella bacteria from the building water systems to the occupants. However, studies of Legionella test epidemiology for non-veteran hospitals is sparse in the literature. To provide perspective, here we report the total legionella antigen and culture tests from quarter 1 2016 to quarter 4 2019 to provide a regional perspective. Methods Quality assurance data on both the total number of Legionella antigen and culture tests and the recorded number of positive cases were reviewed from quarter 1 2016 to quarter 4 2019 and tabulated. This data is collected routinely as per veteran affairs regulatory directives. Results There were a total of 1613 legionella antigen tests and 1287 legionella cultures. None of the Legionella cultures were positive during the study period. Nonetheless, there were 3 positive urinary antigen tests for a total calculated percentage of 0.00002%. Conclusion The presence of positive Legionella antigen tests at a regional veteran affairs medical center indicates that a robust quality assurance program is tremendous benefit to monitoring Legionella at a major medical institution in order to prompt action to prevent hospital-based spread.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vaughn Edward Halford ◽  
Ann Marie Ryder

2007 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 283-288
Author(s):  
Morrie Craig ◽  
G. Rottinghaus ◽  
K. Walker ◽  
E. Ishikuro

Quality assurance and quality control is the foundation of any diagnostic test. The two laboratories in the United States that use HPLC to quantitate endophyte toxins in tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) and perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) are Oregon State University (OSU) and University of Missouri (MU). Japan, the major importer of grass straw has six new laboratories that will test agricultural imports for endophyte toxins. A quality assurance program was set up between the Japanese Ministry of Agriculture and the State of Oregon. The latter includes both OSU and the MU. All units are using an accurate crystalline standard and have exchanged "check" samples among themselves. To date OSU and MU have values that differ by 10%. OSU has identified a contaminating and coeluting peak as the cause of the differences. Both laboratories are changing to a Gemini column to rectify the differences. Japanese laboratories are in the process of evaluating their split check samples. Keywords: quality assurance, quality control, endophyte, tall fescue, perennial ryegrass


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document